Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

What can body odor tells us about sexual attraction and sexual orientation?

Guest Columnist

Published: Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 13:09

Can "BO" (body odor) actually be a good thing?


Sexual attraction is complicated. While we may swoon over self-professed "types" (blue eyes, brown hair, great smile), mate selection relies heavily on a series of conscious and unconscious calculations made deep within our brains.


Take body odor, for instance. Most of us try to cover it up with deodorants and perfumes, but BO might actually help us find our best-fit romantic partners. Considerable evidence suggests that humans produce individually unique body odors, and that we easily discriminate between the body odors of different people. Even newborns can tell the difference between the odor of their own mothers and those of mothers of other infants. Thus, BO may be crucial for forming social relationships, even early in life.


Body odor is largely influenced by Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules, which are genetically determined and linked to the immune system. Experiments on non-human animals and human participants have shown that we tend to judge potential sexual partners as more attractive if their MHC composition is substantially different from our own. In other words, opposites really might attract, perhaps because such variation in our immunity makes the population more resistant to disease. Interestingly, MHC has also been linked directly to sexual orientation, suggesting that the differences in MHC that influence sexual orientation may be related to the differences in MHC that regulate odor production.


In the last article of this series, Professor Wirth, also in the Psychology Department, talked about hormones, or the chemical signals that act on cells within an individual. Pheromones, on the other hand, are chemical signals that influence the behavior and physiology of other individuals. Scientists think that pheromones are detected by the olfactory system or by the vomeronasal organ (VNO), which is located in the nasal cavity. Perhaps because this region is vestigial in humans, pheromones may or may not be active in human mating behavior. In lab animals, however, pheromones have profound effects on other animals. For example, when adult male rodents are around, females will reach puberty faster, and in some cases their estrous cycles will synchronize.


Our vestigial VNOs aside, odor may play a large role in human sexual attraction. For example, the chemical 4-16-androstadien-3-one, or ‘and' for short, is an androgen-like chemical found in the underarm sweat of males and females, and we humans are highly sensitive to it. Brain imaging studies show that and exposure activates brain regions that are critical for sexual behavior, such as olfactory areas and regions of the hypothalamus. A recent study showed that lesbian women process ‘and' with their olfactory systems rather than the hypothalamus, which is the opposite of heterosexual women.


Just like heterosexuals then, people who are attracted to the same sex may follow their noses. Consider, for example, a 2005 study published in the prestigious journal Psychological Science, which showed that gay men and lesbian women had different body odor preferences than straight men and women.
Now, this is a study that would be interesting to participate in! For nine days volunteers used only odorless soaps and shampoo, not shaving their armpits, and abstaining from garlic, curry and cumin. They then wore cotton pads wedged into their armpits for several days while going about their typical activities. The pads were cut up and randomly placed in plastic squeeze bottles with flip-top lids for easy access smelling. Shortly thereafter, another set of volunteers, of both sexes and sexual orientations, smelled and rated the odors on intensity and pleasantness on scales of 1 to 10.


Interestingly, homosexual men had different preferences than straight men, straight women and lesbian women. Not only were their body odor preferences different than these other groups, but their own body odor was regarded differently than these other groups as well. Homosexual men were drawn to the odors of other gay men and heterosexual women, while odors from gay men were the least preferred by heterosexual men and women and by lesbian women.


Many scientists, myself included, believe that these findings suggest that neurobiological processes are at work in determining our sexual orientation, just as they are in determining our sexual assignment, although they could certainly interact with environmental influences as well.


In his related article, Professor Fuentes pointed out that homosexual activity exists naturally (i.e. in nature) across a wide array of species. His observations were echoed in the cover article in last Sunday's New York Times Magazine, "The Love that Dares Not Squawk its Name: Inside the Science of Same-Sex Animal Pairings" by Jon Mooallem.

Given the ubiquity of homosexual behavior, across time and across species, and given that research has not found any effect of parenting style or childhood experiences on sexual orientation, what, then, causes people to be gay, straight or bisexual? The answer to that question will surely be complex, but an ever-growing biological database strongly suggests that nature plays a fundamental role in why we are attracted to the people we are and fall in love with the people we do.

 

Jessica D. Payne is an assistant professor of psychology. She can be reached at jpayne7@nd.edu
The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments

Anonymous
Thu Oct 18 2012 15:20
Why some religious folks are so fascinated with homosexuality is weird. And God's gonna get em for that!
Nancy D.
Mon Jan 3 2011 13:51
With all due respect to Dr.Payne, this research is nonsense and dismisses the large volume of research that confirms that those who suffer with a disordered sexual inclination most likely are suffering from a developmental disorder. Common sense tells us that not all sexual acts and sexual relationships are equal because those sexual acts and sexual relationships that do not respect the Dignity of the human person are demeaning. It is through our understanding of the Dignity of the human person, endowed to us from God, that we can know men and women, regardless of their race or ethnicity, are equal as persons and complementary as male and female, and because we have been created in The Image of God, this inherent Dignity must always be respected. Those who Love and respect men and women who suffer with a disordered homosexual sexual inclination would never approve of homosexual behavior or approve of legal recognition of homosexual unions because they understand that such behavior demeans the Dignity of the human person.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 15:47
To anonymous, posted on Wed April 14 at 18:57: The research you mention is shoddy science to say the least, not to mention a single study, and you blithely ignore the enormous scientific literature demonstrating that parenting style and childhood experiences do not turn people gay. People simply don't turn gay without a genetic influence, at least in the vast majority of cases. Reporting "more same-sex activity" is NOT the same thing as identifying as homosexual. Didn't you read Dr. Fuentes article? Please don't post google-based facts without carefully checking the science behind it. It's irresponsible and misleading.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 11:50
NOT A CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT,
BUT A MORAL REVOLUTION
Many believe the cultural battle over homosexuality is
strictly a matter of civil rights. The homosexual movement
does not despise the tactical advantages this perception
secures. However, it seeks much more: a complete inversion
of public morality. Writing in the Chicago Free Press,
homosexual activist Paul Varnell affirms:

"The fundamental controverted issue about homosexuality
is not discrimination, hate crimes or domestic
partnerships, but the morality of homosexuality.
Even if gays obtain non-discrimination laws, hate
crimes law and domestic partnership benefits, those
can do little to counter the underlying moral condemnation
which will continue to fester beneath the law
and generate hostility, fuel hate crimes, support
conversion therapies, encourage gay youth suicide
and inhibit the full social acceptance that is our goal.
On the other hand, if we convince people that
homosexuality is fully moral, then all their inclination
to discriminate, engage in gay-bashing or oppose gay
marriage disappears. Gay youths and adults could
readily accept themselves.

"So the gay movement, whether we acknowledge
it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a
sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution
aimed at changing people’s view of homosexuality."

Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 23:36
Homosexual activity is pretty normal. I've yet to see one argument against it that isn't based in religion.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 18:57
"given that research has not found any effect of parenting style or childhood experiences on sexual orientation, what, then, causes people to be gay, straight or bisexual?"

To the contrary, research has found that men who were victims of child sexual abuse are more likely to report same-sex activities than are men who were not so abused. One would think that a professor sharing her expertise on the homosexuality issue would be aware of such research, given that I found it with a five minute Google search.
But then, it's pretty clear that this endless stream of articles on the topic of homosexuality is intended to normalize same-sex activities, in a ceaseless atonement for the original Observer sin of publishing the Cartoon That Shall Not Be Named. Fortunately, the semester is almost over.

Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 12:38
Another New York Times fan... *rolls eyes.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 09:49
I'm glad I ate breakfast before reading this




log out