College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Campus activism: Then and now

‘Notre Dame 10’ to return to campus to honor 40th anniversary of Dow-CIA demonstration

By Madeline Buckley

News Editor

|

Published: Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Photo provided by Mark Mahoney

Observer archives

Students stage a sit-in in the Main Building on Nov. 18, 1969 to protest on-campus recruitment by the Dow Chemical Co. and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

Father Hesburgh

‘The only rules of the game’

Hesburgh reflects on student activism, 15-min. rule on 40th anniversary of ‘Notre Dame 10’

In the fall of 1969, then-University President Fr. Theodore Hesburgh's office door was always open, it seems.    Reflecting on the time of what he calls “the student revolution” in his new office in the Library named for him, Hesburgh described the protest fervor that swept across a nation at war in a foreign land and turned college campuses into battlefields.  Full story

Editor’s note: This is the first of a four-part series commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Notre Dame 10 and exploring the history of student activism on campus.

The number 10 had a special ring to it in November of 1969.


On Nov. 18, 1969, 10 students were suspended for a protest related to the Vietnam War, and the group was quickly dubbed the “Notre Dame 10” as they fought their suspension — an issue that generated national media attention at the time.


For Mark Mahoney, one of the suspended students, that number 10 has influenced him for a lifetime.


On the 40th anniversary of the protest and suspension, Mahoney, class of 1971, is returning to Notre Dame Wednesday with other members of the Notre Dame 10 to explore campus activism now and then with a panel discussion, a dinner and a Mass presided by University President Emeritus Fr. Theodore Hesburgh and Fr. Emmanuel Charles McCarthy.


“We are not returning to campus because of nostalgia. There’s nothing to be nostalgic about during this period,” he said. “There were horrific things being done and we were anguishing over that.”


About 1 p.m. on that Tuesday afternoon, Mahoney said about 100 students gathered in the Main Building to protest on-campus recruitment efforts by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and The Dow Chemical Co. The students involved in the demonstration, known as the Dow-CIA protest, objected to Dow’s production of napalm, a chemical used by the military in the Vietnam War, often on civilians.


The students rallied under the Dome, blocking Dow and CIA recruiters from entering or leaving the building.


“We were staging a sit in, and at the time, that form of protest well known in the anti-war movement and the Civil Rights movement,” Mahoney said.


But months earlier, Hesburgh, then-University president, had enacted the 15-minute rule to address the rising number of campus protests. The rule stated that demonstrators were allowed 15 minutes to protest. If they did not stop in that period, the students would face consequences.


“Anyone or any group that substitutes force for rational persuasion, be it violent or non-violent, will be given 15 minutes of meditation to cease and desist,” Hesburgh wrote in a letter to Notre Dame faculty and students dated Feb. 17, 1969.


“If they do not within that time period cease and desist, they will be asked for their identity card,” the letter said.


The Notre Dame 10 was the first and only group of students punished through the 15-minute rule.


Fr. James Riehle, dean of students at the time, took the identification cards of 10 students after the 15 minutes had passed.


Mahoney said the students banded together that night and eventually appealed their suspensions. Originally, five students were expelled and five were suspended.


Riehle downgraded the expulsion of the five students to a suspension, but did not remove the suspension of the 10 students, Mahoney said.


“The proceedings were very court-like and the procedures and rules of evidence and thing were quite technical,” Mahoney said. “But the technicality of that wasn’t our concern. It was that the issues we were raising were moral issues, not legal issues.”


John Eckenrode was one of the 10 suspended that day along with Mahoney, and he graduated a semester late because of the suspension. But he said he does not regret his involvement in the demonstration.


“I was aware that the 15 minute rule could be evoked. I made a decision that it was a time to take a stand on this issue aware there might be some consequences involved,” Eckenrode said.


Eckenrode will return to campus Wednesday for the 40th anniversary of the protest, along with Mahoney.


“I think it’s important for us as a university to commemorate what has really been a long and interesting history of social activism at Notre Dame,” Eckenrode said. “For me, this is keeping alive a part of Notre Dame history.”


Mahoney said it is important to him to keep the dialogue alive.


“So many students at Notre Dame are socially conscious and concerned with issues of morality, institutions and life and death issues,” he said. “We need to continually question what the role is of a Catholic university is in times of war.”


When visiting campus on Wednesday, Eckenrode said he hopes to learn about activism on campus now.


“As an alum, I what to know what the issues of concern are for students,” he said. “I want to see what is the same and what has changed from 40 years ago.”

The second installment of this series will look back on the events of 40 years ago and examine possibilities for the future of student activism. It will run in Wednesday’s edition.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments

Aaron Kreider
Thu Nov 19 2009 17:03
The CIA still recruits on the Notre Damen campus. I protested them when I was a student (1997-2001).

Two of the most famous CIA defectors were Notre Dame grads: Philip Agee and Ralph McGehee. They both wrote books about their experiences.

Your name
Tue Nov 17 2009 23:51
There were actually many more than 10 who had the courage to act. Scores of us handed in our ID's whether we were in front of the door or not. The Administration picked 10 of us to suspend based on some unfathomable criteria. We ten were an interesting mix for sure.
Ed Roickle '69, then '70
Tue Nov 17 2009 23:50
There were actually many more than 10 who had the courage to act. Scores of us handed in our ID's whether we were in front of the door or not. The Administration picked 10 of us to suspend based on some unfathomable criteria. We ten were an interesting mix for sure.
Karen Grabowski Dowd
Tue Nov 17 2009 16:09
Karen Grabowski Dowd SMC '71, GP (PLS) major, and co-leader of a student group that initiated the minor in Non-Violence: I was t here that day, and remember being very aware of the importance of as an individual taking a stand. I din't have to sacrifice the way the ten did, and my heart goes out to them for the way their lives were affected. We were young, but very aware of how our actions and the University's were intersecting. It was a powerful time to be at Notre Dame and Saint Mary's. The learning that occurred, and the relationships that developed between individual students and faculty during that time, were potent.
Robert Haight '71
Tue Nov 17 2009 15:47
I was there that day (that may be my photo as I shot for the Observer and Scholastic?) and it was not just a protest but a teach-in where moral issues were discussed. Several CSCs (Father Burrell and Father Burtchaell as I recall) gave testimony about the moral duty of Catholics to speak out concerning just war and even celebrated Mass there under the Dome. From a student perspective, we were in the middle of a debate that was not even conclusive within the religious community itself.

This was during the period when Richard Nixon won election partly by promising "law and order" on campuses; "Ted the Head's" 15 minute rule received national coverage and was praised by conservatives. I was not one of the original ND ten; my separation from the University came later in the spring of 1970 when Nixon invaded Cambodia and campuses erupted nationwide, leading to the Kent State and Jackson State killings of students. Hundreds of campuses closed and millions of students took action on their beliefs.

Does the difference between the activist Viet Nam era and today reflect the fact that there was a civilian draft in place during that earlier period, unlike today?

Gary Kopycinski
Tue Nov 17 2009 11:47
The sad thing is, there were only 10 who had the courage to act.

Notre Dame has always been that isolated place where activism goes to die. The slumbering, apathetic university always patting itself on the back because it has a nice campus.

When I was there, the biggest protest was the day the administration decided to announce the new alcohol policy. Take booze away from the privileged undergrads, suddenly there's a rush on the Golden Dome. Apartheid in South Africa while the University continues to invest and support South Africa?

Turn the page.

raycyrx
Tue Nov 17 2009 11:39
Nowadays, the University presses charges for people that pray the rosary and are NOT disrupting university operations or the rights of others.

My how things have changed.







log out