Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Sunday, Dec. 21, 2025
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

Blurred lines of Catholic Social Teaching

·

Didn't think I could relate a Robin Thicke song title to the Catholic Church? Well, as a Catholic student at Notre Dame, I have been bombarded by a whirlwind of contradictory fiction regarding a term that almost everyone on campus has heard: "Catholic Social Teaching." It is often used as a blanket to cover whatever argument someone is trying to make, but is it really that vague? Beginning with the decision to present President Obama with an honorary degree (there is a fundamental difference between the degree and an invitation to speak,) Notre Dame has been under fire for becoming less Catholic and more liberal. Where is this coming from and does Catholic Social Teaching (CST) cover these increasingly liberal University actions?




The Observer

Not a song, but a prayer

·

I am writing to urge Coach Kelly to reconsider his policy of not allowing the team to sing "Notre Dame, Our Mother" after home football loses.

The Observer

Alum's perpective on fan negativity

·

I am appalled at the behavior of the ND fans this season, especially the intense negativity of my fellow alumni. I have deep ties to the University; my four brothers and I all graduated from ND and my daughter is currently a student and a member of the band. I have lived through many less than stellar football seasons, but I cannot recall cruelty like this on the part of the fans.  Since critical voices are frequently louder than those of the true believers, I feel compelled to make my voice heard...


The Observer

Broadchurch: Lessons in perception

·

Over the past few weeks, I have been following the BBC crime drama Broadchurch (spoiler alert!), and in following the series, I have been struck by the power of perception. This series follows the investigation of the murder of a young boy, Danny Latimer, in the small coastal town of Broadchurch. Broadchurch has never experienced a crime of this magnitude, so the investigation that follows the crime casts deep suspicion over the whole town and its people.


The Observer

Life studies

·

Unlike engineering majors who explain, "I'm an engineer," us crazy, Plato-reading Program of Liberal Studies kids cannot refer to ourselves by our future careers. But if we did, we would say, lawyer, author, doctor, artist, consultant, designer, teacher.


The Observer

Getting what we paid for

·

Lou Holtz was hired as head coach in 1986 with a supposed salary of about $75,000. Sports Illustrated noted, "The money really may not be that important; the football coaching job at Notre Dame isn't something to be bargained over - it's a prize, if tendered, to be accepted."



The Observer

From panic to Providence

·

It's not often that I get discouraged. I tend to think of myself as a pretty happy, upbeat guy. I enjoy life and the people in it. But Monday was one of those days when it was hard to see the light.


The Observer

The fight is far from over

·

This past summer, my hometown high school became involved in a messy local scandal involving the termination of a long-time faculty member. More specifically, one of my favorite male teachers was fired on the account that he married his same-sex partner after the legalization of gay marriage in my home state of California on June 28.


The Observer

Beyond borders

·

This passing summer may have possibly been the most eventful summer I've ever had. I was granted the opportunity to study Chinese in Beijing with the Duke Study in China program. Since my parents cannot communicate in English with me, I speak to them in Mandarin and my Fuzhounese dialect. I started in third year Chinese last year and felt comfortable and confident enough to spend an entire summer under the smoggy skies of Beijing. At first, I wanted to go to Beijing, study Chinese, head back to New York and never go back again.


The Observer

A method to the madness

·

It would be an understatement to say America and Russia have butted heads on Syria. America wants to take military action to deter Assad from using chemical weapons again, while Russia opposes any sort of strike. This much is known, but less so is how the countries plan on reaching their respective goals. With that being said, I think this past week gave us a glimpse into their strategies. President Obama is aware that he cannot depend on the public to pressure him to intervene. The percent of the population that favors military action is merely 36 percent, the lowest preceding any intervention in at least two decades. This lack of a mandate has forced our officials to rely on other methods to create the correct conditions for military action. One of these has been the media. Secretary of State John Kerry made this clear when he said at a press conference that Syria could avoid a strike if it put its chemical weapons cache under international control. The media jumped on these remarks not only because they seemed newsworthy, but also because they seemed impromptu. The State Department added to the hoopla by saying Kerry was "making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons" instead of offering an official proposal. But is he really oblivious to the consequences of his comments? I don't think so. He knew the first procedural vote was going to take place in a couple of days. He knew the whip count, at least in the House, had more congressmen in the "no" or "lean no" category than the necessary amount to block intervention. He knew the resolution would not pass, so he looked for a way to buy more time without appearing desperate. He found it on Monday. Kerry could not have thought the idea would be implemented - Syria could not collect all of its chemical weapons in just a week - but he could have expected a response from the Russians. He got it on Tuesday, when Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Russia supported Syria surrendering its chemical weapons to international control. This gave the story new legs. It developed into enough of a distraction to delay the vote, with Senator Harry Reid doing so Tuesday until further notice. Yet, lost in this is Russia and its plans to prevent intervention. This is not because it is inactive, but because its goals are in line with those of America right now. Both want to delay military action for the short term. Nobody knows what to expect when the superpowers turn to the long term again, but both are bent on using the media in the meantime.  If you need more proof, just look at the op-ed Prime Minister Vladimir Putin wrote for the New York Times on Thursday in which he said he "felt the need to speak directly to the American people and their political leaders." When Russian politicians start sounding like American politicians, you know they're in a war of words. Brian Kaneb is a senior studying political science. He can be reached at bkaneb1@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.  


The Observer

Women in leadership at Notre Dame

·

Recently announced was the theme of this year's Notre Dame Forum: Women in Leadership. The University's press release anout the Forum notes relevance for the nation and the world, but its panel members and the description of the topic are not related directly to the University. This topic should be focused on Notre Dame. At Our Lady's University, women are shamefully underrepresented in leadership. The statistics should be provided at the outset. Among full professors at Notre Dame, according to a 2008 report, women compose 13 percent. With that said, I will focus on administrators and trustees here and discuss the underrepresentation of women among faculty and students in another column. Among executive administrators, women number five out of 22, or 23 percent. Among deans, only two of eight are female. Among vice presidents in the Provost's office, two out of six are female. Only 14 percent of departmental chairs, or five out of 35, are women. A woman has never been provost or executive vice president at Notre Dame. Some administrative divisions have more instances of female leaders than others. The president's own office, for example, has women well represented. But among executives directly reporting to the executive vice president, for example, only one out of 10 is a woman. The higher one looks at elected leadership at Notre Dame, the more poorly represented women are. Among the Board of Trustees, 15 of 50, or 30 percent, are women - the only leadership level besides the vice presidents of the provost's office at which women compose more than a quarter of the membership. Among trustees emeriti, who may attend trustees' meetings and serve on committees but not vote, only five of 49, or 10 percent, are female. And at the highest level, that of the Board of Fellows, but one of the 12 seats, or 8 percent of the total, is held by a woman. According to statute, six must be held by Holy Cross priests. The other six are to be held by laypersons. For a community of priests, brothers and sisters envisioned as a family by its founder, Blessed Basil Marie Moreau, it is strange that no female religious of the Congregation of the Holy Cross are among the trustees or fellows, as there are Holy Cross priests among the trustees of St. Mary's College. It is strange, too, that the female laity is represented as merely 17 percent of the lay fellows. The presidency of the Board, which may be held by a layperson, has always been occupied by a man. One need only glance at Ivy League schools and well regarded state universities to find executive and elected leadership with women better represented. Harvard's overseers have 18 women among 32 positions, or 56 percent; Princeton's trustees are 41 percent female; five of Michigan's eight regents, or 62 percent, are female, just to name a few. Notre Dame should be promoting women to leadership for greater reasons than keeping up with Harvard and Michigan. To be more precise, women are proposed by the Church for leadership not because of reasons or causes. Women are qualified for leadership ipso facto as human beings, created and redeemed and loved by God, and gifted together with men by God for stewardship of the planet and the Church. The Church does not propose the advancement of women at every level of society as a fruit of peace or a flower of justice. The leadership of women is a precondition for peace, of the root and trunk, as it were, of the tree of justice. There are many benefits envisioned by the Church for a society fully integrated with women at every level of leadership. Among them is a greater respect for human dignity. The Church has in its memory, after all, the scandal of the cross, from which the male disciples of Christ largely fled. The ones who remained to console Jesus, be sorrowful, and fulfill religious precepts regarding burial of the dead - in brief, the ones who did not flee when Jesus' social stock plummeted, but offered acts of respect and love for his human dignity - were mostly women. The Gospel of Mark notes there were so many women present that it does not name them all. Holy women, out of repentance, mourning and grief, became the first apostles of the resurrection. It was from these women, faithful to God and to human dignity in every act at the end of Jesus's life, that the men learned of a life unimaginably new in Christ. At an American Catholic university where the diversity of Catholicism and America is not visible, where the "equal" proportion between students from wealthy families to those from poor families is shockingly artificial, where the spouses and children of graduate students have no affordable access to medical insurance, where the shining tradition of betting on the fighting immigrant has dimmed in recent decades, and where women are outnumbered by men in leadership three to one among officers, nine to one among full professors, and 11 to one on the Board of Fellows - the University of Notre Dame needs more leaders who see human dignity. Our Lady's University needs more female leaders to show us new life in Christ. Richard Klee is a doctoral candidate in theology and an undergraduate alumnus of the University of Notre Dame. He can be contacted by email at rklee2@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Finding compassion on a coaster

·

For as long as I can remember, I have been terrified of roller coasters.  Although my house in Cincinnati is 20 minutes from a popular amusement park named Kings Island, I can count on one hand the amount of times I have been there.  



The Observer

Where's the debate?

·

Each year, statistics come out which show that the incoming Notre Dame freshman class is one of the best in the country. In addition, administration, faculty members and ND alumni constantly boast about the academic prowess of the student body, and with good reason. However, I believe this campus is still lacking in one critical academic area: the development of a politically literate community characterized by a high spirit of activism and by rational, intelligent discourse about the most important political issues. In short, no proper political forum exists on this campus.


The Observer

The almost real world

·

I'm living real life. No more St. Michael's laundry service, no more cleaning staff, no more candy bowls in the hallway, much fewer dining hall meals and flex points. I'm out of the dorm and on my own.


The Observer

Softening, reconciling, forgiving

·

It is a funny phenomenon of life that certain paths that seem obvious in hindsight were not so obvious at the time. Attending Notre Dame, for example, is something that seems so clearly to be the right decision now, but that was not entirely obvious when I was a senior in high school. It was important for me to be around my family, so my choices were set: Notre Dame, Purdue, Wabash and University of Chicago. I'd essentially drawn a three-hour radius around South Bend and limited my options from there.