Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Sunday, April 5, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

Bishop D'Arcy reflects on Notre Dame

·

In this column, "The Notre Dame They Know," I will interview individuals who have been influenced by the University of Notre Dame. I will seek to discover the unique role that Notre Dame has played in their life and vocational journey. It is hoped that this column will inculcate a deeper, more honest and more profound love for Our Lady and Her University.


The Observer

So far, I've survived 'ObamaCare'

·

What a week to catch my first chest cold in several years. Many times a day, while nursing my miserable congestion, my e-mail account fluttered with apocalyptic warnings from Alan M. Gottlieb, Chairman of the conservative AmeriPAC organization about what he calls, "ObamaCare." Gottlieb's personal pleadings began, "We need your continued help more than ever as ‘Socialized Health Care Must Still Be Stopped!'" "Wow," I thought to myself. Who wants that much socialism? After all, socialism is a form of the government pooling citizens together for the common good. Who the hell would want that? But then I remembered — local police forces, fire departments and school systems are all forms of socialism. Say what you may about an individual organization or the merits of home schooling, but those particular forms of a socialized system have worked pretty well now for hundreds of years. Next Gottlieb enlightened me about the specific facts House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid do not want me personally to know. They are, "rejecting sensible ideas, not starting over, feeding on the members of their own party and when all else fails Obama, Pelosi and Reid have become true dictators as they lie, cheat and deal." In another message, Gottlieb notes, "Obama truly made history by betraying America and has become a Progressive Dictator ruling from the extreme liberal left with his own agenda." He traces the roots of Obama's socialistic past in a 1996 Obama commitment made while running for state senate to the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party. Even the socialist magazine, "Progressive Populist," acknowledges "new party member Barack Obama [who] was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago." But Gottlieb then flaunts his tireless fight "to stop the progressive socialist agenda of Obama" and takes credit for more than 1,346,016 faxes and phone calls that virtually shut down the congressional switchboard while "Democrats told American that their government does not listen to them. Instead, Democrats accepted Pelosi's bribes of power, money, promises of committee positions and getting better office space and sold out America." Gottlieb further chronicles his belief that ObamaCare: u Imposes $2.5 trillion in new taxes u Puts seven percent of Americans on a government subsidy to help pay for mandatory health insurance u Raises taxes on 25 percent of Americans earning $200,000 a year u Raises taxes on three middle-class families to pay for every family receiving a government subsidy u Excludes 93 percent of Americans who are not eligible for a tax benefit under the bill. Well, Alan — may I call you Alan, since I have at least 40 communications from you? That is exactly what the bill does, and much more. The legislation not only reduces the deficit by more than a trillion dollars in 10 years, it models itself on the initial Social Security foundation whereby several workers while currently employed pay into the system for the benefits of some who are retired. What would you like to repeal? Starting this week, reform immediately began to lower health care costs for American families and small businesses. For example, small businesses can now receive tax credits of up to 35 percent of premiums to help cover employees. This year, early retirees will receive help through a temporary re-insurance program that offsets the costs of expensive premiums for employers and retirees aged 55-64. Shall we forego these business-friendly initiatives by labeling them some form of socialism? Or shall we turn right around now and take back money we just put into the American public's pockets with this law? Now, new private plans must provide free preventive care: no co-payments and no deductibles for preventive services. Medicare will do the same next January. This year, the law starts to close the Medicare Part D "donut hole" by providing a $250 rebate to Medicare beneficiaries who reach the gap in prescription drug coverage. Next year, the bill institutes a 50 percent discount on prescription drugs for seniors in the "donut hole." It is not a conservative value to prevent government tax rebates, is it? Under health insurance reform, Americans will be ensured access to the care they need. Now children with pre-existing conditions can no longer be denied health insurance coverage. Young people may now remain on a parent's insurance policy until their 26th birthday. Insurance companies can no longer drop people when they become sick, and cannot implement certain restrictive annual limits or lifetime caps on coverage. Adults previously uninsured because of pre-existing conditions will now have access to affordable insurance through a temporary subsidized high-risk pool. Furthermore, everyone will be considered equally and have access to coverage. Discrimination based on salary is now outlawed. New group health plans are prohibited from establishing any eligibility rules for health care coverage that discriminates in favor of higher-waged employees. The law establishes an independent commission to advise on how best to build the health care workforce and increase the number of nurses, doctors and other professionals to meet our country's needs. It creates a new, independent appeals process that ensures consumers have access to an effective process when appealing decisions made by an insurer. Later this year, but technically in the next fiscal year, the bill increases funding for community health centers so they can treat nearly double the number of patients over the next five years. Are any of these changes bad for the nation? Finally, my new BFF, Alan, thanked me yesterday by pledging to continue the fight while quoting President Ronald Reagan's farewell that referred to our nation as a shining city. Gottlieb concludes with "we have only begun to fight to bring America back again. For America, Alan." For the record, BFF Alan, your hero raised taxes several times during his presidency after campaigning to cut personal income and business taxes. In fact, taxes during the end of Reagan's era were as large a percent of GNP (about 19 percent) as when he took office. The 1981 Economic Recovery Act tax cut reduced revenues by $1.48 trillion by the end of fiscal 1989. But tax increases since 1982 equaled about $1.5 trillion. The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 — at the time, the largest tax increase in American history — designed to raise $214.1 billion in just five years, took back many of the business tax savings enacted the year before. In 1982, Reagan also supported a five-cent-per-gallon gasoline tax and higher taxes on the trucking industry totaling $5.5 billion a year. In 1983, on the recommendation of his Special Security Commission — chaired by the man he later elevated to the Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan — Reagan called for, and received, Social Security tax increases of $165 billion over seven years. A year later, Reagan's Deficit Reduction Act raised another $50 billion. I will charitably call him a pragmatic politician; something Obama proves each day when he weighs his campaign promises against the nation's best interests. Returning to our new "ObamaCare," we made the correct step towards correcting our health care industry. Years from now when we look back in history, we'll wonder what all the fuss was about … and chicken soup will still be the best remedy for a chest cold.


The Observer

The wrong impression

·

This is in response to Sy Doan's March 25 letter "Christopher Hitchens is the next Obama." I'm an atheist and I don't like this any better than you do. However, I can think of several reasons why the sponsors chose Hitchens and the administration has been oddly quiet about their choice. The one that seems most likely to me is, they want to make atheism look ridiculous. To represent the side of non-belief, they chose a real-life straw man with views so radical that no Notre Dame student could possibly agree with him, so that Christianity would look reasonable and brilliant in comparison. That might just be me being a little cynical, so I'll move on. A more charitable explanation would be that the sponsors naively went with the most famous atheist they could scrounge up, without doing much research. But I know Notre Dame organizations aren't that lazy. Alternatively, they may have been trying to make the debate as entertaining as possible by choosing debaters with some fire to them. But if that's the case, why didn't they make it Christopher Hitchens vs. Billy Graham? Oh, yes, because this was meant to be a scholarly, serious affair. The most worrisome possibility of all is, the sponsors legitimately believe that the views of this cantankerous buffoon are shared by the average atheist. If so, it is all the more important that a few moderate atheists be brought to campus to speak in the future. I'd hate for anyone to get the wrong impression.


The Observer

Gymnasts competing at Michigan Madness Meet

·

Please cheer on the Notre Dame gymnastics team as they compete in Michigan this weekend. The Notre Dame and Saint Mary's gymnastics club travels to Eastern Michigan University to compete against some of the finest gymnasts in the midwest, including the University of Michigan Wolverines. If you see a gymnast flipping around campus, wish them luck!

The Observer

A lack of opinions

·

I'm a little embarrassed to admit this, but sometimes, I eat lunch alone. Until recently, it's actually been quite pleasant. Today, though, when I sat at my tiny little table and opened up The Observer to my regular source of mealtime entertainment, I was devastated. "WHAT?" I said. "NO VIEWPOINT WAR?" What was I supposed to do? I sadly turned to my phone and began randomly texting my friends so that I did not appear to be a social outcast (amongst all of my fellow solo diners). The Viewpoint war is No. 71 on Bob Kessler's fabulous blog, "Things Notre Dame Students Like," but frankly, it is something that this Notre Dame student LOVES. I occasionally find myself quoting my favorite letters to my friends, who never get my references because they are not Arts and Letters, and thus do not have the same massive amount of free time to read and re-read Letters to the Editor as I do. As repetitive and annoying as they seem on the surface, the importance that Notre Dame students place upon their obviously "correct" opinions never gets old, just like the fact that some writers think that they will actually convince readers to take their side. Highly exaggerated and/or irrelevant personal experience? Check. Tireless, contradictory references to Catholic doctrine? Check check. Come on guys, The Observer is just not the same without you. Isn't there something worth arguing about? Alternative energy? The drinking age? Torture's always a good one. The more incendiary and outlandish, the better. Or really, anything at all. Just so I don't have to read the real news.


The Observer

Students deserve preference

·

On Wednesday, I went to the DeBartolo Performing Arts Center, eager to get my hands on a ticket to The God Debate. Tickets had become available at noon to Notre Dame students, faculty and staff, but I had class until 1:40 p.m. When I arrived around 1:50, I was disappointed to hear they had run out of presale tickets about 20 minutes earlier. They told me that I could purchase a ticket at a later date. I think the University should be doing everything it can to encourage students to attend these lectures. Therefore, I think only students should have been allowed to pick up tickets Wednesday. Distribution could have been opened up to faculty and staff Thursday. The timing was particularly unfavorable for students since many faculty members begin their lunch hour at noon, making it easier for them to get tickets before students got the chance. I would also like to know why some tickets are being held on reserve for later purchase — why don't students get preference for these tickets? If Notre Dame wants to encourage intellectual engagement on campus, they should do more to promote student access to these tickets.


The Observer

Christopher Hitchens is the next Obama

·

After the rampant outrage that resulted from President Barack Obama coming to campus last year, I'm surprised that no such protest has mounted against an even more egregious enemy to the University's mission — Christopher Hitchens. Among the things that Mr. Hitchens has said and stands for: * Called Mother Theresa the "Ghoul of Calcutta" and wrote a book, quaintly titled The Missionary Position, that sought to be an exposé of Mother Theresa's political opportunism. * Is a self-proclaimed Marxist. Not like in the way that Obama is a Marxist, but like a Karl Marx Marxist. * Considers himself not a mere atheist, but an anti-theist. He is the author of such books and articles as God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything and "The Great Catholic Cover-Up: The pope's entire career has the stench of evil about it." The difference between President Obama and Mr. Hitchens is not merely a difference in degree; it is a different in kind. Whereas President Obama happens to be a supporter of policies that run counter to church doctrine, Mr. Hitchens is openly and vehemently antagonistic toward the institution of the Church as a whole. The God Debate is supposed to be exactly that, an open and fair debate. If, using the power of relativistic logic, Mr. Hitchens were to overwhelm his theist opponent Mr. D'Souza, could the vehement Mr. Hitchens possibly be allowed to win; though, I suggest we bring an assortment of mirrors and shiny objects to the event so that we can distract Mr. Hitchens with reflected light in order to prevent this outcome, just in case the debate gets out of hand. So the question we have to ask ourselves is this: At what cost to the Catholic integrity of our University do we advance our liberal education, or "illiberal" as D'Souza would call it, by inviting someone who is a vainly proud enemy of the Church? Is bringing someone who deals solely in antagonistic polemics really a responsible means to bring about intelligent and open discourse on the campus of America's most revered Catholic university? Well, yes.


The Observer

Go three for three

·

Years ago, an advertising campaign hoping to bring people back to Mass featured billboards and other marketing tools asking the question, "Can't you spare an hour a week after all Jesus has done for you?" The signs more or less meant to guilt those who saw them into getting back into church on Sundays, assuming that the reader, overwhelmed with sudden appreciation for Jesus' willingness to die for him or her, would promptly find a place of worship to attend weekly, thereby somehow evening the score with Jesus. I suppose the signs were just meant as a starting point, a way of getting folks in the door who hadn't been regulars for a while, but I always wondered about the implied "lowest common denominator" aspect of the message. So after spending an hour a week at Mass, you'd be "square" with God? "OK, Jesus," I imagined a billboard-reading-Mass-attendee concluding, "Thanks so much for your sacrifice; I've taken care of my half of the deal. It's all good." Thankfully, that approach to encouraging fallen-away worshippers seems to have disappeared. Well, this year I'm going to recommend — though not through guilt tactics — that beginning this weekend you go to church for more than one hour, but for much more. You won't be able to even the score with God — sorry about that — but you'll have an amazing opportunity to come face to face with the reality of our salvation, and realize just how eternally powerful God's part of the deal remains. This Sunday begins Holy Week with the celebration of Palm, or Passion, Sunday. The time period beginning one week from tonight on Thursday night and lasting until Easter Sunday is known as the "Triduum," a word which simply means "The Three Days." The Three Days together make up the single most sacred, significant event of our Christian faith. And it is one event, which is why just showing up on Easter Sunday will mean that you've missed most of the celebration. In fact, if you participate in the worship of Thursday evening, Friday afternoon and Saturday night or Sunday morning, you will notice that these liturgies aren't really separate events, but one continuous prayer that takes us through the mystery of Jesus' death and resurrection. We "leave off" in between, keeping vigil with Christ until the next opportunity to come together to pray. You won't find chocolate eggs or Peeps to help you celebrate the first two days. Holy Thursday and Good Friday have just never gotten off the ground commercially, but they remain celebrations nonetheless, expressing the unfathomable depths of Jesus' love in all its complexity. Holy Thursday specifically focuses on celebrating the Last Supper on the night before Jesus died, just as we proclaim each Sunday at Mass. You'll notice, however, that rather than reading from one of the Gospel stories about Jesus sharing bread and wine with his disciples, we hear of Jesus' washing the disciples' feet. Jesus' love means humble service on this night, and he reminds us, "As I have done for you, you should also do." Good Friday celebrates — yes, celebrates — Jesus' passion and death, his innocent suffering. The one who has already given his life completely over to others now dies a lonely, appalling and humiliating death, with a love we can barely comprehend even for those who persecuted him; with a love reaching out to you and to me and to all time. Whenever we feel isolated, humiliated or overwhelmed with suffering, sorrow or the presence of death in our lives, we can turn in prayer to Jesus Christ. As the Good Friday liturgy ends, it contains no hint of the joy to come. However, because we can't pretend that we're like Jesus' disciples and like his mother, who grieved, thinking Jesus' death ended the story, we keep the vigil of Friday night and Saturday knowing in our hearts of the Easter joy to come on Saturday night or Sunday morning. The Easter Vigil on Saturday night proclaims the whole story of God's loving plan for our salvation, culminating in the words to the women at the tomb, "He is not here; he has been raised." On Easter Sunday, the readings underscore the beginnings of the disciples' transformation and indeed, that of the whole world, through Jesus' resurrection. Death and darkness can never overwhelm the newness of life we find in Christ. At the Easter liturgies we baptize new Christians and renew our baptismal promises, recommitting ourselves to the humble service of Jesus, to placing all our suffering into the loving arms of Jesus and to sharing our new lives of resurrection joy with Jesus. But don't wait until Easter; begin this Holy Week on Passion Sunday and be sure you don't miss a moment of any of The Three Days.


The Observer

A plea to a mostly competent student body: True Reform

·

As a survivor of testicular cancer I feel that I have a unique perspective on the issue of health care reform. I was lucky enough to survive three rounds of chemo and two surgeries only to receive two titles. The first title, "the uni-baller" is a fun little ditty my friends like to pull out at parties. Obviously a winner and an overall crowd pleaser. (If you didn't laugh at my self-deprecation you either have no soul and/or are probably a ginger.) The second title, however, is much more serious. Seeing as I survived this tango with testicular cancer, I inherited the title of "pre-existing condition." Ironically, this title means that the same private insurance which helped save my life will help to make health care completely unaffordable to me as a private citizen, unless I receive it as compensation from an employer. As you can imagine this is a sobering reality which helps me to recognize the NEED for a reformed health care and health insurance system.


The Observer

Scholarship on sexual orientation

·

At the recent "Beyond Fruits and Vegetables" forum, students complained that Notre Dame's professors teach almost nothing about sexual orientation.


The Observer

There is no excuse

·

Last week I witnessed firsthand the ignorance, bigotry, and cowardice that persists on this campus. My disappointing experience can be summarized as follows.


The Observer

The party line

·

Last Sunday, historic health care legislation passed in the House of Representatives and was sent to President Obama's desk. As the final votes came in, the tally was a clearly partisan 219-213, without a single Republican voting for the bill. As a personal supporter of health care, I was elated at its imminent passage, but not without some sense of concern with the way it had to be coddled through the Senate and House with partisan reconciliation and party line votes the only viable political conclusion for success. After all, Medicare and Social Security were both passed with at least some bi-partisan support and were much larger pieces of "social engineering" than the current bill represents.


The Observer

A sedentary complaint

·

As I sit in O'Shaughnessy Hall for class I have to wonder who committed this atrocity. What atrocity you ask?


The Observer

Music program left in capable hands

·

In the past weeks, we have read many letters in the Viewpoint section about Gail Walton and her legacy. Through reading those testimonies, we are reminded that none who knew her can ever forget the impact she had on their lives. As Holy Week approaches, it is difficult to imagine those sacred days without Gail Walton. But like any good teacher, Gail didn't do it all on her own; she surrounded herself with talented men and women who shared in her mission of performing sacred music worthy of our faith and our community. Of these, none was more trusted by Gail than Dr. Andrew McShane, the Basilica's Assistant Director of Music. For nearly 20 years, Gail and Andy worked side-by-side at Campus Ministry, and to know Gail was to understand her trust in and reliance on Andy and his professional abilities.


The Observer

Wounded Warrior Project

·

We must increase responsiveness to the needs of our wounded veterans. The difficulties involved in caring for those who have experienced psychological and physical harm during combat are well-documented. The Wounded Warrior Project is a nation-wide organization that honors and empowers military personnel who were severely injured while serving our country. More than 500,000 troops have been wounded in recent conflicts, many of them suffering traumatic brain injuries, amputations, severe burns and post-traumatic stress disorder. The Wounded Warrior Project's goal is to ensure that this is the most successful, well-adjusted generation of wounded soldiers in our nation's history.


The Observer

Interconnectedness at the Indiana Dunes

·

As April warmly approaches, I am winding up my year-long senior thesis project on the preservation of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Now that I'm nearing completion, I realize that most of what I've learned is 


The Observer

Home, sweet home

·

The flurry of brightly colored stickers in the hallway of my dorm this week are a bit of a throwback to kindergarten, but each time I pass the fluorescent greens and oranges, my heart beats a little bit faster.


The Observer

Disability access on campus needs improvement

·

The University's historic campus buildings are a point of pride for many in the Notre Dame community. What the older dorms, such as Badin Hall and Lyons Hall, lack in air conditioning and elevator access, they make up for in character. But these older buildings lack accessibility for people with physical disabilities. In some older buildings, ramps and elevators are missing, or not easily accessed — something that is problematic for the members of the Notre Dame community with a physical disability. Many students have disabled or elderly family members who take pleasure in visiting campus. Walking up four flights of stairs in a residence hall may be daunting to your 80-something-year old grandmother.


The Observer

Shut up or get out!

·

As I listen to your conversation while I sit in the basement of the Library, I wonder why you think this is a good place to have a conversation about your trip to Panama City. Perhaps you have never been to a library before and do not know that they are not places for frivolity and conversation. Since we are all highly accomplished students, however, I doubt that this is the case.


The Observer

Response from Notre Dame Right to Life

·

As president of Notre Dame Right to Life, I would like to respond to Anthony Michael Durkin's column (March 16) regarding NDRTL's involvement, or alleged lack thereof, with the death penalty issue.