Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Monday, June 15, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

It's all about the journey

·

Perhaps I lost sight of what was truly important all along. Maybe I was so caught up in all of the details that I had forgotten what was the bigger picture. Yet I share with you the confession that this past week has been a complete wake-up call to my life and how I approach it.


The Observer

Rainin' a flood

·

It is a tired topic of conversation, but one we continually bemoan despite our inability to change it. This topic is, of course, the weather. Just yesterday, I asked a fellow senior how things were going and her response was: "Not ready for winter." Leaving for class this morning, I thought to myself, "This rain is terrible, wet and cold."  



The Observer

Stopping 'stop-and-frisk'

·

On Aug. 12, United States District Court Judge ShiraScheindlin ruled that the New York City stop and frisk program was unconstitutional. The New York City stop-and-frisk program is a practice by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) whereby a police officer who reasonably suspects a person has committed, is about to commit or is committing a crime can stop that person and, if necessary, frisk them for any weapons. This process has come under scrutiny for failing to be a sufficient law enforcement tactic because it violates the constitutional right of law abiding New Yorkers. According to NYPD records, in 2012, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 532,911 times but only 11 percent of the stops lead to an arrest. This means out of the nearly half-million New Yorkers stopped and frisked, 89 percent - or 473,611 - were innocent, and, most strikingly, 87 percent of those stopped were black or Latino. While some might say it purely logical for the majority of those stopped and frisked to be black or Latino since these people commit a substantial amount of the crime in New York City, most of the people stopped and frisked committed no crime at all. The practice of stop-and-frisk violates the Fourth Amendment because one's right to personal security is violated by an unreasonable search and seizure. It is unreasonable for the police to seize a person and subject him to a limited reach for weapons unless there is probable cause for an arrest. To be explicit, whenever a police officer waylays an individual such that their freedom to move freely is impaired, that person has been "seized." Likewise, when a police officer is exploring the outer and inner rims of that person's clothing, a search has taken place. From this we can conclude that when stop-and-frisk has transpired, a search and seizure has also transpired. Taking this into consideration, it suffices to say that NYPD's stop-and-frisk policy is clearly unconstitutional. Proponents of the stop-and-frisk program claim that the program is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment and derives its constitutionality from the 1968 Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio. In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled the police may stop a person if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime, and they may frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed without violating the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable search and seizures. Stop-and-frisk might draw some distinction between the circumstances surrounding Terry v. Ohio, but there are stark differences. In Terry, the police officer had reasonable suspicion since the suspects were pacing along the street looking into a store window roughly 25 times. In the case of stop-and-frisk, the police presuppose that the suspect is guilty until proven innocent, which leads to a dismal arrest rate of a mere 11 percent. More importantly, the issue with stop-and-frisk is that the officers are not applying reasonable suspicion. Instead, according to a myriad of NYPD reports, furtive movements constitute reasonable suspicion. Furtive movements are not reasonable suspicion and are not sufficient grounds for an unlawful stop-and-frisk. When Judge Scheindlin ruled NYPD's stop-and-frisk program unconstitutional, she did not say it should be abolished. In her decision, Judge Scheindlin is simply instructing the city to ensure that the reasonable suspicion standard is applied in all instances where an individual is stopped and frisked. Stop-and-frisk leads to unintended consequences that seek to turn law-abiding citizens into harden criminals. New Yorkers who believe that crime is reduced because of stop-and-frisk fail to realize the self-defeating consequence of this policy: Exposing non-criminals to a world in which law is not recognized and criminality is rewarded, in essence making more criminals. The grave invasion of an individual's right to be secure on his papers and persons can invoke not only great indignity but also arouse strong resentment of the police and should not be underestimated. It is well know that the Fourth Amendment prevents unlawful search and seizures. The stop-and-frisk method implored by the NYPD is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment. The type of precedent stop-and-frisk sets is a very dangerous one to our constitutional republic. If the police deem it acceptable to stop and search someone without a warrant and without just cause, then what is stopping the police and the government from violating other rights afforded to us in our constitution?   Adhering to the rule of law is paramount. Stop-and-frisk should either be reformed to abide by the supreme law of the land or entirely done away with. If an officer wants to conduct a stop-and-frisk, then the officer needs to have reasonable suspicion, probable cause or a warrant, otherwise New Yorkers should be left alone to enjoy the freedom afforded to every citizen in the United States Constitution. Shaaya Ellis is a junior political science major with a classics minor. He can be contacted at sellis2@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.

The Observer

Bridging the gap

·

The Great Wall, xiao long bao, mooncakes, endless shopping, Peking duck, Forbidden City, giant pandas. These are all things associated with the great People's Republic of China. This past week, 11 other students and I traveled to Beijing and Shanghai as part of the Global View Initiative sponsored by Student International Business Council (SIBC) and Peking University.


The Observer

Lines are not 'blurred'

·

Though Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines" has quickly become a dorm party favorite, I cringe every time I hear the song. Though it has a catchy beat and easy-to-memorize lyrics, it is the perfect example of how rape culture has perpetuated itself in modern life, especially in college. Thicke sings to female partygoers, "I know you want it." Never is this assumption appropriate. Nothing a woman does, short of stating it directly, implies she is asking for sex - not the way she dresses, not the way she flirts with a man, not what she drinks, not her reputation. What kind of audacity does a man have in order assume he can accurately read a woman's mind, especially when it comes to sex? Thicke claims he knows because, "The way you grab me, you must wanna get nasty." He fails to think she may be grabbing him to hold herself up straight, or to try push him away or that it was a drunken accident. He sings, "Not many women can refuse this pimpin'." The disgusting arrogance speaks for itself, as he cannot even fathom the idea that a woman would not want to engage in sexual conduct with him, since he is such a desirable catch. If he can assume this, he thinks, then why not go for it, even when the woman does not straightforwardly consent? He can "just tell" she consents. He does not understand consent always means verbal agreement from a woman in her right state of mind, and that anything else is sexual assault. He cannot assume the answer is always "yes."   Alcohol often plays a role in sexual assault. Thicke addresses this, singing, "If you can't hear what I'm trying to say, if you can't read from the same page." If she can't read from the same page, than she is clearly drunk or otherwise not in a sober state. She cannot consent to sexual activity, and to follow through with such action would be taking advantage of her and assaulting her. Robin Thicke hates the "blurred lines" that make it difficult for him to decide whether he should pursue a woman. The bottom line is that if the lines are blurred as to whether a woman has consented, whether she is in the sober state of mind to be able to consent, or whether it would be appropriate to initiate sexual activity with her, then the legal, appropriate, respectful thing to do is always nothing. What is so aggravating about the song, and about societal attitude about rape in general, is that it refers to these blurred lines as mere frustrations for men rather than as serious issues regarding legality and, more importantly, respect for women as more than sexual objects. Drunken, nonconsensual sex is addressed as a commonplace, faultless occurrence rather than as assault and rape. Further, women are the ones made to be responsible for their assaults, and they are led to believe it is their own fault because of the mixed signals they sent a man or because of their own irresponsible behaviors. Workshops regarding sexual assault are usually directed exclusively at women, instructing them on "how to not get raped." They are told to go to parties in groups, not to let friends go places alone with strangers and always to pour their own drinks. These are all good pieces of advice, and women should be held accountable for their actions. However, it is despicable that the responsibility of preventing sexual assault is often placed on women solely being taught to "not get raped" instead of on men being taught "do not rape" or "prevent your friends from committing rape." This is one of the major reasons why women blame themselves after being sexually assaulted. They think that if they had not been wearing that outfit, flirting so much, drinking so much, then they would not have been assaulted. But it is never the victim's fault. No matter what a woman does, if she does not consent, then the only one at fault is the person who assaulted her, taking advantage of her weaknesses or incorrectly reading her behavior as an invitation for sexual activity. This is rape culture, and it is everywhere. Open your eyes. The lines are not blurred. Bianca Almada is a sophomore residing in Cavanaugh Hall. She is studying English, Spanish, and Journalism. She can be contacted at balmada@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Do it for the children

·

The Student International Business Council (SIBC) is composed of many Notre Dame students who embark on projects to try and find solutions to a myriad of problems national companies face on a daily basis. Although many of said projects have a national or even international focus, there are a few projects that attempt to focus on problems faced by local South Bend entities as well.


The Observer

Twitter trackdown

·

What started out as a clever Inside Column has transformed into a full-blown Nancy Drew-esque investigation. This is Part II of an indefinite series about the identity of the @FatherSorin Twitter account.


The Observer

Wonder and awe in the game of basketball

·

In the opening chapters of "Introduction to Christianity," Pope Benedict explains there is great human tendency to reduce life to questions of "how" - science and the mechanics of situations - at the expense of "why." He ultimately draws a distinction between faith and reason: Reason is concerned with, and limited to, questions of "how," whereas faith is the means by which we are able to answer questions of "why." This reduction causes us to lose sight of the great mystery of life - and the accompanying sense of wonder and awe. This reductionism plays out in the realm of sports, where the beauty of the game is too often reduced to results-oriented mindset.


The Observer

From bad to good: a change of heart

·

Hello, my name is ConorHoulihan, and I was "Breaking Bad" addict. I am finally free of this show's bonds thanks to Carter Boyd's Viewpoint column, "Breaking Bad: five seasons of sin," (Oct. 14) which I thankfully read before going back to watch another episode on Netflix. (I think it was the one where Walter and Jesse made meth.)


The Observer

A celebration, not a defamation

·

I am recent graduate of Class of 2013, an alumnus of Knott Hall and the founder of the Knott Hall Americana Dance. When I read Grace Chiarella's comments on what is unarguably the best dance at Notre Dame ('SYR themes disrespect rural poverty,' Oct. 14,) I felt compelled to respond - after all, no one knows the ins-and-outs of this dance better than I do.


The Observer

When control becomes destructive

·

As students attending one of the most prestigious universities in the country, we tirelessly attempt to find balance among classes, exercise, work, papers, projects, extracurricular activities and a social life. It is very easy to get caught up in deadlines and stress, so last week's Irish State of Mind provided the student body with a variety of opportunities to reflect on mental health issues and the importance of self-care.


The Observer

Ring by spring is still a thing?

·

A recent CollegeMagazine.com article has ranked Notre Dame as among the top 10 universities for finding a husband. It says, "College is totally just about finding the perfect man, right?" Granted, the online magazine hosts a mixture of "serious" and "funny" articles, so it is hard to tell whether or not the author was serious. As a sane, self-respecting woman, however, I still have to say that if this statement does not make you sick, then nothing will.


The Observer

Don't ask, don't tell'

·

Notre Dame prides itself in being a place of unity, family and acceptance. But in my year of being a student here I have never encountered individuals of such a great degree of ethnic ignorance, socio-economic privilege and self-absorbed blissfulness, which is saying a lot considering that I was raised in affectionately named "Orange Curtain" Orange County, Calif. Despite the large possibility of offending the greater student population, I am going to address what we would all love to remain silent about: the minority of students who insist on exercising their freedom of speech to reveal great moral character.


The Observer

Finding love in a hopeless place

·

Just about a week ago, I stepped in for a religion teacher who needed a "pinch-hitter" for a class period one day at Roncalli, the high school to which I am assigned in Indianapolis. Confused faces turned to joy as the students 1) realized that I was not their regular teacher and 2) gave themselves permission to continue huddling up with their friends and talking. I might as well have not been in the room.


The Observer

Blurred lines of Catholic Social Teaching

·

Didn't think I could relate a Robin Thicke song title to the Catholic Church? Well, as a Catholic student at Notre Dame, I have been bombarded by a whirlwind of contradictory fiction regarding a term that almost everyone on campus has heard: "Catholic Social Teaching." It is often used as a blanket to cover whatever argument someone is trying to make, but is it really that vague? Beginning with the decision to present President Obama with an honorary degree (there is a fundamental difference between the degree and an invitation to speak,) Notre Dame has been under fire for becoming less Catholic and more liberal. Where is this coming from and does Catholic Social Teaching (CST) cover these increasingly liberal University actions?




The Observer

Not a song, but a prayer

·

I am writing to urge Coach Kelly to reconsider his policy of not allowing the team to sing "Notre Dame, Our Mother" after home football loses.


The Observer

Alum's perpective on fan negativity

·

I am appalled at the behavior of the ND fans this season, especially the intense negativity of my fellow alumni. I have deep ties to the University; my four brothers and I all graduated from ND and my daughter is currently a student and a member of the band. I have lived through many less than stellar football seasons, but I cannot recall cruelty like this on the part of the fans.  Since critical voices are frequently louder than those of the true believers, I feel compelled to make my voice heard...