Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

All the Pope's Men

The 17th Grade

Published: Thursday, April 8, 2010

Updated: Thursday, April 8, 2010 21:04

In 1974 Richard Nixon resigned from the presidency as a result of his role in a widespread cover-up of the criminal activities that his government had participated in over the course of his presidency.
While the Watergate scandal exemplified corruption and created a distrust of our federal government, it also exemplified one of the great things about the American political system: accountability. The crook that ordered the cover-up had no choice but to resign.

Over the past month it has been reported that the Pope and other leaders of our Church have been similarly involved in a widespread cover-up of criminal activities that members of the priesthood have been participating in over the past 60 years (and probably much longer). The circumstances surrounding the priestly cover-up, however, are much more troubling than those of Watergate not only because the original behavior is so much more heinous, but also because the leaders at the top are an important source of moral foundation for a billion people in our world.

Currently I am working as a teacher in China through a Catholic organization, and before coming here I had to take "Creating a Safe Environment for Children" training. This training included several videos of interviews with sexual predators that described their tactics to make sexual advances towards children or to get themselves alone with children.
Those of you that have seen these videos certainly remember how appalling they are. One man describes how he worked at a roller rink and how he told all the parents, "look how safe our roller rink is, no parents feel like they need to be here" and he went on to describe what he would do when he held children on his lap. Another man left pornographic magazines where children could see them, and would ask children what they thought of these magazines in order to begin his pursuit.

I believe that men like this are sick and dangerous, and that they should be locked away in the coldest and darkest prison cell imaginable so that they can't possibly come into contact with children while they await their long journey to hell. Until recently I believed that reasonable people would agree with me in this assessment, but if we are to believe The New York Times (which I do) it appears that our Pope and other leaders of our church seemingly believe that the sexual abuse of children is no big deal.
Reading these reports about the widespread sexual abuse problems that our church is undergoing disgusted me. It's one thing that a handful (okay, more than a handful) of priests practiced this abhorrent behavior, but it's a completely different (and more disturbing) problem that Pope Benedict and other Church leaders were seemingly involved in cover-ups stretching from Munich to Milwaukee that not only protected child-abusing priests from law enforcement, but allowed some of them to continue working with children in a priestly capacity
Aren't we supposed to look to priests and Church leaders for moral guidance? Isn't the primary purpose of religion to create a moral system that allows humans to live together harmoniously? How are the rest of us supposed to understand the difference between right and wrong if the leaders of our religion, the religion of one billion people, did not understand that these priests needed to be removed from the priesthood and sent to prison? How did Cardinal Ratzinger not understand the severity of these crimes?
The great success of Watergate is that it proved our political system works. While it certainly uncovered a disconcerting web of corruption and criminal behavior, it also proved that our system has the capacity to remove a president that can no longer credibly lead our country because of his activities. The problem with the Catholic religious system is that it has no such mechanism. I believe that the Pope is no longer able to credibly lead our religion because of his complicity in this cover-up and his continued refusal to address the allegations in a forthright manner, but even if every Catholic agreed with my assessment, we have no ability to force a change.

The great travesty of all this is that because the scandal has now engulfed the Pope, it unfortunately impacts all of the men that serve under him. In the same way that American's trust of our government was thrown into question as a result of Watergate, our trust of the Church and the institution of the priesthood is now in jeopardy because of the actions (and inactions) of the Pope and other leaders. Catholics should therefore demand that this Pope resign from his position not only because he now lacks a credible moral basis for his leadership, but more importantly because his continuing role as leader of the church threatens to destroy the foundation of our trust in the Priesthood and general opinions and perceptions of all the good men working under him worldwide.

Bob Kessler is a 2009 graduate
currently working as an English teacher in China. He is the writer of Things Notre Dame Students Like, and you can read more of his work at www.the17thgrade.com. He can be contacted at bob020787@gmail.com
The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not
necessarily those of The Observer.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

22 comments

Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 11:50
Dear Anonymous April 12 23:10, there is a difference between confirming the NYT story and citing it. The Chicago Tribune and other sources have been re-reporting the NYT claims about its exclusive memo and adding nothing new to that particular discussion.
Anonymous
Tue Apr 13 2010 00:27
The pope's going to jail. At least he might get laid in there.
Anonymous
Mon Apr 12 2010 11:14
New York Times most definitely not the only newspaper running this story. The Chicago Tribune (a moderate ly conservative newspaper), on April 9th substantiated Benedict's role in ignoring abuse cases, pointing to another case that occurred from 1978 until 1985. An April 12th story points to Benedict's lack of experience (only 5 years) as a parish priest to demontrate the pontiff's out-of-touch leadership as Pope. The Los Angeles Times (a newspaper that has irritated liberals and conservatives in the past) confirmed the NYT article on April 9th and provides links to the same reports cited and documented in the NYT article. Even the Wall Street Journal, by no means the flagship of liberal media exaggeration, admits to some truth in the NYT story. While the Journal, on April 6, questioned the reliability of the lawyers who provided the docoments on the grounds that they had an ax to grind, and while the paper defends the fact that Benedict has done more than anyone as Pope. At the same time, even this same WSJ article calls into question why it took 2 decades for many of these cases to be reviewed and for these priests to be punished. The point is, this is not a NYT conspiracy. Everyone is on this story and admits that the Pope and people around him did not do enough.
Anonymous
Mon Apr 12 2010 11:06
It is funny how the New York TIme claims to be protecting the children, but have never reported on the Teachers Union covering up the sexual abuse of more that 290,000 students in the 90's. Yup, they are believable.
Tom S
Sun Apr 11 2010 23:10
4. "Maybe in China accused criminals should be locked away in the coldest and darkest prison cell imaginable so that they can’t possibly come into contact with children while they await their long journey to hell. But in American and the Church the accused and the victims have rights. Pope Benedict is tough on sexual abuse, while respecting important rights. I am not surprised this article was printed, but it is a sign of the poor quality and editorial judgment of the Observer. As an ND student, I wish my tuition was not wasted on this paper." What does Mr. Kessler's presence in China have to do with anything, especially when he's there teaching children? This comment is irrelevant. Benedict tough on sexual abuse? Maybe as Pope, but not as Prefect, so he must be held accountable. As for your tuition, you pay a $12 Observer fee each year, so I'd happily refund you $48 for your four years here.
Anonymous
Sun Apr 11 2010 16:10
Please review all evidence before reporting statements as facts. To report statements that are not supported by evidence as facts, makes one guilty of both slander and libel when posting a comment on the internet.
Anonymous
Sun Apr 11 2010 16:02
Please remove the comment made at 10:26 on Sun11
Anonymous
Sun Apr 11 2010 10:26
The pope's going to jail. At least he might get laid in there.
Anonymous
Sat Apr 10 2010 11:57
Excerpts of an article written by non-Catholic Sam Miller - a prominent Cleveland
Jewish businessman:
"Why would newspapers carry on a vendetta on one of the most important institutions
that we have today in the United States, namely the Catholic Church?
The Catholic Church has a non-profit hospital system of 637 hospitals, which account for
hospital treatment of 1 out of every 5 people - not just Catholics - in the United States .
But the press is vindictive and trying to totally denigrate in every way the Catholic Church in
this country. They have blamed the disease of pedophilia on the Catholic Church, which is as irresponsible as blaming adultery on the institution of marriage.
Let me give you some figures that Catholics should know and remember.
For example, 12% of the 300 Protestant clergy surveyed admitted to sexual intercourse with a parishioner; 38% acknowledged other inappropriate sexual contact in a study by the United Methodist Church, 41.8% of clergy women reported unwanted sexual behavior; 17%
of lay women have been sexually harassed. Meanwhile, 1.7% of the Catholic clergy has been found guilty of pedophilia 10% of the Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia. This is not just a Catholic problem !
Walk with your shoulders high and your head higher. Be a proud member of the most important non-governmental agency in the United States. Then remember what Jeremiah said: 'Stand by the roads, and look and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is and walk in it, and find rest for your souls '. Be proud to speak up for your faith with pride and reverence and learn what your Church does for people all over the world ~ no matter what their religions.
Be proud that you're a Catholic."
Anonymous
Sat Apr 10 2010 09:30
Actually, the headline refers to the Watergate book and movie "All the President's Men."
And reveals the author's confusion about the nature of the Church. It's not a political institution, and its leaders don't respond to "demands" from outraged Catholics, the New York Times, or even the Observer.

"Isn’t the primary purpose of religion to create a moral system that allows humans to live together harmoniously? How are the rest of us supposed to understand the difference between right and wrong if the leaders of our religion, the religion of one billion people, did not understand that these priests needed to be removed from the priesthood and sent to prison?"

Well, let's take these questions one by one.

1. As a previous comment makes clear, Jesus Christ didn't establish the Church in order to "allow humans to live together harmoniously." If that's what the author learned at Notre Dame, he should demand a refund. "I have not come to bring peace on earth, but a sword." Does that ring a bell? I hope that you are not teaching religion in China.

2. Jesus chose 12 apostles. One betrayed him, one denied him, and the rest abandoned him. We are all sinners, including the leaders of the Church. It's unfortunate when priests and bishops fail to live up to their vows, but using that as an excuse to do what you please is childish. You are an adult, and you presumably know what the Church teaches on matters of faith and morals.

3. The Church can't "send" abusive priests to prison. That requires the civil authorities. In many cases, the victims and their parents declined to come forward, and, when they did, the authorities didn't always pursue the cases.

Anonymous
Sat Apr 10 2010 09:13
And if the Church returns a disgraced priest to the lay state, does he go directly to jail? Is he prevented from living near or otherwise coming into contact with young people?
Anonymous
Sat Apr 10 2010 05:36
The fact is, is that when it was Ratzinger's job to deal with this situation he held the reputation of the church above the harm being done to innocents.
Anonymous
Sat Apr 10 2010 03:03
And now comes the news that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger signed a letter in which he advised not taking action to defrock a San Francisco priest who was convicted of abusing children because it would discredit the church. The Inquisition, the Crusades, the Malleus Malificarum, the Holocaust, child-molestation....my how the mighty have fallen.

"Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burned, tortured, fined and imprisoned. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites; to support roguery and error all over the earth."

--Thomas Jefferson

Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 22:34
The author of this article really needs to work on his critical thinking skills. Maybe in China accused criminals "should be locked away in the coldest and darkest prison cell imaginable so that they can’t possibly come into contact with children while they await their long journey to hell." But in American and the Church the accused and the victims have rights. Pope Benedict is tough on sexual abuse, while respecting important rights. I am not surprised this article was printed, but it is a sign of the poor quality and editorial judgment of the Observer. As an ND student, I wish my tuition was not wasted on this paper.
Mike Schafer
Fri Apr 9 2010 11:41
The primary purpose of religious belief is to get to heaven ... each one of us, individually. Groups are not admitted or excluded together. The purpose of our faith is NOT "to create a moral system that allows humans to live together harmoniously".
Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 11:09
The NYT has thoroughly destroyed its credibility on this topic, but even if we believe the evidence they present (separately from the conclusions they draw), it does not implicate the Pope in these crimes. In the Milwaukee case the police were contacted about the allegations and decided not to act. The district attorney was later contacted, but by that time it was past the statute of limitations. Much later it was brought to the attention of the CDF (which Ratzinger was in charge of at the time), which began a canonical trial--the only thing it had the authority to do. Since the priest was on his death bed at the time, they did not laicize him, but they in no way enabled him to commit further crimes.

In the Munich case, this memo that the NYT keeps talking about is one which, if diocesan officials are to be believed, would likely not have ended up on Ratzinger's desk. Even in a normal diocese much of the administration is not handled directly by the bishop, and the Munich diocese has more than 800 parishes.

ND '09
Fri Apr 9 2010 09:45
A few things:

You shouldn't say "and probably much longer" in a persuasive piece like this - seems a bit too biased. Use "possibly."

Nixon didn't HAVE to resign, he resigned for the good of the executive branch of the government. That point probably would have made your arguments much more persuasive. The Pope SHOULD resign to bring credibility back to the Church and to attempt to move on from this horrendous and disgusting chapter of the Church's history.

Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 09:36
TJM -- Congratulations, you figured out the headline is a take off of All the King's Men. It was such an obscure reference it would require someone of your vast intelligence to understand it. Unfortunately, you don't really understand fair use, parody or satire or you wouldn't have accused The Observer of misappropriating the work of another.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 09:35
New York Times... yeah. That newspaper is losing its integrity and credibility faster than its subscriptions.
ECollins Alum.
Fri Apr 9 2010 08:40
Well written piece! I too believe in the fact-checked NYTimes -which provide document trails online -more than I believe a group of men who have been proven (see documentation) to have obstructed justice and been accessories to the rape of children.






log out