Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Hello, our name is Asiatic Gaze

Published: Sunday, August 28, 2011

Updated: Sunday, August 28, 2011 21:08

These are stories that we of Asiatic Gaze have experienced at a university that is "committed to diversity ... because it is a moral and intellectual necessity."

­— It was a night like any other night, until my thoughts were suddenly and rudely interrupted by the cacophonous sounds of a poorly-mocked Asian language. Each "ching" and "chong" scraped at my eardrums and provoked my heart. I guess they had nothing better to do. With a desire for confrontation, I longed to pursue the two laughing boys stalking away.

My friend stopped me, though, so all I could do was furiously watch the receding backs of the ignorant perpetrators, passing up the opportunity to set something right. Regardless of how many times this has occurred, nothing can prepare or protect me from an insult directed at something so fundamental to my being as my identity.

— I often wonder whether our academic community truly values diversity. Being bilingual, I struggle to separate the two spheres in my verbal and written communication; idioms from one culture pop out of my mouth and I realize that I made no sense whatsoever to those around me. I forgive myself for silly mistakes in social settings; it's different when an authority with a red pen labels your style as unacceptable. I was told that my persuasive style, my use of prepositions and my way of making the words flow together, was all wrong.

How long will we go rejecting any style other than the rigid American way — up front and aggressive? How much weight is our university putting on its own statement, "We come to appreciate how the gifts of each individual enrich the lives of every individual and the community as a whole"?

— As the only non-Asian member of the Asian American Association, I know a little bit about sticking out like a sore thumb.

In other words, I'm white. The closest I've ever come to first-hand exposure of an international culture was staying in a beach front hotel in Cancun. Why then do I subject myself to obvious ridicule by joining a cultural society that I have no connection to other than through a few Asian friends?

My answer was nearly identical to that of a college freshman attending a party at which he or she knows almost no one. I was looking for a sense of belonging anywhere I could find it. In what most would call an unlikely scenario, I felt more at home with students with whom I had very little in common than I did with others who came from similar physical and cultural backgrounds.

It is unfortunate that my experience would be categorized as unlikely, for as much as society has supposedly progressed, the same physical and cultural boundaries that I was able to "bypass" still deter many others from discovering some pretty good people.

— An Asian American friend of mine from Nevada once told me, "I feel bad for international students [like you] at Notre Dame. Many of them haven't been to other parts of the United States and think this is what America is actually like." Last Saturday I was at the B1 Block Party with some of my Asian friends. We were moving through the crowd, trying to go to the front, but stopped at some point because we couldn't go any further. We happened to cut a group of people who were already there, so one of the students behind me tried to get his friend to his side.

He reached his hand out to her, laughing and yelling, "Hey! Cut through the Asians!" What is America actually like?

We attend a university that emphasizes the dignity of every human being, and yet there are evidently classmates of ours who degrade this dignity, intentionally or not. It is simply the case that many such minds accommodate only what their backgrounds have exposed them to. The sad implication of such occurrences — especially in a generation which is supposedly open-minded, progressive and tolerant — is that too many others suffer such treatment in much more mammoth and hideous proportions.

Though many hold the perception that all Asians look alike, possess some level of mathematical prowess or have a set of parents of unimaginable standards and rigidity, we would like for the readers to keep in mind that we do not (and can not) speak for the entire Asian population.

However, it is safe to say that many others in our community share these views and experiences. We are but a few concerned students disturbed by the disparity between our university's grand mission statement of solidarity and the reality of minorities here on campus.

We also don't and can't speak for other minorities: Hispanics, Blacks, LGBT, individuals with disabilities or whoever might feel like a minority within our community.

However, we hope that they will seek out certain microphones on our campus such as The Observer to make their voices and experiences heard. Through this column, we truly wish to start a sincere conversation to assess where the Notre Dame community stands in the acceptance of the minority population.

Edithstein Cho, Jee Seun Choi, Hien Luu and Michael Swietek can be reached at echo1@nd.edu

The views expressed in this column are those of the authors and not necessarily that of The Observer. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Anonymous
Tue Aug 30 2011 20:53
Rather than debate the meaning of one sentence, the message of the entire article should be considered. An important point has been made - that ethnic and other differences are being seen by some people in our Notre Dame community as a reason for discrimination, sometimes unknowingly but often with full awareness, occasionally in jest but at times with malice. These differences should instead be the things that make us unique individuals who add interest to the kaleidoscope of our diverse culture and bring alternative perspectives and ideas that contribute to the betterment of all. By continually highlighting differences between people - racial, physical, cultural, economic, emotional, or intellectual - we only serve to drive wedges and build walls. By instead realizing the affect of our actions and words, we might rather opt to to focus on the similarity between all of us, or on how our differences are beautiful and positive, as the writers seem to intend.
Ceph
Tue Aug 30 2011 20:24
Regardless of the way one may presently feel about these four writers' personal experiences shared here, the core message we must all support is articulated in the last paragraph. Sharing experiences, dissecting miscommunication, acting on solutions, and evaluating progress can come later through respectful dialogue in the near future. For now, I think a proper Notre Dame response to the Asiatic Gaze should be that of self reflection and commendation for their boldness. Surely, one should never dismiss lightly others' experiences, and such an addition to our paper should always be welcomed and encouraged.
Kudos to the fantastic four!
Anonymous
Mon Aug 29 2011 21:43
Style is definitely a sensitive issue. I don't think the authors would have written about their concerns on academic writing if they knew they'd be caught embarrassing themselves. That is common sense.

One thing I want to mention is the representation of Asian American/ Latino American/ African American/ Native American writers in our society. I wonder why we don't have as many American writers from different origin. I think Asiatic Gaze raised a very good question that should be probed on Notre Dame's campus as well. I am aware that the First Year Composition Faculty's workshops have had discussions on this issue. I hope they continue doing so for more fruitful outcome. Until then, I believe what the Asiatic Gaze's point of view is constructively revealing what we should all be worried about.

The four of you are brave to put your name on your article. I very much appreciate it.

Double Chief
Mon Aug 29 2011 20:50
Seriously? Improper use of prepositions is a part of one's identity and correcting it is due to fear, ignorance or close-mindedness? You've got to be kidding me. Diversity of ideas is much different than diversity of execution. You want have differing opinions on politics, culture, cuisine, fashion or anything else that is based on personal preference? Go right ahead. But learning how to properly execute a sentence and create persuasive arguments is part of being an educated person. If the prof marked you down for writing something such as "I think that Asian culinary styles are healthier and should be adopted more universally in the United States," because she disagreed with your preference. Yeah, that would be screwed up. But if you wrote "The styles of cooking on the continent located north Australia and eastern to Europe, namely Asia, delivers more healthy cooking methods for the palates of humans and thus should therefore be consumed in more greatly numbers Americans by soon," then you should be marked down for writing something that is long-winded and a nightmare to try to read. Correcting the execution of a sentence isn't racist or ignorant. It's education.
Anonymous
Mon Aug 29 2011 16:45
First, the writer of the section that you are criticizing is American so your "international student learning a new language" assumption is quite unfounded. Second, I don't think that's what the author meant at all. The sentence "it's different when an authority with a red pen labels your style as unacceptable" is a metaphor for the intolerance of many toward the differences of other traditions and cultures...it wasn't meant to be taken literally. Of course no one would complain if another corrected him or her if something were legitimately wrong but it's a different story to be disturbed--not to mention, hurt--when a part of one's identity is looked down upon or not tolerated for no other reason than fear, ignorance, or closed-mindedness.
DoubleChief
Mon Aug 29 2011 11:28
If you want to keep your own "persuasive style, my use of prepositions and my way of making the words flow together," why are you taking classes? You obviously already know everything you need to know about writing. Correcting poor writing is not racist. It's education. If a math professor marked you wrong for writing 1 + 8 = 12, would you complain that you have your own way of making numbers flow together? Expecting correct usage of prepositions is not racist or anti-diversity. It's making you an educated person. As an international student learning a new language, this is probably more difficult for your. It's understandable, but it's part of studying in another language. If I went to college in Japan, I wouldn't expect the Japanese profs to not grade me down for bad writing in Japanese.






log out