Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Farmer: I told you so: quarterbacks don’t matter (Nov. 29)

Editor-in-Chief

Published: Monday, November 28, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:09

Quarterbacks

PAT COVENEY/The Observer

Senior quarterback Dayne Crist, left, and sophomore quarterback Tommy Rees converse during Notre Dame’s 28-14 loss to Stanford on Saturday. Crist and Rees battled for the starting position this summer.

STANFORD, Calif. — This column seems very familiar. In fact, above it could sit a sentence in italics: "Editor's note: This column originally ran online at ndsmcobserver.com Monday, August 22." That column's title still rings true: "Kelly's quarterback announcement doesn't matter."

Then, Irish fans wondered if senior Dayne Crist or sophomore Tommy Rees would lead the offense against South Florida in the season-opener.

Now, Irish fans wonder if Rees or sophomore Andrew Hendrix will take the field first in the Champs Sports Bowl on Dec. 29, and, subsequently, who will have the advantage to start at quarterback next season.

Then, prevailing sentiment leaned toward Crist, thanks to his physical appearance, high-profile recruitment and general skill set.

Now, prevailing sentiment leans toward Hendrix, thanks to his running ability, relative success against Stanford and future possibilities.

Then and now, worries about Rees stemmed from his lack of speed, arm strength and low profile. Then and now, Irish coach Brian Kelly stood by Rees thanks to his record as a starter, now at 12-3.

Then and now, whoever takes the snap from center doesn't matter.

Both Rees and Hendrix are immensely talented, and each has skills the other lacks, but neither is the key to this version of the Irish, be it in the bowl game or next season. If the success of next season comes down to whom Kelly names bowl game starter, next season is already doomed. Not because neither Rees nor Hendrix is up to the task, but because so much else already would have gone wrong.

Look at Bob Diaco's defense. Next year it will return seven starters, as well as current freshmen linemen Stephon Tuitt and Aaron Lynch — both of whom have excelled in extended playing time — as well as their classmate and linebacker Ishaq Williams. With this defense, Kelly's starter should not face an 80-yard field very often.

Look at the offensive weapons waiting for either Rees or Hendrix. Yes, senior Michael Floyd only has one game left in a Notre Dame uniform, but do not underestimate current sophomore TJ Jones, junior Theo Riddick and junior tight end Tyler Eifert. Add in junior Cierre Wood with the backfield all to his own and another 1,000-yard season is inevitable. Who knows what current freshman receiver DaVaris Daniels and freshman running back George Atkinson will add to the recipe?

With that corps, points will come if Kelly's quarterback can simply get the ball within a few feet of Eifert or to Riddick and Woods three yards past the line of scrimmage.

From a physical standpoint, Kelly's designee should not have to do much in the bowl game or next season. This year's Irish did not lose four games because of Crist or Rees. Notre Dame lost four games because of repeated defensive secondary collapses and an inexcusable influx of turnovers. This year's Irish lost four games because of unrecoverable slow starts and special team woes. This year's Irish lost four games for a multitude of reasons, but Tommy Rees was not among them.

Furthermore, starting the bowl game will not give either Rees or Hendrix the added experience necessary to be a star next season. The bowl game will accomplish little for the Irish in any sense aside from possibly adding another win to the season's tally. When it comes to the gauntlet known as the 2012 schedule, however, don't look to bowl game successes or failures as precursors. Winter lifting, spring practice and summer workouts all exist for a reason. The Champs Sports Bowl exists solely to provide an enjoyable nightcap to this up-and-down season.

In the end, Notre Dame fans need not worry about the quarterback, whoever it may be. Their time is better spent biting their fingernails over Manti Te'o's NFL Draft status.

Contact Douglas Farmer at dfarmer1@nd.edu

The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Wambulance
Tue Nov 29 2011 21:17
What an embarrassment it is as an ND alum to read these personal attacks on Tommy Rees. He played as well as any sophomore QB in my years watching ND, which goes back to 1965. I hope the operators of this board do the right thing and delete these senseless personal attacks on Mr. Rees.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A personal attack would be something like saying, I don't like Tommy because he's ugly. Everyone on this board is saying he turns the ball over too much, that's not a personal attack it's a factual statement.
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 20:50
What an embarrassment it is as an ND alum to read these personal attacks on Tommy Rees. He played as well as any sophomore QB in my years watching ND, which goes back to 1965. I hope the operators of this board do the right thing and delete these senseless personal attacks on Mr. Rees.
Brian
Tue Nov 29 2011 18:12
Reese didn't loose games for us? Are you kidding? Our defense would not have been in the shambles it was during half those those games if Tommy Turnover would have hist his receivers. Did you see the last game? His interception was 10 yards short of Mike, give me a break. This kid has heart I will give him that but he was given too long a rope when compared to the chance Dayne was given. And as fro the comment about Teo's draft status, I think he is overrated. He was not even seen in the Stanford game, fox out played him. He was lost against USC and just not a good cover guy at all. Kelly needs to be biting his fingernails over Tyler and hoping he doesn't jump!
2008 Grad
Tue Nov 29 2011 14:53
The Edior-in-Chief wrote this?...It has been a few years since I graduated but do they still have that Football 101 class for girls who don't understand football?
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 12:29
This is like that time that guy told us the world was going to end and then it didn't end. Except he didn't say, "I told you so."
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 11:19
I like Tommy Rees, and I am grateful for his efforts and dedication to ND. But he turned the ball over many times this season; he is not blameless in the four losses.
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 11:12
Football is a game of momentum. If we score to make it 14-7 against Stanford, the whole game changes. Instead we have 0 points and two possessions later Rees throws an unforgivable interception that gives Stanford the field position and time to score again before half time further deflating our team.

Even given the 21-0 score, I am certain all true ND fans believed we could still win or, at the very least, make it a game once Hendrix came in, rejuvenated our offense and shifted momentum. Look at each of our losses and you see the numbing effect of bad turnovers and the resultant positive offensive momentum by our foes. All 4 of our losses were not to superior teams, but superior- game changing quarterbacks. Put Luck, Barkley, Robinson and even USF's BJ Daniels on the Irish and we win all 4 games. The problem is the quarterback position. The QB has the biggest effect on the result of a game and big momentum changing plays. Unfortunately for the Irish, we have not made the big QB plays on offense... only big plays for the other teams.

Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 10:33
I think it doesn't matter who starts at QB for easy games, but we need a playmaker in the tough ones like Stanford. Next year's schedule is going to be even harder than this year.
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 10:23
Blaming an 'inexcusable influx of turnovers' then stating Tommy Rees' play is not a problem are contradictions. He accounted for how many turnovers himself? 12 interceptions and - was it 7-8 fumbles lost? I can't find the latter statistic. Football is a team game so, yes, there are several people - players and coaches - who bear the responsibility for the losses. Tommy is one of them.
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 10:20
In three of the four losses, quarterback play was just about THE key difference. If we had Robinson, Barkley, or Luck on our side we'd be looking at an undefeated season.
JohnND1985
Tue Nov 29 2011 09:35
Anyone who says that it does not matter who plays quarterback is naive, at best.
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 09:31
"This year's Irish did not lose four games because of Crist or Rees." Really? Are we talking about the same Rees I watched turn the ball over all season?
Anonymous
Tue Nov 29 2011 09:14
Mr Farmer, with all due respect, you must have spent the entire season in the corn field.
Brandon
Tue Nov 29 2011 08:46
Wow. Did the author of this actually watch any of the games this year? Where to start... Don't under estimate TJ Jones? The kid shows no desire and is lazy in his blocking and routes. Cierre Wood is going to be fine being the feature back? He wears down after a few plays and is slow to get up after every decent hit. Rees isn't to blame for any of the losses, but the defense and turnovers are? Rees committed most of the turnovers with terrible decision making, a weak arm, and a lack of toughness. Fans refer to him as "Tommy Turnover" for a reason. The defense was stellar for most of the season and really only had one bad quarter against Michigan. Even then, they were put in that position by the offense's (i.e. Rees) inability to hold on to the ball. This article reads like a guy who either only looked at stat sheets and highlights or someone just being a contrarian to garner attention. Either way, it's shoddy journalism. Even the title is laughabe as the QB is (especially in Kelly's offense) the most important man on the field.




log out