Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Thursday, April 2, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

Post racial' pipe dreams

·

I know better than to expect the classiest behavior from my fellow classmates when I'm at an off-campus bar on a weekend night. However, if I'm offended by hearing the term "Chinese b****" at these locations, something tells me I'm not exactly being a prude. A close friend, Korean like myself, was walking through a crowded CJ's cautiously mentioning "excuse me" when she was called "a Chinese b****" by another female student. Apparently, this student felt the need to vocalize her frustration in the congested venue by incorrectly identifying a minority student. Her friends proceeded to stare, as if convinced it was a completely viable accusation. Indignant, my friend replied "I'm not Chinese!" and walked away.



The Observer

Proper and meaningful dialogue

·

Imagine, for a moment, that you are having a heartfelt conversation with someone whom you love deeply, perhaps a friend or a family member. You believe his actions have become detrimental. Maybe his weekend habits have gotten out of hand, he picked up an addiction or his priorities have shifted for the worst.


The Observer

From park to parking lot

·

Recently, the University sacrificed one of the few remaining woodlots on campus to make way for 700 new parking spaces. The University decided it would be best to convert six acres of a working ecosystem into its higher purpose as a baked asphalt wasteland. Notre Dame promises us action on the environmental front, but all the Waste Free Wednesdays, promises of carbon emission reduction and windmills in the world will not help ecosystems from getting turned into parking lots. Notre Dame is truly serious about practical environmental action as it claims, it should commit to halting developmental sprawl and protecting even the smallest remaining natural areas on campus.

The Observer

Christmas conundrum

·

I'm in the midst of a dilemma. I've always been one to give each holiday its respective month of celebration: October is all about Halloween, November is Thanksgiving, and once December rolls around, I become one of Santa's elves.


The Observer

Constructive relaxation

·

Friday night is rapidly approaching, and you don't know what to do. Well, what are your options? You can sit in the luminescent glow of your laptop as you stream movies on Netflix, or you can get up, head outside to brave the cold and experience some of the most accessible artistic experiences you can see.


The Observer

Remembering a Saint Mary's groundskeeper

·

On Sunday, Nov. 10, the Saint Mary's College family lost a member of its family. John Stephenson, 62, suffered a massive stroke last Wednesday and did not recover. He worked at the College for 18 years as a groundskeeper. Students may have known his face as they shuffled to class on the sidewalks that he cleared of snow. Maybe they even shared a few words as he paused from his work, hands resting on the top of his rake, to chat about the weather, the squirrels or the gardens. Whether or not students would recognize John, they should know his work helped make Saint Mary's the tranquil and scenic place it is, a backdrop that helps them achieve aesthetic appreciation at the same time they seek intellectual the "vigor, religious sensibility and social responsibility" described in the College's mission statement. I didn't know John well. He was a quiet man, and I'm always running from here to there. But sometimes we would make small talk about the beauty of the campus grounds, the gardens and the flowerbeds he so skillfully tended. I feel like a got a glimpse into his soul a couple of years ago when he adopted a family during the Twelve Days of Christmas, an annual campus project that provides holiday gifts and necessities to area families in need. Perhaps a whole department or office adopts a family, but John quietly purchased a pile of toys and other items on his own. I happened to find out about it as I worked with a news station covering Twelve Days. There are others who knew him much better. Mark Kubacki, director of grounds, said one of John's favorite tasks was tending the lovely gardens of Riedinger House. He also took great pride in having the sidewalks shoveled for the students and the softball and soccer fields ready for the student-athletes. Julie Schroeder-Biek, director of athletics, notes that while visiting teams may not be impressed with Angela Athletic Facility, they have only good things to say about the athletic fields. "It is uncommon if we don't hear the opposing coach or players say that we have the best soccer field or softball diamond in the league" he said. "These spaces have received special attention from our grounds crew. John Stephenson, in particular, made sure our fields were laid out to regulation, the lines were straight and the infield had been drained and there were no puddles in the base path. John always went above and beyond his job description of just keeping the fields - he cared for the fields because he cared for our coaches and athletes who would be using them. He knew our home schedule. If we had a softball game on a Sunday and it had rained overnight, John came in and did everything he could to make sure our field was ready to go for the team. As an athlete himself, he knew how important it was to have safe fields and outdoor facilities we could be proud of." Marilyn Rajski, director of building services, said fall was a favorite time of the year for John, whom she says was her "best bud" and golf partner. "He enjoyed planting the thousands of tulip bulbs this time of year for spring beauty," she said. "He could tell you the types of tulips he planted and exact locations. He never got upset when the rabbits or chipmunks would disrupt the tulip beds. He would say, 'It is what it is. Nature!'" Marilyn noted, "John didn't like to be in the spotlight. He was a private man. He was profound in saying, 'One doesn't need to bolster about themselves to draw attention. Just do your work and conduct yourself in such a way that others see the outcome and the pride it took to get the end results. Be proud of yourself.'" We hope he excuses the attention, but we couldn't just let him go without saying thank you to John. Gwen O'Brien    director of Media Relations Saint Mary's College Nov. 14  


The Observer

Lead a life worthy of veterans' sacrifices

·

Most, if not all, of us move past Stonehenge daily without much thought, save perhaps for the sheer amazement at Notre Dame's inability to find a fountain that won't splash everywhere. I doubt many, if any, of us give it more than a passing glance or a second look. With the exception of the annual vigil maintained by Notre Dame's three ROTC units during Veterans Day, I suspect we meander by this memorial to Notre Dame's veterans with the same regretful indifference we have for our nation's veterans outside of special occasions like Veterans and Memorial Day. The sacrifices that veterans and their families make are immeasurable. They've missed too many births, birthdays, graduations, anniversaries and holidays to count. They've been uprooted and moved, leaving behind their home and friends two, three, four and a dozen times. They've endured seemingly endless deployments and nights of worry. There have been too many parents, siblings and spouses gone for far too long. There have been millions who never returned. They rest eternally on the gently rolling hills of Arlington Cemetery, on battlefields across the globe and at sea, in graves both celebrated and unmarked. Their sacrifice - ultimate, total, complete - is neither calculable nor repayable. In honoring both our veterans and our fallen, society takes any manner of approaches. There are numerous organizations from the USO to the Wounded Warrior Project dedicated to their support. There are parades and appreciation campaigns. There are the thousands of "thank you's" uttered each day. Perhaps the single most important way we appreciate our veterans' service, however, is in seeking ourselves to become worthy of their sacrifice. Our debt to veterans, past and present, is one that cannot be paid down. It can, however, be paid forward. We are obligated not only to extend our gratitude to those who have provided our freedoms, but to take these freedoms and make the most of them. We are compelled to prove ourselves deserving of their sacrifice. To this end, how do we live our lives? Can we truly say we are making the most of the time we have? Do we make the most of each day? If we are here because others have laid down their lives to create that possibility, can we truly say we are making the most of the time we, rather than they, have been afforded? If we are honest with ourselves, I suspect we must admit there are days we do not. There are days we fail to truly earn what others have sacrificed, to fulfill our responsibility to live our lives to the fullest. I won't pretend I know what we're supposed to do with our lives. I can't tell you I know what will make a life complete or content. I'm not sure anyone can, and if there is someone, it's probably not the kid who just walked to class and back before realizing his fly was open. But there are a few things I think. I think we can find purpose in the service of others. I think we can live fully in working for our communities, our family and our friends. I think the power of the collective is limitless, and insofar as we are able to have the immense opportunity afforded to us by the tireless dedication and sacrifice of those who have served past and present, we ought to pass it on as well. I think we can find fulfillment in service of our friends, our towns, our country and our fellow man. I think we live best when we live with kindness and an aim to go about doing good. While I end up at dorm Mass most weeks, I can't truthfully say I've already found faith that there's a God. But be it karma, God, fate or whatever else one may call it, I believe doing good pays - and even if it doesn't, it's worth doing anyway. I think I've rarely regretted being kind or going the extra mile for someone. I think I regularly regret doing the opposite. I think when I look back I will value the time I spent for others far more than the time I spent for myself. I think whether we're in business or medicine, science or engineering, working in a school or in a non-profit, we can all find an avenue to serve each other. Gandhi once counseled, "The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others." Churchill noted, "We make a life by what we give." Irrespective of the mantra, let us dream greatly, dare boldly, serve tirelessly and act kindly. We all know far too many people who have died far too young, in war and in peace, to waste the days we have. Our time here is far too fleeting to shrink from the bright lights and fail to fulfill our promise. Ultimately, let us lose ourselves in the service of others, and, in the process find ourselves worthy of the service and sacrifice of others. Matt Miklavic is a junior studying finance and political science from Cape Elizabeth, Maine. He's also a huge fan of flash mobs. He can be reached at mmiklavi@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not         necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Winter is coming

·

As the first snow of the year falls on our campuses and girls from Le Mans and Lyons alike begin pulling out their Ugg boots and parkas, I fear it's about to begin - winter is coming. After a beautiful fall weekend in the bend we've been hit with a reality check called Midwest weather, and with the temperature drop comes the real seasons of Notre Dame.



The Observer

Lasting discrimination

·

The Senate will spend most of this week debating the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would ban employers from firing, refusing to hire or discriminating against workers or job applicants based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. The bill would close the protection gap that still exists in 29 states that don't have laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.


The Observer

It's all about the journey

·

Perhaps I lost sight of what was truly important all along. Maybe I was so caught up in all of the details that I had forgotten what was the bigger picture. Yet I share with you the confession that this past week has been a complete wake-up call to my life and how I approach it.


The Observer

Rainin' a flood

·

It is a tired topic of conversation, but one we continually bemoan despite our inability to change it. This topic is, of course, the weather. Just yesterday, I asked a fellow senior how things were going and her response was: "Not ready for winter." Leaving for class this morning, I thought to myself, "This rain is terrible, wet and cold."  



The Observer

Stopping 'stop-and-frisk'

·

On Aug. 12, United States District Court Judge ShiraScheindlin ruled that the New York City stop and frisk program was unconstitutional. The New York City stop-and-frisk program is a practice by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) whereby a police officer who reasonably suspects a person has committed, is about to commit or is committing a crime can stop that person and, if necessary, frisk them for any weapons. This process has come under scrutiny for failing to be a sufficient law enforcement tactic because it violates the constitutional right of law abiding New Yorkers. According to NYPD records, in 2012, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 532,911 times but only 11 percent of the stops lead to an arrest. This means out of the nearly half-million New Yorkers stopped and frisked, 89 percent - or 473,611 - were innocent, and, most strikingly, 87 percent of those stopped were black or Latino. While some might say it purely logical for the majority of those stopped and frisked to be black or Latino since these people commit a substantial amount of the crime in New York City, most of the people stopped and frisked committed no crime at all. The practice of stop-and-frisk violates the Fourth Amendment because one's right to personal security is violated by an unreasonable search and seizure. It is unreasonable for the police to seize a person and subject him to a limited reach for weapons unless there is probable cause for an arrest. To be explicit, whenever a police officer waylays an individual such that their freedom to move freely is impaired, that person has been "seized." Likewise, when a police officer is exploring the outer and inner rims of that person's clothing, a search has taken place. From this we can conclude that when stop-and-frisk has transpired, a search and seizure has also transpired. Taking this into consideration, it suffices to say that NYPD's stop-and-frisk policy is clearly unconstitutional. Proponents of the stop-and-frisk program claim that the program is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment and derives its constitutionality from the 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio. In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled the police may stop a person if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime, and they may frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed without violating the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable search and seizures. Stop-and-frisk might draw some distinction between the circumstances surrounding Terry v. Ohio, but there are stark differences. In Terry, the police officer had reasonable suspicion since the suspects were pacing along the street looking into a store window roughly 25 times. In the case of stop-and-frisk, the police presuppose that the suspect is guilty until proven innocent, which leads to a dismal arrest rate of a mere 11 percent. More importantly, the issue with stop-and-frisk is that the officers are not applying reasonable suspicion. Instead, according to a myriad of NYPD reports, furtive movements constitute reasonable suspicion. Furtive movements are not reasonable suspicion and are not sufficient grounds for an unlawful stop-and-frisk. When Judge Scheindlin ruled NYPD's stop-and-frisk program unconstitutional, she did not say it should be abolished. In her decision, Judge Scheindlin is simply instructing the city to ensure that the reasonable suspicion standard is applied in all instances where an individual is stopped and frisked. Stop-and-frisk leads to unintended consequences that seek to turn law-abiding citizens into harden criminals. New Yorkers who believe that crime is reduced because of stop-and-frisk fail to realize the self-defeating consequence of this policy: Exposing non-criminals to a world in which law is not recognized and criminality is rewarded, in essence making more criminals. The grave invasion of an individual's right to be secure on his papers and persons can invoke not only great indignity but also arouse strong resentment of the police and should not be underestimated. It is well know that the Fourth Amendment prevents unlawful search and seizures. The stop-and-frisk method implored by the NYPD is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment. The type of precedent stop-and-frisk sets is a very dangerous one to our constitutional republic. If the police deem it acceptable to stop and search someone without a warrant and without just cause, then what is stopping the police and the government from violating other rights afforded to us in our constitution?   Adhering to the rule of law is paramount. Stop-and-frisk should either be reformed to abide by the supreme law of the land or entirely done away with. If an officer wants to conduct a stop-and-frisk, then the officer needs to have reasonable suspicion, probable cause or a warrant, otherwise New Yorkers should be left alone to enjoy the freedom afforded to every citizen in the United States Constitution. Shaaya Ellis is a junior political science major with a classics minor. He can be contacted at sellis2@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Bridging the gap

·

The Great Wall, xiao long bao, mooncakes, endless shopping, Peking duck, Forbidden City, giant pandas. These are all things associated with the great People's Republic of China. This past week, 11 other students and I traveled to Beijing and Shanghai as part of the Global View Initiative sponsored by Student International Business Council (SIBC) and Peking University.


The Observer

Lines are not 'blurred'

·

Though Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines" has quickly become a dorm party favorite, I cringe every time I hear the song. Though it has a catchy beat and easy-to-memorize lyrics, it is the perfect example of how rape culture has perpetuated itself in modern life, especially in college. Thicke sings to female partygoers, "I know you want it." Never is this assumption appropriate. Nothing a woman does, short of stating it directly, implies she is asking for sex - not the way she dresses, not the way she flirts with a man, not what she drinks, not her reputation. What kind of audacity does a man have in order assume he can accurately read a woman's mind, especially when it comes to sex? Thicke claims he knows because, "The way you grab me, you must wanna get nasty." He fails to think she may be grabbing him to hold herself up straight, or to try push him away or that it was a drunken accident. He sings, "Not many women can refuse this pimpin'." The disgusting arrogance speaks for itself, as he cannot even fathom the idea that a woman would not want to engage in sexual conduct with him, since he is such a desirable catch. If he can assume this, he thinks, then why not go for it, even when the woman does not straightforwardly consent? He can "just tell" she consents. He does not understand consent always means verbal agreement from a woman in her right state of mind, and that anything else is sexual assault. He cannot assume the answer is always "yes."   Alcohol often plays a role in sexual assault. Thicke addresses this, singing, "If you can't hear what I'm trying to say, if you can't read from the same page." If she can't read from the same page, than she is clearly drunk or otherwise not in a sober state. She cannot consent to sexual activity, and to follow through with such action would be taking advantage of her and assaulting her. Robin Thicke hates the "blurred lines" that make it difficult for him to decide whether he should pursue a woman. The bottom line is that if the lines are blurred as to whether a woman has consented, whether she is in the sober state of mind to be able to consent, or whether it would be appropriate to initiate sexual activity with her, then the legal, appropriate, respectful thing to do is always nothing. What is so aggravating about the song, and about societal attitude about rape in general, is that it refers to these blurred lines as mere frustrations for men rather than as serious issues regarding legality and, more importantly, respect for women as more than sexual objects. Drunken, nonconsensual sex is addressed as a commonplace, faultless occurrence rather than as assault and rape. Further, women are the ones made to be responsible for their assaults, and they are led to believe it is their own fault because of the mixed signals they sent a man or because of their own irresponsible behaviors. Workshops regarding sexual assault are usually directed exclusively at women, instructing them on "how to not get raped." They are told to go to parties in groups, not to let friends go places alone with strangers and always to pour their own drinks. These are all good pieces of advice, and women should be held accountable for their actions. However, it is despicable that the responsibility of preventing sexual assault is often placed on women solely being taught to "not get raped" instead of on men being taught "do not rape" or "prevent your friends from committing rape." This is one of the major reasons why women blame themselves after being sexually assaulted. They think that if they had not been wearing that outfit, flirting so much, drinking so much, then they would not have been assaulted. But it is never the victim's fault. No matter what a woman does, if she does not consent, then the only one at fault is the person who assaulted her, taking advantage of her weaknesses or incorrectly reading her behavior as an invitation for sexual activity. This is rape culture, and it is everywhere. Open your eyes. The lines are not blurred. Bianca Almada is a sophomore residing in Cavanaugh Hall. She is studying English, Spanish, and Journalism. She can be contacted at balmada@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Do it for the children

·

The Student International Business Council (SIBC) is composed of many Notre Dame students who embark on projects to try and find solutions to a myriad of problems national companies face on a daily basis. Although many of said projects have a national or even international focus, there are a few projects that attempt to focus on problems faced by local South Bend entities as well.


The Observer

Twitter trackdown

·

What started out as a clever Inside Column has transformed into a full-blown Nancy Drew-esque investigation. This is Part II of an indefinite series about the identity of the @FatherSorin Twitter account.


The Observer

Wonder and awe in the game of basketball

·

In the opening chapters of "Introduction to Christianity," Pope Benedict explains there is great human tendency to reduce life to questions of "how" - science and the mechanics of situations - at the expense of "why." He ultimately draws a distinction between faith and reason: Reason is concerned with, and limited to, questions of "how," whereas faith is the means by which we are able to answer questions of "why." This reduction causes us to lose sight of the great mystery of life - and the accompanying sense of wonder and awe. This reductionism plays out in the realm of sports, where the beauty of the game is too often reduced to results-oriented mindset.