Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

What is a Catholic University?

Ideas of a University

Published: Thursday, November 29, 2012

Updated: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 22:11

Flannery O’Connor once wrote: “The Catholic novelist doesn’t have to be a saint; he doesn’t even have to be a Catholic; he does, unfortunately, have to be a novelist.” In her essay, “Catholic Novelists and Their Readers,” she notes that “poorly written novels — no matter how pious and edifying the behaviour of their characters — are not good in themselves and are therefore not really edifying.”

In “The Idea of a University,” Cardinal John Henry Newman seeks to discuss and understand the nature of a University. In “Discourse IX,” Newman states that the University teaches all subject matter in an integrated way, such that the University is a coherent whole.

Newman recognizes a primacy of secular aims in the University. This may be scandalous to some who would favor a “seminary model” for the Catholic University. The University, Catholic or otherwise, is not primarily a place for catechesis. Nor is it primarily a place of moral formation. One that functions primarily as a seminary is not a University. The University is a place for the pursuit of Knowledge. This pursuit is good in and of itself, and it does not need external justification. Newman identifies both the instrument and the result of this pursuit as “Liberal Knowledge.”

The mediocre Catholic University that is only concerned with evangelization and popular piety may be subject to Flannery O’Connor’s criticism of some “Catholic” novelists: “Even oftener, I think, we see people distorting their talents in the name of God for reasons that they think are good . . . None of us is able to judge such people themselves, but we must, for the sake of truth, judge the products they make . . . The novelist who deliberately misuses his talent for some good purpose may be committing no sin, but he is certainly committing a grave inconsistency, for he is trying to reflect God with what amounts to a practical untruth.”
Many pose the question: “Is Notre Dame a Catholic University?” However, a man or woman cannot be a Catholic novelist without being a novelist, and an institution cannot be a Catholic University without being a University.

Notre Dame’s mission statement reads: “The University prides itself on being an environment of teaching and learning which fosters the development in its students of those disciplined habits of mind, body and spirit which characterize educated, skilled and free human beings.” To this end, the University has established a “core curriculum,” “a set of required courses intended to provide every undergraduate with a common foundation in learning.” These courses are intended to provide the foundation for all the pursuits of the University and to contribute towards the pursuit of Liberal Knowledge.

Notre Dame students are not unlike the majority of their peers at competitive research universities. Many students approach required courses as a series of hoops to jump through in order to obtain a diploma. This, however, is insufficient for the pursuit of Liberal Knowledge. One who approaches courses in this way cannot truly say that he or she has received a University education.

In a University, all courses will contribute to each other. No discipline can survive on its own. Specialization is particularly antithetical to the University, because it only allows for a narrow mind. The University is concerned with the liberated mind.

Can one develop a liberal mind at Notre Dame? A professor remarked to me that Notre Dame no longer has a core curriculum. It has distribution requirements. We no longer aid our students in creating a coherent, holistic and integrated curriculum. Rather, we only ask that they take a certain number of courses in a certain number of disciplines. These courses may or may not make sense in light of one another; this largely depends on the students’ selections.

Do Notre Dame students receive a University education? Year after year, seniors have remarked to me that they wished they would have taken different courses, chosen a different major, spent their time differently. They suggest that a great amount of time here was wasted. They say that they did not receive the education they thought they had come here to get. I’m unsure if this is the case for me.

Only in determining whether Notre Dame is a University can we determine whether it is a Catholic University. Yet, perhaps the reverse is also true. Newman notes: “If the Catholic Faith is true, a University cannot exist externally to the Catholic pale, for it cannot teach Universal Knowledge if it does not teach Catholic theology.”
 

Christopher Damian is a senior. He can be reached at cdamian1@nd.edu

The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

10 comments

Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 22:45
I think everyone should do PLS.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 21:50
Well, I think that most students don't know what it means to be an educated person when they enter college. That's why they go to college: to get an education (or, at least, some of them). In a certain sense, it should be handed to them on a plate. The university should teach them what it means to be educated.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 21:33
I'm not sure it's only about availability. Notre Dame generally attracts career-minded students, not just those genuinely interested in the liberal arts, research, and graduate school. People who want a guaranteed job after graduation come here, those who want a liberating education tend to go to small liberal arts colleges or northeastern private schools. That's a giant generalization, but it accounts for different attitudes to the core courses.

Shouldn't college students already be interested in the core curriculum and independently seek ways to tie it all together? Or must everything be delivered on a plate?

Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 21:13
For one thing, the University could start seriously making its core more coherent. Students generally won't be interested in something if it's not available. The main purpose of the introduction to philosophy and introduction to theology courses should be to teach students why this integration is important and to 'spark their interests' in developing a liberal mind.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 20:58
How do you make students more interested in a holistic Catholic education? Most people treat their required courses as hoops to jump through--as burdensome and boring courses rather than real opportunities to learn. What are we supposed to do to change that?
Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 18:01
Well, the professors and requirements are there. But student interest isn't necessarily there. Professors, especially graduate students, dumb things down quite a bit to meet students where they're at.

On paper the core curriculum and holistic education are solid. But there are too many options for fulfilling the requirements. To some extent you can also blame some professors who tailor courses to their own interests rather than the broader interests of the core curriculum. So we end up getting intellectually cheap electives rather than a coherent and consistent engagement with the Catholic intellectual tradition. To get that you really need to go to a Catholic liberal arts school.

I think we need more philosophy and theology requirements or perhaps a "synthesis" course in which we can think about how all these different disciplines of study relate to each other.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 16:29
"The resources are here as is the infrastructure" doesn't make sense with "The core curriculum is basically a bunch of electives now. There is no sense of the holistic, Catholic intellectual tradition" and "The philosophy and theology requirements are scandalously meager."

You claim that the resources and infrastructure are here, but wouldn't the core curriculum, a "holistic, Catholic intellectual tradition" and strong philosophy and theology requirements be very important parts of the resources and infrastructure? If Notre Dame doesn't have these things, then it has no infrastructure and the resources are quite slim indeed.

Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 11:13
Apparently his first letter was naive.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 11:06
Anonymous- You say that his letter is naive, but you seem to agree with him. Actually, some of the criticisms you give are the same criticisms that he has.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 29 2012 09:44
Chris, again you wrote another naive letter.

The resources are here as is the infrastructure. Notre Dame has a great faculty, and the number of Catholics and those who believe in the mission will not drop below 50% anytime soon. The student body, with the admissions office's preference for elite Catholic schools and legacies, will not become un-Catholic anytime soon.

The problem is, to some extent, the requirements AND, to a larger extent, the student body. The core curriculum is basically a bunch of electives now. There is no sense of the holistic, Catholic intellectual tradition.

The philosophy and theology requirements are scandalously meager. But do you think most of your peers would want and appreciate extra philo and theo requirements? As it is, they treat their intro courses like a joke, and they cannot tolerate any serious challenge in those courses. As for the second philo and theo requirements, most students look for the course reputed to be easy.

Most of your peers are not committed to the idea of faith AND intellect. For them, faith is this warm fuzzy feeling they get when they go on fun retreats or Lifeteen Masses. That's it. It is a self-serving experience, a kind of "spirituality" that makes them feel good. At the most, faith also means "taking a risk," "believing without seeing," or "turning of reason and just believing." It entails relationship with God (warm, fuzzy feelings), but it doesn't entail any serious use of reason. Students pursue faith the same way that evangelicals do in Bible summer camps. That's a shame.

Notre Dame has been a Catholic university since its founding. And every year people write letters to the Obersver and voice their concerns about our Catholic identity. And then they go on and graduate, and Notre Dame remains. Etc., etc., etc.,

I think you should seriously investigate just what your peers (not just the friends you hang out with and who go to Mass with you) are really looking for in a Catholic university. Often that simply does not match what the real aims of a Catholic university are and what Notre Dame has to offer.





log out