Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

My not very sophisticated view

The 17th grade

Published: Thursday, October 29, 2009

Updated: Friday, October 30, 2009 09:10

 Last November, two events occurred that nobody could have predicted a year (or two years, or three years) earlier. These two events have shaped the way that Notre Dame Fans, as well as all Americans, have thought about their current situation for the past year just as they have been instrumental in shaping the careers and hobbies of Glenn Beck and Tom Reynolds (a.k.a. Irish Linebacker).

The first event was the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States. Depending on your political disposition, his election was akin to either the second coming of the messiah or the beginning of the apocalypse (at least everybody agreed that it was the Book of Revelation).

The second event (or events, I should say) struck much closer to home for the Notre Dame community. A year ago this week the Fighting Irish football team was 5-2 and about to start a stretch of games that many thought could lead to a New Year's Day Bowl appearance (sound familiar). Reaching its climax with the team's monumental loss to Syracuse, last November's 1-4 record (one of the worst non-2007 months in program history) sent bands of alums to pull out torches and pitchforks after Swarbrick failed to give Coach Weis the pink slip. 

Just as these events transpired in unexpected ways, they also generated unanticipated responses from people that intimately follow and are interested in the issues of politics and Notre Dame football. 

The election of Barack Obama, the man who emphatically spoke about bringing together a divided nation, further separated the two sides of American politics with the opposition party even more hostile than in previous years. While it's tough to dispute the notion that Democratic leaders in 2007 were rooting for our soldiers to fail during the Iraq surge, conservative leaders such as Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh have seemingly been rooting for terrorist attacks since the day Obama took office.

Likewise, while the abysmal results of last November's football games rightfully caused Irish Nation to question the coaching abilities of Charlie Weis; it is shocking to see the desire that some in the Notre Dame community have for our team to lose games. In the same way that partisan pundits have been senselessly rooting against recent administrations' efforts to help and protect Americans, many Irish fans are seemingly rooting for the football team to lose more games so that Mr. Swarbrick is presented with irrefutable evidence that Coach Weis must be dismissed.

Ground zero of this baffling movement is Rock's House at NDNation, where anti-Weis support has grown louder than the anti-Obama crusade at Fox News. Supposed Notre Dame fans make ridiculous statements that indicate a hope for football losses just as news commentators such as Glenn Beck seemingly hope that the swine flu epidemic makes reality what ABCs "Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America" made-for-TV disaster film made entertaining (lucky for me, I received my swine flu vaccine from the ever more trustworthy Chinese government). 

The most upsetting similarity between our partisan political problems and rooting for Notre Dame losses, however, is the false premise that if the leadership fails now it is more likely to be replaced later, and the new leadership will have a better chance of succeeding given an even worse situation created by the very failure these groups are currently promoting (Are you confused yet, because I certainly am). 

In actively rooting against President Bush, liberal commentators like Keith Olbermann placed unrealistically high expectations on President Obama that he has come nowhere close to fulfilling. If the Bush administration had failed to the degree that Olbermann was hoping for, Obama would have stepped into office facing even more difficult decisions to make regarding Iraq in addition to Afghanistan (decisions he doesn't seem pressed to make). Even Bush's small victories improved the situation for Obama just as each of our football team's victories this season will impact future seasons. The 2012 football season will be far more difficult for Weis, Brian Kelly, Jon Gruden or whoever is coaching the team by then if a 7-5 or 8-4 record this year results in recruiting deficiencies. 

Our ability to foresee what coach, players, or schedule it will take to achieve a national championship is about the same as our ability to foresee the next kooky change that will be made to the Facebook interface.

Because of this I propose that we less ardent, flinching and undercaffeinated Irish fans refuse to treat Rock's House as a true fan's forum. The board often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the radical Irish contingent that believes Utah is a bad football opponent and hopes Coach Weis will develop medical issues forcing him to resign. We can't have the Blue-Gray Skies and Cartier Fields of the blogosphere basically be led by Rock's House. We should cheer for wins no matter how much some fans hope for losses, and we should be happy about wins regardless of the final score or quality of opponent (unless said opponent is Washington State or Western Michigan). 

 

Bob Kessler is a 2009 graduate and the writer of Things Notre Dame Students Like. You can read more of his work at www.the17thgrade.com, and you can contact him at bob020787@gmail.com However, he will only respond to criticism about this column if he is granted a handle for Rock's House.

The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

Craig
Sun Nov 22 2009 00:20
Hey Eric - "finally on the right track"?

And, by the way, Bob: "While it’s tough to dispute the notion that Democratic leaders in 2007 were rooting for our soldiers to fail during the Iraq surge..." - can you provide any actual sources (of Democratic leaders' statements to this effect) or is this just the usual right-wing smear campaign??

John Riley
Mon Nov 9 2009 19:52
I hope Notre Dame will just lose out so that Charlie will be fired.
Neil Dube, '02 JD
Mon Nov 9 2009 01:52
Still think we're on the right track, Eric? How many more Navy losses would it take for you to reconsider?
Peter Moulder '71
Sun Nov 8 2009 12:21
I would not be too critical of the ndnation.com site. It was there five years ago that they sponsored and promoted the Letter to the Board of Trustees of ND that directly led to the removal of Malloy as President and ultimatly Ty's departure.
Kris
Sun Nov 8 2009 10:07
Hey, Bob, we just lost to Navy. Again. At home. Changed your mind yet?
Eric Nealson
Sun Nov 1 2009 23:10
I think attacking someone for stateing their opinion about ND football and some of its more over zealous is silly. Bob Kessler is a talented writer who happens to post the most interesting ND blog I have ever come across. We all know there are many many fans who want Charlie gone. I myself have screamed at my television more than once over the last few years. I was just at South Bend last month I heard the talk amongst the faithfull. I think we are finally on the right track with this program and we need to recognize that Rome was not built in a day and give the man a chance. As to this Mike Coffey charecter trying to pubiclly hummiliate Bob by denying his link just hurts your site and your readers won't thank you for it. Things Notre Dame students like is an excellent blog and I urge you all to read it you won't be disapointed.
Matt '94
Fri Oct 30 2009 18:30
No true Notre Dame fan hopes for a loss. So far as I can tell, no one on ND Nation has ever hoped for (as opposed to predicted) a loss, and no one has ever hoped for Weis to get sick or to fail (although that, too, has been predicted). On the contrary: everyone wants him to succeed, and to succeed far more than he has thus far.

I'm not sure where you get the anti-ND Nation bias from, but it's pretty sad that you think everything is just hunky-dory in ND fandom.

Matt
Fri Oct 30 2009 13:22
I'm part of 3 very good online discussion groups about ND football. One is an email group made up of my close friends from our graduating class, another is a group of alums from my father's class, and the final one consists of a bunch ND alums from my firm. The participants of each one are diehard and extremely knowledgeable (otherwise they wouldn't be allowed in the group). A few have some very good inside sources.

The consensus of each group is that NDNation is a bit of a joke. This is the same opinion I find with many random ND fans/alums I meet and start talking football with. It wasn't always that way, and there are still some good posters and some good information to be found from time to time. But anyone who thinks that Rock's House represents the views of true ND fans/alums (or those few who actually care deeply or know what they're talking about) is way off base. Most of us are not happy right now, about a number of things. But NDNation way too often takes things to an absurd level.

Just because it is one of the most prominent ND sites doesn't make it one of the best.

Carlos
Fri Oct 30 2009 12:54
More like anti-Fox News crusade by Obama...two way street.
DJ COLEMAN IRISHEMPIRE
Fri Oct 30 2009 11:24
KESSLER IS A POWDERPUFFED PUNK. COMPARING EVEN NOTRE DAME FOOTBALL TO OUR SOLDIERS SITUATION IS IMMORAL AND JUST PLAIN WRONGMINDED.GO AWAY 'BLOB'.THE EMPIRE HAS EXPELLED YOU FOR CHARACTER DEATH.
Dennis Hughes
Fri Oct 30 2009 10:16
I don't post on Rock's House, but you truly have no clue about anything posted there for you to claim that people are rooting for ND to lose. Your title 'My not very unsophisticated view" should have been titled "my clueless views"
Your name
Fri Oct 30 2009 10:10
Mr. Coffey’s claim that no one on NDNation is actively hoping ND will lose is truly laughable. I could have provided literally scores of links to posts on Rock’s House contradicting his denial of this fact, but someone at NDNation has removed many, if not all of these posts just before Mr. Coffey responded to you. I’m willing to state for the record that I have read more than 80 posts on NDNation over the past three years where the author indicated he/she was hoping for a ND loss merely to justify releasing Coach Weis.

For the record, I read Rocks House for the entertainment value. This board is filled with frustrated middle-level managers who have failed to achieve they career goals. Their frustration is vented by hiding behind a keyboard and superficially holding ND football to the unrealistic standards of excellence they desire to achieve themselves, but know they never will.

Your Friendly Neighborhood Doody
Fri Oct 30 2009 09:49
You know what's hilarious about this? Bonger posted a link to this article on Rock's House which probably increased the number of hits you get in a day, ten fold. He's going to blog about it. That's how much attention you generated here. Genius! Played 'em like a fiddle.
Joe Lipka
Fri Oct 30 2009 09:36
Dana - I use Firefox as my browser. The CTRL + the scroll on my mouse will increase the font size for those of us beyond "a certain age."
Mike Coffey, webmaster, NDNation.com
Fri Oct 30 2009 09:17
I must say, this article is rather disappointing. To say that anyone on NDNation is actively hoping ND will lose is a bald-faced lie. As I posted on the site two weeks ago, any ND loss tears my soul out. There's a difference in hoping ND will lose and believing there's a chance they will due to poor coaching. We're sorry if the fans on our site will not blindly cheer for everything. If there's been a lot of complaining on Rock's House lately, it's because there are things to complain about.

What I find most interesting is the site operators of NDN received an email from Mr. Kessler earlier this week asking what he would have to do to get us to add his blog to the list of blogs we feature on our front page. So I guess it's OK for us to send him our traffic to benefit him, but not OK for that traffic to read our material in the first place.

Sorry, Bob. You won't be getting a handle any time soon.

Dana Meeks
Fri Oct 30 2009 08:18
Some of us older than 40 have a difficult time reading the small print.






log out