Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Monday, June 15, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

The right decision

·

Since 1970, the New York Marathon has been one of the Big Apple's most hallowed traditions. An estimated 47,000 runners, 12,000 volunteers and 2.5 million spectators take part in the annual 26.2-mile race through all five city boroughs. Not this year. After the devastation of Hurricane Sandy, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg made the final call to cancel the race in a decision that was undoubtedly the right one.



The Observer

Thank you, Maem!

·

In St. Ed's, we live a little messily. Sometimes our trash overflows, every once in a while we leave food in the lounge and at the year's beginning we flood the halls with sawdust. God knows we're a nightmare to clean up after. Even though we don't deserve her, we're lucky enough to have MaemDetaksone.


The Observer

Freshmen rushed it

·

Hey freshmen, You guys did a great job rushing the field on Saturday. After a win like that, rushing the field was definitely appropriate. As you all know, the Wake Forest game is the last home game of the season. Traditionally, the seniors rush the field after the game since it is their last home game as students. However, since you all are so experienced at rushing the field (having done it twice now, first against a lower-ranked Stanford team and then against an unranked Pittsburgh team) we would love it if you rushed the field after the Wake Forest game, win or lose. It would certainly add to the atmosphere. Unfortunately, you have already used up all of your field-rushes for the year, so this will have to be a senior-only affair. Brett Straka senior Siegfried Hall Nov. 5

The Observer

A race to remember

·

As I write this, the excitement of the 2012 election is reaching its peak. Within the last week I have heard plenty of disgruntled citizens saying they "cannot wait for the election to be over" and they're "sick of all the advertisements on TV."


The Observer

Keep Douglas Road safe

·

To the Editor: We live at University Village, home of Notre Dame's graduate student families, and we are stakeholders in this University that we love. Notre Dame is proposing to expand and reroute Douglas Road directly in front of where we live. It is very likely that this proposal will be approved by the county. After hearing a presentation from representatives of the University on Oct. 9, we had numerous concerns about how the new four-lane highway would affect us. The safety of our families is of primary importance. In particular,  we are concerned about crossing a busy four-lane highway without proper safety measures in place. On Oct. 17, we met with John Affleck-Graves, Executive Vice President, and Erin Hoffman Harding, Vice President of Student Affairs. After assuring us that family housing is a priority for Notre Dame, they requested specific proposals to diminish the impact of the new road on our community. The proposal we submitted this week calls for measures to keep vehicle speeds below 35 mph, an important safety threshold, as well as a crosswalk with sufficient safety features. Further, the proposed road follows a straight line passing about 150 feet from our homes and where our children play. If the road were more curved, traffic could be naturally slowed and more green space at the Village could be preserved. We are currently working with the administration on these and other proposals and we encourage other members of the Notre Dame community to be aware of, and involved in, this important project that will shape the university's future for years to come. Simone and Wes Hamrick graduate students University Village Nov. 5             Angela and Peter Campbell graduate students University Village Nov. 5


The Observer

Lessons from Peking University

·

Every time I tell people that I was in China over fall break, I get the same surprised response: "Why in the world did you go all the way to China?" I'm not sure if it's the fact that a group of us went abroad for a school trip, or simply the fact that we went to China leads to such a response, but it truly was one of the most rewarding experiences I, and everyone else on the trip, have had at Notre Dame. I am so glad that this project has come to fruition in a very short amount of time, and hopefully will be a start to greater initiatives and continued relationships between schools in different countries. This trip to Peking University was such a memorable week. We climbed the Great Wall of China, ate Peking Duck at the Forbidden City, prepared for our case projects with Chinese students at internet cafes off campus, visited well-known Chinese companies and bargained for Chinese souvenirs (and street food). It was also challenging because it was many of the students' first time in China and, beyond the language barriers, there were the various degrees of cultural differences. While this was a big part of the challenge, it was also the single factor that made this trip so rewarding. Most of us agreed that the best part of the trip was the opportunity to meet and make new friends with students from Peking University. Junior Bobby Weltner said, "It was extremely interesting to learn about the similarities and differences between our two cultures and to discuss the different ways that the American and Chinese students viewed the issues that were presented to us in the case competition." Sophomore Alisha Anderson said in her group, they had to explain that "gambler" cannot be used interchangeably for "investor" and that there really is a difference between "supply chain" and "value chain." We all learned so much from conversations like these, and we hope they will lead to a stronger long-term relationship with Peking University students. Overall, it was gratifying to see how delegates from both teams were willing to work together and accept differences in thinking and presenting, and, in the process, learn more about each other. Beyond the research everyone did on the industry and case topic, I would say the time spent working with the Chinese students was very informative and valuable. Sophomore John Reising said, "The time spent in Beijing opened a different perspective on viewing the world. Traveling abroad and leaving the enclosed bubble surrounding the United States and especially Notre Dame is a valuable asset to have." At a time when there is so much global attention directed towards China and its rapid economic growth, the combination of case competition, city excursions and company visits provided a great opportunity for everyone on the trip to witness this phenomenon first-hand and learn more about the crucial role China plays in the international economy.     The SIBC is the largest student-run organization on campus with over 400 active members. We seek to promote "Peace through Commerce" by partnering with leading companies across all areas of business and providing international internships for our members. We can be reached at sibc@nd.edu or at sibc.nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

One more month

·

Friends, Smicks, communication studies majors, lend me your ears and eyes. Finally, I have seven words that guarantee a smile will spread across your faces: One month until senior comprehensives are done! Yes, that is correct; only about one more month until we all gather into Vander VennetTheatre in the basement of the Student Center for three whole nights of presentations by our peers. As we enter this final month of preparations, I encourage you to remember that soon we will sigh a breath of relief as our comprehensives come together with the finishing touches before our very eyes. All the hard work, sweat and tears that we have poured into (and maybe onto) our projects will be worth it once that eight-minute presentation is over. Just think back to last semester, when we were second-semester juniors, dreaming of the day our senior comps would commence, picking topics and writing literature reviews. Those were the days. As we look back from where we began to where we are now, one month stands in our way of that buzz our professors call "senioritis." This next month will be intense. Many of us will find our walls of mental strength begin to crack. But fear not, friends, we will prevail in the end. Forget about the next few weekends being the busiest you've ever had. Forget about the upcoming weeks being cramped with finals preparation. Forget that you may not end up at Brothers or O'Rourke's until spring semester. You are almost there. You must keep going; you must not quit. My fellow communication majors, we are almost there. So close to the end that you can smell the sweet scent of freedom knocking on our doors. All will be right in the world once again, just keep on going my friends. CJ's and Finny's will have to wait. The bouncer with the bar handle mustache will understand. We must keep going; we must not quit. Smicks, I know you can do this. I have faith in you. I am rooting for you all like you are all rooting for me. We have to stick together and finish what we came to Saint Mary's to do. That clock is ticking. Once it hits the end, graduation day is here. Only one more month to go, ladies. One more month and we will be on our way to the "real world." Friends, let's get this done. Let's finish these comps. Let's celebrate because we deserve to. Only one more month! We can do it. Contact Jillian Barwick at jbarwi01@saintmarys.edu The views expressed in the Inside Column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.  


The Observer

Re-elect Barack Obama

·

"This is our moment. This is our time - to put our people back to work and open doors of opportunity for our kids; to restore prosperity and promote the cause of peace; to reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth - that out of many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope, and where we are met with cynicism and doubt and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes, we can." This is an excerpt from the victory speech delivered by President-elect Barack Obama at Grant Park in Chicago, Ill. It was seen as a historic night not only because America had elected their first African-American president, but also because they elected a man who had the ability to be a "transformative president." Four years later, many people do not believe, or are unsure if Barack Obama should be re-elected. To those, I present the case to re-elect President Barack Obama. Obama came into office in the middle of the worst economic crisis in our lifetime. The stock market had declined from its high of over 14,000 points in October 2007 to 7,949 the day he took office. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the economy contracted at a rate of nine percent, and when he took office it was contracting at a rate of seven percent. In the first three months of his presidency, the economy lost an average of 750,000 jobs. While politically unpopular, the Recovery Act (better known as the stimulus) helped stop the decline through tax breaks, infrastructure projects and assistance to states. Within months, the economy had come back from the brink and was growing. Jobs growth would come later - albeit not as strongly as hoped. The CBO estimated that as a result of the stimulus, between 1.5 and 3.3 million more people were employed, unemployment was between 0.7 and 1.7 percent lower than it would have been without it and the level of GDP was higher by up to 4.5 percent. Against political advice and lessons from history, Obama took on health care reform. Many people believe that this was a mistake during an economic downturn. But these people are misinformed. America's health care system is a ticking time bomb that needs reform, and the only time a president can do it is in his first two years in office. Health care reform has been attempted by seven other presidents, including FDR. All have failed, but Obama succeeded in pushing for universal coverage while helping contain costs in the long term. Obama has many other successes. He restructured the auto industry, which helped provide liquidity during the worst of the recession when private firms - like Bain Capital - would not loan money. Obama passed the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and was within striking distance of a historic long-term deficit reduction deal with House Speaker John Boehner that ended due to Tea Party opposition. Moreover, Obama has pursued an excellent foreign policy. He has overseen the removal of American troops from Iraq and created the framework to bring troops home from Afghanistan in 2014. His preference for targeted drone strikes versus large-scale occupations has been a much better use of American resources at a time when Americans are tired after a decade of war. His shift of resources from the Middle East to the Pacific reflects a 21st-century foreign policy that will balance the rise of China. With that being said, his greatest accomplishment was overseeing the mission to kill Bin Laden. Many wrongly believe that this was an easy call. Many of Obama's advisors - CIA chief Leon Panetta, Defense Secretary Bob Gates and Vice President Joe Biden all advised against it at that time. A failed mission with American deaths and no Bin Laden would have meant plummeting poll numbers.   Obama should not just be re-elected for what has done, but for what he will do. Reports suggest that the Obama administration will gear up for one last reform - most likely the immigration system, by humanely dealing with the 12 million undocumented immigrants who are here now. Obama came into office at a time of economic crisis. He not only led us out of it, but he also began to lay the framework for a 21st-century economy and executed a brilliant foreign policy. In terms of accomplishments, leadership and vision, there is no doubt that Obama should serve another term as the president of the United States. Adam Newman is a senior political science major. He can be reached at anewman3@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Futon thoughts

·

As I lay sprawled on my futon for the third time in a day, making no attempt to do work, I can't help but feel a little bit like a loser. Self-diagnosed with a sprinkle of "senioritis," a smidge of laziness and a more concerning, stronger dose of overall apathy to my own life and its direction, I picture my mind as a small, eerie shack atop a steep hill. The lights are off, it's freezing; my own Frankenstorm has commenced. Maybe it's typical of this time in life, with graduation so imminent, to feel so vehemently exhilarated and so overwhelmingly apprehensive. Instead of allowing myself to process any of that, though, for the past few months I've watched the lights in that shack flicker weakly, finally burning out. What is this apathy I've been feeling? The disconnect not only to the world, but to people in it? Not returning calls, not finishing homework on time, not starting applications for things I truly do want. A dreary, self-pitying perma-cloud over my own melting brain. What's changed? I've begun to realize that the pursuit of excellence, happiness and efficacy is not some flowery, cartoon thought-bubble over a little girl in a jean jumper anymore. My dreams and desires sit just over the ledge of the infinity pool of my own childhood and security. Maybe it's time to dip my toe into the ocean. Maybe I'm more alive than I think. Creating bucket lists and actually doing them. Finally body-painting for a game. Endless conversation and spontaneity with the best of friends about matters of critical importance (memes oddly fitting to your own life) or the real hurts of growing up. Life is beautiful and truly a gift. And although sometimes I feel myself shrinking away, shirking responsibility and spiraling toward that futon again, I remember to turn the lights back on. Just like every one of you, I am special and I offer something lovely to this world. I'm finally starting to realize that I'm ready to do something. Nothing is going to stop me. Erin Rosario senior Pasquerilla East Hall Nov. 4


The Observer

Too indecisive

·

I can't make decisions. I can't decide if this column is the worst thing I've ever written, or if the two papers I handed in this morning deserve that honor. We'll let my professors decide that one. I can't decide if I want to fast-forward to May so I can graduate and become a real person with a real life, or if I want to rewind to the start of freshman year and redo my entire college experience. I can't decide if I should get a goldfish or a potted cactus. I'd probably inadvertently kill both. I can't decide if I should put on a sweater and turn off the radiator in my room, or if I should pretend that climate change isn't real so I can continue to wear shorts indoors. I can't decide if I want it to snow already so I can wear sweaters and scarves or if I want to transplant campus to a tropical island so I can go to the beach every day after class. I can't decide if I need to do laundry tomorrow or if I can stretch my wardrobe for another week. I can't decide which shoes to wear tomorrow. But I can tell you they will not be Uggs. I can't decide if whale sharks are real animals or if someone just made them up as a joke. I can't decide if the new Taco Bell in LaFortune is the best or worst thing to ever happen to this campus. I can't decide if there's something unnatural about Notre Dame squirrels or if they are just really cute. I can't decide if I should get off the couch and find my laptop charger or race the remaining battery life. Yes, I am that lazy. I can't decide if I should go to the dining hall at 6:30 p.m. and brave the crowds or go to Reckers and be underwhelmed by the menu. I can't decide if I should go to Feve tonight or go to sleep before 3 a.m. in the morning. I can't decide if I should drink coffee or diet Coke for my next caffeine boost. I can't decide if I should sleep through my first class tomorrow or sleep during my first class tomorrow. I can't decide if I'm jealous of everyone who's getting ring-by-Thanksgiving-ed or if I would rather wait until someone financially-secure enough gives me a rock the size of my fingernail. I can't decide if our football team is actually any good or if arranging my Christmas schedule around a Jan. 7 game is just wishful thinking. Knock on wood. I can't decide if I should finish this column or delete it all and start over. Again.  


The Observer

The whole ballot

·

At this point, you might be sick of hearing about the election. Whether you're trying to watch television, scroll through your Twitter feed or even just listen to some music on Pandora, the presidential election seems to be dominating every conversation as the contest hits fever pitch less than a week before Election Day. While the contest for the Oval Office draws nearly every headline, it's only a part of why Tuesday is important. If there's anything presidential history has taught us, it's that the President's agenda only goes so far - for Congress shapes what the White House can and cannot do. And if you've only been following the top item on the ballot, you're missing out on what's truly important. This election goes far beyond Washington. Races for state legislatures, governorships, judicial positions, ballot issues and even county sheriffs all matter to the way you live your daily life. Think about it: Schools, roads, police and almost all of the other ways we encounter government on a daily basis depend more on the state and local officials we elect than how the President deals with the Departments of Education, Transportation and Homeland Security. We often hear from our classmates that voting simply doesn't matter. Perhaps you might be from a solid red state or a consistently blue one, and because the outcome of your state's electoral votes won't be a surprise, you might think your vote doesn't matter out of the millions that will be cast. No matter how your vote plays into the presidential election, that sentiment is simply not true on state and local levels. In state elections, turnout is more often measured in the thousands; in local ones, it's often in the hundreds. Your vote absolutely matters in those races - and it matters in the day-to-day issues that affect you most. Across the country, 176 referendums in 38 states - including several on medical marijuana, tax policy and health care - are up for vote. Gay marriage is on the ballot in four different states this year. The U.S. Senate majority could be overturned if a few undecided states swing red. The governor you put in office is responsible for appointing your state's judges and approving your state's budget. States all around the country have the chance to break new ground on issues that matter - just because not all of them came up in the three televised presidential debate doesn't mean they're not valuable issues. Your voice matters here too. The principle is the same as when you get involved and make your mark on campus; even the smallest contribution can be enough to tip the scales one way or another at home. Treat your voice in your family's community as respectfully and carefully as you do here. It's not easy, and we understand that. You're busy - there are a thousand other things on your mind that seem more pressing and more urgent than spending an hour researching candidates to decide on a vote. You might even have trouble finding good information from people other than your parents and neighbors. But it's worth the effort. Go to your local newspaper's election guide, or perhaps a site like RealClearPolitics. Go straight to the candidates' websites themselves. Just as your professors tell you not to cite Wikipedia in your papers, due diligence is necessary in choosing a candidate. But which candidate takes office following Election Day is not the only issue at stake. We know it's exhausting, and we know it's taking over your life. But don't miss the rest of the ballot just because you're sick of the presidential horse race. There's more to Election Day than you might think, and your vote means more than you might think, too.  


The Observer

Response to affirmative action debate

·

It has come to my attention that my article on affirmative action that The Observer published Monday has created a huge controversy. Many people have told me that they were offended, upset and even enraged by my article. This was not my intention. I merely wanted to start a conversation about an issue that was in the news by putting forth my own opinion and then inviting others to do so as well. I apologize for being too insensitive, too vague and too general with my arguments in a way that led many people to feel as though I were disparaging minority students both at this university and elsewhere. I had no intention of suggesting that anyone at Notre Dame does not belong here. I have no data on Notre Dame's admissions that would suggest that Notre Dame is accepting minority students who are less qualified than the other applicants it admits. Every student of every race I have met in my more than three years here has been a credit to this institution, and I fully believe we all deserve to be here. In my article, I said other studies had shown other universities had policies similar to Duke's, but I did not explicitly state Notre Dame was not part of this group. I apologize for this oversight. I do not believe that SAT scores are the only, or even the most important, criteria in university admissions. Notre Dame has deservingly admitted students with SAT scores below the middle 50th percentile because we are more than our test scores. The Duke data I referenced compared students across every category their admissions office used to evaluate applicants, from essays to letters of recommendation. I cited the SAT in my article because I thought it would be a familiar, quantitative measure of student preparedness. I do not believe that all minority students, even those at a school like Duke that may significantly relax its admissions standards for certain applicants, are less prepared than the other students at their schools. I am sure there are many fully qualified minority students at Duke who got in on their own merits alone and who are succeeding in the hardest disciplines. I only meant to illustrate how affirmative action policies negatively affect these excellent students. By lowering the bar for certain members of a particular group, some universities risk cultivating prejudice by allowing others to falsely assume that all members of the group were admitted by easier criteria. I did not wish to dehumanize the people about whom I was writing by using the term "URM." Rather, I wished to avoid making the races that are most commonly considered "under-represented" feel targeted. I realize this has had the opposite effect, and I apologize for this mistake. I do not claim to understand all of the challenges that minority students face, and I should not have speculated about how these challenges might make them feel or how they might respond to such challenges. It was not my place. I merely wished to describe one academic problem that students could face as a result of a policy like Duke's. I also think that to increase academic achievement for all students, we must do a better job of ensuring that those who grow up in difficult circumstances of any kind have a safe, nurturing, and enlightening educational environment from an early age. Elliott Pearce can be reached at epearce1@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.


The Observer

Questionable costume choice

·

Dear student with the very inappropriate costume, I think you know who you are. You dressed as a very convincing male private part. I was wearing a bright red jacket and khaki cargo pants. I walked by you on Eddy Street by Legends, and I made sure to shake my head. I heard your two (male) friends giggling when they saw my reaction. I want to let you know that your costume was obscene and offensive. Not just to me, but to anyone with whom you interacted wearing that thing. Is that the way you want people in South Bend to understand Notre Dame students? Is that the way you want other students to see you? How can you expect to hold a serious conversation with anyone who met you or saw you? If a company finds a picture of you, how can you expect to be hired? This University needs men who have a sense of what is good and what is beautiful. We clearly do not have that when men dress the way you did. Kevin McShane senior off campus Nov. 1                                              


The Observer

Don't forget the 'PWMs'

·

Dear Mr. Pearce, I read your article "URM Debate" (Oct. 28), and I thought your goal of helping "URMs" (under-represented minorities) to "achieve their full human potential" was commendable. However, in your altruistic fervor, I believe you have neglected to consider another minority group which you and I both occupy: privileged white males (PWMs, if you will). Your argument makes perfect sense. As you noted, URM students can sometimes seem humiliated and frustrated. Previously I had attributed this to things like institutional discrimination, marginalizing terms such as "URM" and obnoxious classmates who hold prejudiced and paternalistic opinions about issues like affirmative action. But after reading your article it became clear to me that it was because URMs simply are "less qualified" and "don't belong," and furthermore that their racial communities are "characterized by mediocrity." Ouch! I would be humiliated, too. You have also opened my eyes to the true motivation of universities in this system. Observing the lack of incentives to do otherwise, I previously had thought that universities (especially private ones) admitted URMs solely because of their abilities to enrich both the academic and social communities on campus. I thought that universities had valued the diverse experiences and perspectives of URMs as essential contributions to an atmosphere of inquiry, learning and growth. Additionally, I thought universities valued the strong-willed character necessary to overcome institutional prejudice and daily microaggressions (written or otherwise) as an indicator of an ability to persist and succeed after graduation, ultimately bolstering the reputation of their alma mater. But I have now seen the light. As you pointed out, universities have in fact been driven by the same altruism which motivated your article, wanting to "[show] [URMs] that they are as good as anyone else." Although URMs have neither expressed complaints about the current system nor asked for assistance, the urge to help them is understandable. As PWMs, we have an uncanny ability to know what's best for others even when they don't and to express these convictions without the pesky intrusion of empathy and self-consciousness. But let us not be so selfless as to forget ourselves and our PWM brothers. When PWMs leave college, we inevitably are confronted with more "artificial diversity," which we are unable to escape even in the highest ranks of society. It's like a conspiracy. If only your letter could be read and appreciated by groups such as the Nobel committee and the 2008 American electorate, then maybe the world could begin to shake the nasty habit of "accepting URM applicants with weaker records." Until then, the reality remains that PWMs like you and I will be forced to live and work in a society rife with such "artificial diversity." And how would we learn to behave in such a society without the presence of URMs on campus? Without URMs around to help us, we might continue to cling to bigoted opinions which offend our URM peers (like those underlying your article), making it difficult to function in society after graduation. Your article and its subsequent backlash are an example of the learning experiences that you and I benefit from by having URMs on campus, so that we may learn not repeat those mistakes at work or in other important scenarios in the future. So I'm glad you're getting it out of your system now. But - from one PWM to another - don't forget the PWMs! Alex Andre can be reached at aandre@nd.edu     The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.



The Observer

The case against voter ID laws

·

Given the upcoming election, attention has been directed towards the recent efforts by state legislatures to protect against voter fraud by requiring a photo ID to cast a ballot. I applaud The Observer for featuring this topic in Monday's paper, as I believe it to be an important conversation to have. I would, however, like to respectfully present the case against voter ID laws and shed light on what they mean for our democracy.


The Observer

You could be a saint

·

Certainly you can remember times when you've heard people say of someone heroic or who has endured great suffering with patience and grace, "She's a saint!" or, "He's a saint!" Perhaps you've even heard it said about one of your own parents (though surely not because raising you caused them suffering . . .).  Though we most often think of the big names like Francis, Therésè or Augustine when we hear "saint," the Church from its beginnings used the term to mean any baptized Christian. On this Feast of All Saints, we ought to give thanks for the people we know and those we'll never know whose lives have allowed others to see God at work in the world a little more clearly. 



The Observer

Oklahoma hospitality

·

As a 2008 graduate, I have seen my fair share of college football games, including Notre Dame or not. The experience I had the last weekend of October was incredible. I have not come across a friendlier and classier group of fans than the ones I encountered in Norman, Oklahoma. The overwhelming majority of Oklahoma fans were kind, welcoming and some even asked if my friend and former Zahm roommate Michael Loulan (Class of 2007) and I needed any help getting around campus. I was invited to one tailgate after simply greeting a few Sooners fans and striking up a short conversation. After the game, two separate encounters involved Sooner fans coming up to the two of us, congratulating us on our victory and shaking our hands. I had never experienced anything like this from opposing fans as a Notre Dame alumnus and fan.