Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Saturday, April 4, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

Play for the green

·

It's that time of year again. Yes, it's April. And the onset of April means another thing - The Masters. The time of the year when everyone becomes an avid golf fan. It's the weekend when those who consider golf "boring" find themselves excited to watch golf for three days. People model their green sport jackets, and some dig out their golf clubs from the attic.


The Observer

The diversity debate

·

On Sept. 6, 2012, I submitted a letter to the editor aptly named "Multiculturalism fosters segregation" in which I critiqued the various race-based groups that insist celebrating division somehow unifies us. This is an elaboration of the article.



The Observer

Getting serious about unplanned pregnancies

·

On Tuesday, the Observer ran its traditional satirical edition of the Absurder. Listed in the Classifieds page was a personal ad claiming: "UNPLANNED PREGNANCY:  You're going to have to go it alone. This is Notre Dame, stupid." This poor attempt at humor is very disappointing, considering both the facts of the matter and the Observer's own history in condemning this kind of behavior. Last September, the Observer staff wrote an editorial condemning the jokes that resulted from NDSP's reporting of "forcible fondling" attacks on students. The staff wrote "For one person on campus, each crime alert wasn't a joke. It was a reminder of a situation that was probably scary and scarring. And that's an alliteration that isn't quite as hilarious." While the situation is different from a sexual assault, for a woman facing an unplanned pregnancy, a joke in the student newspaper about a lack of support can only deepen anxieties about a situation that is scary and potentially scarring. Notre Dame has gone to great lengths to promote and strengthen its resources for unplanned pregnancies. It has stressed that while Notre Dame is a Catholic university that promotes the Church's teachings regarding sexual morality, it will make every effort to help students in unplanned pregnancies with "caring, non-judgmental, professional assistance and support." The administration has particularly stressed that you do not have to leave Notre Dame, that the university will not press disciplinary action and will make every effort to accommodate a students needs with coursework and housing. If the editors of the Observer really do care about students in unplanned pregnancies, they should seek to promote the resources available for those students, instead of encouraging false stereotypes. Regardless of your opinion of the University's stance on Catholic sexual ethics, we can all agree that women in unplanned pregnancies require the love and support of the entire Notre Dame community. Making a joke out of unplanned pregnancy is not okay. To take a page from the editors, "That's not who we are. That's not Notre Dame."


The Observer

A love letter to baseball

·

Though you might not be able to tell by the weather, the return of Major League Baseball this past Sunday night unequivocally heralds the arrival of summer. Indeed, the "boys of summer" have returned and they will eventually bring the warm weather with them. Aside from the knowledge that summer is on the way, Opening Day also gives life to English poet Alexander Pope's words that "hope springs eternal." Even hopelessly dejected fans in Houston, Miami and even the North Side of Chicago can find some solace in the unparalleled hope offered by Opening Day and a fresh start (full disclosure: my allegiance lies on the South Side of Chicago with my beloved White Sox). But more than hope and the imminent arrival of warm weather and sunshine, baseball remains one of the few things in my life that never fails to amaze and inspire me. The simplicity and beauty of the game, whether played in a beat-up backyard on a warm summer night or under the bright lights of a big league stadium, is still enough to take my breath away. It has been six years since I have played organized baseball, but my love for the game remains as strong and passionate as it was the day I first picked up a baseball. Some say lower impact games like tennis and golf are "lifelong sports," but I contend that, if you let it, the game of baseball can provide a lifetime of cherished memories and invaluable lessons. I cannot help but shake my head when someone says any sport, let alone baseball, is "just a game" because it is so much more than a mere game to so many people. As journalist (and avid baseball fan) George Will said, "Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona. Not all holes, or games, are created equal." Baseball is one of life's great learning experiences as it is often one of the first games we learn as children. It teaches us how nine people need to work to become one team in order to accomplish anything. It teaches us to persevere through whatever obstacles may cross our paths. It also teaches us that it is okay to fail. After all, there are few other endeavors in life in which one can fail seven out of ten times and still be considered great. For me, baseball has provided innumerable life lessons, but only a few make for good stories. Perhaps the best of these stories occurred in the summer of 2001 when a small, seven-year-old Jack Rooney got the unexpected invitation to try out for the Ridge Beverly Little League All-Star Team. Several days after the tryout, I waited inside on a gorgeous evening waiting for a phone call that I expected to bring good news. When my parents broke the unfortunate news that I did not make the team, my entire, tiny world collapsed in on me. But, after a few tears and plenty of hugs, I found myself back in my backyard, playing baseball with my brothers and neighbors. Baseball also taught me to persevere through unexpected challenges, despite the urge to give up. When I was 10 years old and playing catcher for the Little League Florida Marlins, my head had an unfortunate collision with the ball while warming up the pitcher prior to the start of a playoff game. Needless to say, I was not wearing my catcher's mask and a portion of my forehead ballooned to twice its normal size, all before the start of the game. Nevertheless, I proceeded to catch the entire game, which went into extra innings, on a brutally hot early June day, goose egg on my head and all. Earlier in that same season, also while catching, I made the bold decision to step in front of the plate as a runner barreled down on me. I refused to let him score, though, and I held on to the ball as we both tumbled to the dirt. When I popped up, ball in hand, I took off my mask to find that one of my teeth was ready to fall out. So, without a second thought, I pulled out the tooth, handed it to my dad on the bench, and proceeded with the rest of the game (which, for the record, we won). In life, we experience bumps in the road much more severe than bumps on the head and teeth falling out, but from an early age, baseball conditions us for the greater challenges, none of which we ever expect. And when those bigger challenges do arise, I, for one, know I can always find comfort and release in the simplicity of a game of catch, the awesome power of the crack of the bat and the sheer, unparalleled beauty of baseball.   Jack Rooney is a freshman studying political science.  He can be contacted at jrooney1@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

My Notre Dame bucket list

·

With the school year and my last semester here quickly (I'm sure you'll all agree too quickly) reaching its end, more and more nights have been spent reminiscing about the past four years: the things we've done and the things we hope to do before we leave. Here's a snapshot of a few things on my bucket list I've either been lucky enough to check off or hope to in the next month and a half. 10. Make a bucket list. It's self-explanatory to say one needs to make a bucket list before trying to check things off of it... 9. Win a Bookstore Basketball game. While this may come easy to most of the athletic population on campus, my 5-foot-6 self would be better suited for a bookstore tennis match. My last shot is this Friday at 5:30. 8. Study on every floor of the library. Though you may be partial to the renovated fishbowl or the tables on the second floor, make the hike up to each floor and discover something new about medieval history or corporate law. 7. Spend time abroad. Whether it's a full semester, summer or even spring break in Mexico, take the time to see the world and immerse yourself in a different culture. 6. Do a CSC seminar. Few things are more rewarding than spending a fall or spring break in Appalachia making close friends and helping others. 5. Eat a quarter-dog 4. Regret eating a quarter-dog 3. Meet a Notre Dame celebrity. On the list: Father Hesburgh, Regis Philbin, Austin Swift... 2. Start a tradition. Make crepes for your friends on Sunday afternoons, they'll love you for it. Or drink white wine on Wednesdays solely for the alliteration. Start something for yourself and your friends and you'll feel like you've added to the already rich traditions of this university. 1. Graduate. While I'm dreading the day as much as everyone else, it is a testament to our time here and the culmination of the nights spent in the library and the Backer alike.


The Observer

Is Virginia for loathers?

·

For nearly 45 years, the Commonwealth of Virginia lured tourists through an iconic slogan, "Virginia is for Lovers." The brainchild of Richmond advertising company Martin and Woltz, the slogan launched in 1969 for the Virginia State Travel office and has been copied in various iterations by other tourist organizations. Part of the slogan's allure is the tolerant and accommodating feeling one derives when associating Virginia with tourism. Unfortunately, the GOP state legislature and governor have tarnished that imagery of brilliant openness in Virginia with another new legislative intrusion - this time permitting campus organizations to discriminate. Two weeks ago, Notre Dame alumnus and Republican Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell ('76) signed the so-called Student Group Protection Act into law.  The measure maintains funding for student organizations that limit membership based on religion, sexual orientation or personal beliefs. In an attempt to apparently protect a campus group's ability to discriminate, Virginia's reactionary initiative is a direct response against and attempt to reverse a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Christian Legal Society (CLS) v. Martinez. The high court affirmed that requiring college student groups to adopt an "all-comers" policy is not a violation of that group's First Amendment rights. The CLS at the University of California had sought to limit its membership based on a requirement that its members subscribe to a statement of beliefs as well as refrain from practicing behavior outside the statement.  Members were further prohibited from advocating beliefs considered contrary to the statement, and in this case, restricted those who merely supported a gay rights campus group. While it is disheartening that a Notre Dame alumnus elected to a high statewide office can support such a narrow-minded policy of exclusion, in this instance it is not surprising. When McDonnell worked on his joint law and public policy degree from the Christian Broadcasting Network University (currently Regent University), his 1989 thesis reveals the roots of his restrictive thinking. Entitled, "The Republican Party's Vision for the Family: The Compelling Issue of The Decade," McDonnell wrote that "government policy should favor married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators." He additionally characterized feminists and career women as detrimental to the family structure. McDonnell also responded to a 1965 Supreme Court decision that legalized the use of contraceptives. He said that "man's basic nature is inclined towards evil, and when the exercise of liberty takes the shape of pornography, drug abuse or homosexuality, the government must restrain, punish and deter." Like any slick politician, McDonnell has brushed off his past academic thoughts by saying Virginians will judge him on his nearly 20-year record of public service rather than on his academic exercise. However, his record is not one of inclusion for Virginians. Last year McDonnell virtually eliminated himself from GOP vice presidential consideration with his awkward initial support of a legislative proposal mandating every woman in Virginia considering an abortion must submit to a vaginal ultrasound examination. In another obvious attempt to circumvent the current law of the land decided by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade four decades ago, McDonnell asserts a severely hard pro-life stance since he does not support the standard abortion exceptions for cases of rape or incest. Paradoxically, while he openly supports babies, he virulently executes convicts - most notably the September 2010 execution of Teresa Lewis, judged to have an IQ of 72 (U.S. law prohibits the execution of persons with a 70 IQ or less) who was the first woman in nearly a century executed in Virginia. Appeals had come to McDonnell's desk where only he, as governor, could have commuted her execution. He refused to be pro-life with Lewis who prayed and held hands with her chaplain and lawyer during her final moments before her execution. At the time, McDonnell's decision had many question whether he was among those who truly stand for life in all situations including capital punishment and unnecessary war deaths.  During the past few years, the GOP agenda in Virginia is but one of many examples how out-of-touch and selectively exclusive statewide Republicans have attempted to overturn current law. Time and again, political conservatives pick and choose how the government should "protect" certain narrow group thought over the expansive freedoms granted in our Constitution. Their candidates avoid revealing their true socially restrictive thinking during a campaign in order to win office, and then, while in office, rear an ugly prohibitive stance against those who may think differently. It is no wonder the GOP was handily rejected in the last presidential election. Anybody can get elected at least once, especially if the opposing party nominates a country bumpkin with lesser communications skills and considerably less political savvy. McDonnell never signaled his restrictive nature during his run for governor in 2009 but stressed jobs and economic issues. This year, his hopeful GOP successor will have no such stealth advantage. For now, anyway, we can sadly say, "Yes, Virginia, there is a separation clause." Gary J. Caruso, Notre Dame '73, serves in the Department of Homeland Security and was a legislative and public affairs director at the U.S. House of Representatives and in President Clinton's administration. His column appears every other Friday. Contact him at: GaryJCaruso@alumni.nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.



The Observer

Summer fever

·

I start saying it's almost summer New Year's Day. Allow me to explain.


The Observer

The opacity of hope

·

On April 16, 2009, the United States Department of Justice, at the behest of President Obama, released CIA memos that the Bush administration used to justify using enhanced interrogation techniques to solicit information that is vital to national security against suspected terrorists. The information provided in the memos was released with such detail that several watchdogs groups, including Cause of Action, lauded Obama for his campaign promise to achieve absolute government transparency.



The Observer

Defining love

·

Last Friday, Ohio Senator Rob Portman wrote an op-ed, which ran in The Columbus Dispatch, and it has been making news ever since. This particular op-ed, though no longer than this column, marks a profound shift in the debate on same-sex marriage rights in this country. Portman co-sponsored the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and voted for a 1999 measure banning adoption for same-sex couples in Washington, D.C. And with his announcement last Friday, he became the first sitting Republican senator to openly support gay marriage. It is worth noting that Portman arrived at this reversal of his opinion after his son Will, a junior at Yale University, revealed his gay identity two years ago. Consequently, Portman has been widely criticized by left-wing commentators for his lack of empathy for the LGBT community until the issue directly affected him. While I understand the rationale behind these criticisms, I believe it is better to focus on the progress Portman's decision signals. Furthermore, I believe the senator ought to be praised for his decision because he did something that is all too undervalued in politics when he changed his mind. We rightly expect our leaders to maintain the courage of their convictions, but we must also recognize that our leaders should continue to ponder their own beliefs in order to best serve the voters, an act that will inevitably lead to some changes of heart and mind. Senator Portman should also receive praise for standing in the face of overwhelming opposition within his own party. The 2012 Republican Party platform calls "for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman." Nevertheless, Portman courageously declared, "I have come to believe that if two people are prepared to make a lifetime commitment to love and care for each other in good times and in bad, the government shouldn't deny them the opportunity to get married." Thus, it does not matter how Portman reached his decision, it only matters that he has taken the courageous step and placed personal conviction above party. Portman joins only a handful of Republicans currently in office who support same-sex marriage, and although his recent shift in position may not lead an immediate charge, I still feel same-sex marriage is an inevitability within my lifetime. In his piece in The Columbus Dispatch, Portman noted that "in some respects the issue has become more generational than partisan." This observation reflects what almost anyone in my generation already recognizes. By the time my fellow Millennials take power in this country, the issue of same-sex marriage will be an afterthought. I say this because, in my experience, it is exceedingly rare to find someone my age who vehemently opposes same-sex marriage, or at the very least civil unions. Furthermore, the denial of same-sex marriage has correctly been characterized as the last socially acceptable form of discrimination. Marriage is a civil right, and the government cannot deny that right to anyone, regardless of sexual orientation or any other attribute. I understand many religions believe marriage to be a sacred bond between one man and one woman, but since when do we allow religion to dictate policy? I too believe marriage is a sacred bond that shows deep love, respect and commitment, but I do not believe the government can restrict who can enter into such a bond. Now, the opinions I have articulated thus far may seem like idealized leftist rhetoric, but I, as well as Senator Portman, recognize that supporting same-sex marriage is in itself a conservative idea. Portman wrote, "conservatives believe in personal liberty and minimal government interference in people's lives" and therefore, the government has no place to define the love necessary to enter into the sacred bond of marriage. More often than not, however, conservatives place their own "values" (often deriving from the Christian right) above this conservative principle. Such imposition of values applies not only to same-sex marriage, but also to abortion, capital punishment and the role of religion in government as a whole, but I digress. My point is our generation has been brought up to accept and respect everyone, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status or any other possible factors that distinguish others from ourselves. Thus, same-sex marriage will become a social reality sooner or later, most likely sooner. Until then, we must remember and accept that social change comes in painfully small and slow increments, we must continue to fight for equality and all forms of civil rights and, above all else, we must love one another in a way that transcends any tangible definition. Jack Rooney is a freshman studying political science. He can be contacted at jrooney1@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Identifying the context

·

Regarding his recent letter to the editor, Mr. Crummett did not "corrupt" Mr. Damian's words; he identifies context ("Mr. Crummett's cookies" Mar. 6). While Mr. Damian did say philosophy is concerned with "meaning and ultimate foundation of human, personal and social existence," this was (1) a direct quote from Pope John Paul II, (2) in the same paragraph in which he explains that history is a valid subject because it reveals "God's plan for the universe" and (3) later followed with the statement that a goal of the philosophy requirement at Notre Dame is "to learn to think in depth about the problems posed by a life of faith." In this context, Mr. Damian's description of philosophy is undoubtedly strongly tied to religion, and fairly interpreted as a call for a "souped-up Catechism class." Furthermore, Mr. Damian's implied claim that Plato would have approved of a sign saying "Let no one ignorant of sugar enter here" entirely misses the point of the sign reading "Let no one ignorant of geometry enter here." Here, geometry symbolizes abstract thought. This is entirely different from Mr. Damian's proposal. In fact, the geometry sign supports Mr. Crummett's argument that introductory philosophy classes are intended to "help [students] reason critically and evaluate arguments." Finally, I would like to point out Mr. Damian's original physics professor example is unfair and offensive. On a campus such as ours, there are literal experts in the relationship between physics and free will. There is no need for a physics professor to state as fact a personal opinion based on, presumably, not much more formal study that an undergraduate would have (though he has undoubtedly discussed this question frequently with colleagues). This hardly implies the professor is not "educated and free," nor does it imply that he "has failed to make connections that a basic introduction to philosophy course" would allow him to make, and it absolutely does not imply that "Notre Dame students graduate more educated than their professors." That statement is ignorant and disrespectful of the amount of time, passion, and energy every professor here has put into their academic career.


The Observer

Renewing our hope in the pope

·

The entire Catholic Church has pulsated an electric excitement about Jorge Mario Bergoglio since he was elected Pope Francis. Not since the 1978 installation of the first John Paul who only served for a month have Catholics worldwide - both from the progressive as well as the fundamentally orthodox wings of the Church - looked to the pontiff with such expectation and universal hope. Certainly Francis' predecessors were respected and admired, but his humility and genuinely simplistic lifestyle somehow are uniting competing factions within the church more so than ever in the post-World War II era. In Washington, D.C. at my parish last Sunday, those preparing for mass in the Cathedral of St. Matthew's sacristy buzzed about reports of how our Archbishop, Donald Cardinal Wuerl, was identified as the principal "Pope Maker" of this conclave by sources within the Vatican. According to journalist Paolo Rodari of La Repubblica newspaper, Wuerl convinced the North American cardinals to unite behind Bergoglio instead of two early favorites: the Italian Archbishop of Milan, Angelo Scola and Brazilian Archbishop of Sao Paulo, OdiloScherer. That unified new world voting block pushed Bergoglio's vote majority to a higher margin than the 2005 odds-on favorite margin of Pope Benedict XVI. This year, Church observers should have placed more stock in the Argentine, more seriously considering Bergoglio's runner-up status from 2005, rather than focusing on the perceived public affairs strengths of Scola and Scherer. Church leaders recognized that a Vatican outsider needed to send the Church into a new direction. One needs to merely watch the manner in which Pope Francis entered and left his inaugural mass to witness how he exudes charisma like the Holy Spirit on steroids. Observers welled with tears as the pontiff briefly stopped to greet a group of disabled persons along the barrier fence. Anyone watching knows that we are headed in a new direction under Francis as evidenced by the pure exuberant joy beaming from the grotesquely disfigured face of a disabled man whom the pope gently kissed on his forehead. Ironically, progressives who want the Vatican to be more inclusive using modern-day thinking are as eager to support this pope as conservatives who prefer standing firm on status quo dogma which currently forces nonconformists to leave. Each camp pins their hopes on Bergoglio's past. For example, as cardinal, Bergoglio worked tirelessly to bridge what he called the "estrangement with the Orthodox churches." As a result and for the first time in nearly a thousand years, Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople, the Eastern Orthodox Church's Ecumenical Patriarch, attended the new pope's installation. Signs of such mutual respect and friendship warms hopes that the pope will eventually institute one policy regarding the marriage of priests which only the Orthodox permit. Hard-line conservative Catholics mistakenly overlook the nuisances of the new pope's stand on various conflicting issues. Initially, Bergoglio approaches conflicting issues with an eye on serving mankind, not unnecessarily restricting others. Conservatives need to study the pope's initial stand regarding same-sex marriage before they mistakenly believe that all of their core stances align with the pope's history. Bergoglio opposed same-sex marriage in Argentina only after the government banned civil unions as an alternative. Bergoglio chastised priests who refused to baptize the children of unwed mothers. His Jesuit philosophy remains the antithesis to the thoughts of so many so-called "traditional" Catholics. He holds that to be pro-life is to also oppose capital punishment, an inconvenience for many American Catholic politicians who support babies, but execute convicts. He does not withhold communion as a punishment of elected Catholic officials who represent their constituents' needs rather than their Church's proclamations. My personal hope is that our pope continues to invite rather than limit, remains clear-eyed about the difficulties facing our church while never losing sight of the vision St. Francis of Assisi held for his neighbors. May he use his authority to undo errors of the past. Undoubtedly, the pope's love of service will allow him to reform the Vatican's problems. May he also remain open-minded to change matters of discipline and tradition that are not matters of faith. Many who stray from the church will "come home" once the Vatican seems more in touch with the flock like the pope's namesake was in the Twelfth Century. Nature and symbolism can be the great predictors of the future. With St. Francis as his guide, Pope Francis should affect Catholics as profoundly as John XXIII did more than a half-century ago. It seems that such ominous foretelling lies within the Assisi monastery walls. Far from open doors and windows, stands a statue of St. Francis holding his hands cupped at his chest. Birds built a nest within his palms as though to validate their unity with him during his days on earth. Since our modern-day Francis lives by the same attributes as the saint, we can rejoice that the servant of God is truly amongst us. Gary J. Caruso, Notre Dame '73, serves in the Department of Homeland Security and was a legislative and public affairs director at the U.S. House of Representatives and in President Clinton's administration. His column appears every other Friday. Contact him at GaryJCaruso@alumni.nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

A new leader

·

Pope Francis will be installed in his new position in a mass at the Vatican today, and he's only the third pope many of us have been alive to see. This is a different world than the one Benedict XVI stepped out to greet in 2005 - photos from St. Peter's Square show a crowd dotted with lights from smart phones and iPads instead of flickering candles. I found out about the white smoke sighted above the Sistine Chapel when my mother's Pope Alarm app went off on her phone, and we flipped through TV channels to watch the developing action. The @Pontifex twitter account has already posted on behalf of Francis, reaching his 2,000,000-plus followers.


The Observer

Earth's biggest party of the year

·

On Mar. 23, starting at 8:30pm, I will be throwing a party, like a crazy lights-out rager kind of party.  I've got a global invite list and am currently prospecting venues such as the Eiffel Tower. Here's the thing, I need you to host . . . all of you.


The Observer

The compromise deficit

·

Anyone who has watched CNN recently, read a newspaper or spent a couple of days in the United States know that America has a deficit issue.


The Observer

Ironball Challenge for charity

·

On Mar. 23 and Mar. 24, America's college basketball teams will compete in the NCAA Tournament. Meanwhile, students here at Notre Dame will take part in an epic basketball game of their own in the Siegfried Ironball Challenge.