Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Thursday, April 2, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

Obama in the balance

·

Heading into the final night of the Democratic National Convention, President Obama had to carefully construct his balancing act. He had to address the promises of his 2008 campaign, while at the same time create ones for the next four years. He had to acknowledge the reality of the current economy and jobs market, while projecting his inherent optimism into his policies. He had to emanate a personal responsibility for his policies, while at the same time congratulate collective victories. He had to accept failures gracefully, and promote successes humbly. In short, he had to present a much more realistic portrait of the presidency, having had the experience of a first term. He indicated he was no longer running as a candidate, but as President. First lady Michelle Obama covered his personal character, saying he believes "when you've worked hard, and done well, and walked through that doorway of opportunity, you do not slam it shut behind you. You reach back, and you give other folks the same chances that helped you succeed." President Bill Clinton compared him with the Republican candidates Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, reiterating a criticism by Paul Krugman, an economics professor at Princeton University, that their numbers just do not add up on the budget. He also illustrated the type of balance that President Obama learned while in office. "Nobody's right all the time, and a broken clock is right twice a day. And every one of us and every one of them, we're compelled to spend our fleeting lives between those two extremes, knowing we're never going to be right all the time and hoping we're right more than twice a day." Dr. Cornel West, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, describes this balance as necessary part of being human. "To encounter honestly the inescapable circumstances that constrain us, yet muster the courage to struggle compassionately for our own unique individualities and for more democratic and free societies." Barbara Deming, an American feminist, advocated a similar view, calling this necessary balance an equilibrium between self-assertion and respect for others, one that highlights these unique individualities and the ambition for the common good. President Obama calls this balance citizenship: "The idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another, and to future generations." Citizenship and collective agency were the themes that carried the Democratic National Convention and that gave a collaborative face to the presidency. In balancing past and future campaign promises, President Obama acknowledged that "the times have changed" and that he is "far more mindful of [his] own failings." Yet, his promise for America is founded on the inspiring acts of individual Americans who know what citizenship means - a hope out of desperate times, sacrifice for a greater good. He mentioned a family business in Minnesota that did not lay off one employee during the recession, an act of true citizenship, where even the strivers did not lose sight of the people around them. Obama effectively identified what the pressure and resilience of constituencies can do: provide healthcare regardless of pre-existing conditions, make education affordable and open the door of citizenship to thousands of immigrants. Obama struck a balance in his new "Forward" slogan, revealing a mixture of "hope" weathered by partisanship and a more determined "change we can believe in." "Forward" has important ties to citizenship, especially taking his 2008 campaign into account. "Forward" carries with it more resilience, nose-to-the-grindstone experience than the 2008 slogans. "Forward" says, "Yes, we can. We will." "Forward" embodies the clear choice that both Democrats and Republicans have in this election, because the only acceptable direction is "Forward" in a progressive democracy. But most importantly, "Forward" acknowledges the path already traveled - it grants the lessons learned from mistakes, the experiences of successes and failures and, yet, it is a direction for an entire society, not just an individual. The president voiced a stark realization at the convention. "The election four years ago wasn't about me. It was about you. My fellow citizens - you were the change." It was a golden line, rhetorically powerful, one of the more poignant moments, and indicative of "Forward" as a direction founded on the idea that "as citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It's about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government." The way forward in a democracy is citizenship in action, which President Obama highlighted as the fundamental reason for change. Citizenship assumes no path is easy. Citizenship means that finding the balance of self-assertion and protecting others requires us to vote for values as well as policies. Ultimately, this election is about whose policies and leadership best reflect citizenship, affirming that rights cannot be called inalienable if they are not granted to everyone, because, as Clinton reminded us, "poverty, discrimination and ignorance restrict growth" and the movement forward. Alex Coccia is a junior Africana and peace studies major, and a gender studies minor. He can be reached at acoccia@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 


The Observer

Enjoy the ride

·

"Don't miss out on anything; you are only in college once." As we drove from Chicago's O'Hare Airport to South Bend three weeks ago, my dad repeated this phrase over and over again to remind me to take advantage of all of the opportunities and experiences I would have here at Notre Dame during my senior year.


The Observer

Christ in the dining halls

·

Deep down, I've always been a shy and reserved person. So imagine my frustration as my parents signed me up for as many activities as possible during my summer months off from school. I went to Nature Camp, Farm Camp and Golf Camp. If it was a camp, I probably tried it. I had fun, but I was always the kid who received that ambiguous personalized message on the camp t-shirt that read: "You are a great listener! Wish I could have gotten to know you better!" I was never really good at taking risks.


The Observer

Genderlect

·

A few days ago, I was organizing my desk and came across a folder of old essays. As I was leafing through the stack of papers, one from a communications class caught my eye. Vaguely remembering anything from the class, I began to read through what had discussed on Jan. 20, 2010. The paper was a response to Deborah Tannen, a professor at Georgetown University, her "Genderlect theory" and her interesting observations between male and female communication. As we know, a theory is a set of statements that explain a particular phenomenon. Tannen's theory compares the communication skills of men and women to show their differences due to their diverse motivations. For example, women use "rapport" talk to construct personal connections with others, whereas men practice "report" talk to establish status. By understanding these "genderlects" we can achieve a better understanding for the opposite sex and appreciate why we communicate the way we do. Women tend to be reactive communicators and use communication to build relationships with one another. Expressing emotion, relating to stories and listening empathically to another being establishes a connection through mutual understanding. One specific quality of being a reactive communicator is that they tend to apologize more to show their sympathy. Women, therefore, are more likely to apologize for trivial tasks or instances due to their means of reacting in conversation. Regarding male communication, men are more likely to engage in conversation when it makes them seem more competitive, appealing or strong. During discussion, joking and assertive speech is used to gain control in the environment. Conversations are typically had to be productive and get things done, rather than for just the heck of it. It is safe to say that not every male and female fits this description when it comes to communication. However, it is interesting to be aware of these generalized differences between the way the sexes converse. For you ladies, the next time you find yourself apologizing for something that you had no influence on, take note of it. Guys, when you are talking about how you just one-upped someone, think of how it relates to your tendency to use report talk and establish status. Even though guys and girls speak the same language, it will always be difficult to understand one another. I can only hope that you take Tannen's theory and see how it applies on the Notre Dame campus and with your every day conversations. Get talking.

The Observer

Something to yell about

·

It was a breezy Saturday afternoon as I stood on Bond Quad amidst alumni, students and friends of the University. The band, founded in 1846, played music from 2012, and I reflected on the many gifts its members have given to the University. The students, neither for scholarship nor for pay, spend hour upon hour in practice and performance. They are not unlike most of Notre Dame's student body. Most students selflessly commit their time and energy to remind the world why Notre Dame is among the greatest of all educational institutions. The band, nearly a century older than Notre Dame Stadium, is a reminder that, as many college game days have abandoned institutional identity in order to look like the NFL, Notre Dame has striven to maintain the beauty of live human competition and camaraderie, created and maintained by those with a deep love for school and sport. For a few short hours on a Saturday afternoon, we manifest our institutional love for this world and the next. As Fr. James Schall once wrote, "What holds us spellbound for a fascinating moment must not be totally unlike what holds us fascinated forever." Here, he is speaking about the greatness of athletic competition. He reminds us that "we do not go to the game to 'yell' ... Rather, we yell because there is something to yell about." We do not yell simply for the sake of yelling. At our best, we yell because we "love the Notre Dame." Football, as it turns out, can be a manifestation of identity, of community, of faith. Football, at its best, aids even the intellectual and the spiritual life. In his 2009 address to artists, Pope Benedict XVI said of beauty: "Because it opens up and broadens the horizons of human awareness, pointing us beyond ourselves... [it] can become a path towards the transcendent, towards the ultimate Mystery, towards God." Leading us beyond ourselves, the beautiful can aid in our ascendance beyond the merely temporal and direct us towards the eternal. Like art, a well-crafted game can lead us to something that is greater than ourselves. We can realise "there is something to yell about." In his 2006 Faculty Address, Fr. Jenkins quoted a remark a Harvard professor had made to him: "If Harvard should stumble and have to shut its doors, Yale or Princeton could, with time and effort, ramp up and credibly fill the gap. If the University of Michigan or Cal-Berkeley faced some catastrophe, Wisconsin or UCLA could hire their faculty, increase enrollment and take over research projects without irremediable loss to higher education in America. But if Notre Dame should fail, no other institution could fully take its place." As we hear about our lack of criminals and the exceptional academic performance of our athletes, we realize that this may be just as true of our football program as it is of all other aspects of the University. Nonetheless, it may be that traditions are fading, and we find ourselves succumbing to all the rest. In his memoirs, the late Ralph McInerny, professor of philosophy at Notre Dame, recalled that under Fr. Hesburgh, no football coach had ever been paid more than the highest paid professor. Today, we are tempted to scoff at his claim that "anyone who requires two million dollars to come to Notre Dame should be wished well in his future endeavors and forgotten." Yet, this was the Notre Dame he know. National championship coaches came to Notre Dame because they wanted to, not merely because they were paid to. Likewise, as we blare music from our speakers at football games, we forget that the greatest music of our stadium is made by our century-old band, composed of students who selflessly give their time and efforts to the University. The music of Notre Dame is not the sounds created and recorded by those who have never attended, visited or cared for our beloved University. So do we have "something to yell about?" This question can only be answered with other questions. Is our team composed of magnanimous Notre Dame men, or do we maintain an "edge" with a "few bad citizens"? Are our stands filled with fans cheering for something greater than themselves, or are they intoxicated with a Bacchanal frenzy? Do we need a seven-digit salary to convince coaches to consider our program, or do coaches seek out our institutional integrity and identity? And, finally, do we find ourselves, as individuals and as a community, animated by the Faith which calls us to something greater than even our games? Do we love the Notre Dame? Christopher Damian is a senior. He can be reached at cdamian1@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 



The Observer

The vast shadow of a former president

·

It's been nearly a week since the confetti from "Convention Season 2012" was swept up. Analysis of the Republican and Democratic National Conventions varied, but reaction from middle of the road commentators and voters was consistent: Mitt Romney was solid if not exciting, President Obama fell flat and Bill Clinton stole the show.


The Observer

1:01

·

Ratios. They're important. They're relevant in almost every situation. Parties - boy to girl ratio. Food - apple to peanut butter ratio, mac to cheese ratio, peanut butter to jelly ratio. Drinks - coffee to cream ratio. It always has to be perfect. And when it's not, it's bad.



The Observer

When to compromise and when not to

·

As the 2012 presidential election nears and the partisan animosity between the candidates and their supporters escalates, many concerned citizens have called for a renewed spirit of compromise in American politics. I acknowledge partisan gridlock has kept our government from resolving many crises, and I would like to see our leaders adopt a more civil and constructive tone when debating contentious issues. I am suspicious of "compromise" considered in the abstract, though, because I believe most proponents of compromise and bipartisanship give faulty reasons for why our politicians cannot come together and work things out.


The Observer

Multiculturalism fosters segregation

·

After reading "Segregation at the Tabernacle" (Sept. 3), "Segregation or Celebration" (Sept. 6) and "Celebrate to unify" (Sept. 6), I agree with the first article in that race-specific events wholly contradict the University mission of unification. How can race-delegated retreats unite all members of the Notre Dame community?


The Observer

Lessons from Bruce

·

It's the Friday before the first home football game, a day full of pep rallies, Irish music and general debauchery. And I'm going to Chicago. At about 7 p.m. this evening, I will enter Wrigley Field for a concert by one of the most epic musicians in history, Bruce Springsteen. Am I bummed about missing the first football Friday? Nope. I can't think of a better way to start football season and senior year than with some life lessons from Bruce. When my high school valedictorian, a fellow Notre Dame senior, quoted Bruce in his commencement address, I realized the true power of Bruce's lyrics: their lessons, their relatability, their insights. With a repertoire of over 200 songs, Bruce has a song for every moment, for every situation, for everyone. Many songs are for us, Notre Dame seniors, as we delve further into our last year under the Golden Dome. So, fellow seniors, here are a few words of wisdom from the legend himself, as applied to our final year at Notre Dame. 1. "If there's a light up ahead well brother I don't know / But I got this fever burnin' in my soul / So let's take the good time as they go / And I'll meet you further on up the road." In "Further On (Up the Road)", Bruce tells us to enjoy every minute we have left here. Even though we might not know what lies ahead of us, we're all pretty psyched that it's senior year. So let's have a blast and let life take us where it will. 2. "I'm working on a dream / Though sometimes it feels so far away, I'm working on a dream / And how it will be mine someday." Contrary to what we may have hoped, senior year is not easy. We're juggling the usual classes and extracurricular activities with the added stress of job searching, all while trying to maintain a social life. In "Working on a Dream", Bruce acknowledges our struggles. He reminds us that if we keep putting in the effort, we'll have that diploma in our hands before we know it. 3. "Now you can't break the ties that bind / You can't forsake the ties that bind." After graduation, we're all going to separate. We'll stay close with our best friends and stay friendly with some others, but most people will seem to have fallen off the face of the earth. In "The Ties That Bind", Bruce lets us know that no matter where we go in life, regardless of whether or not we will see each other again, we'll always be connected. To each other, and to Notre Dame. So cheers to senior year, to the first home football game and to Bruce. Let's live it up because, after all, this is our one last chance to make it real.


The Observer

Our voice at the Forum

·

In a recent interview with The Observer, University President Fr. John Jenkins said he felt the 2012-2013 Forum would be a reminder to students that the temptation to "check out" of discussion on American politics and major issues is one to be avoided. "I think Notre Dame students tend to be a thoughtful group and people of conviction, maybe not firebrands on one or another issue, but I think they can provide a thoughtful voice," he said. This fall, Jenkins announced the newest Forum theme: "A More Perfect Union." The year's Forum events will focus on the United States democracy and its future, with special focus on 2012 as a presidential election year. The Forum, established by the Office of the President in 2005, has since brought experts to campus to share their ideas on critical issues ranging from education to immigration. Notre Dame is the type of institution perfect for a conversation about the future of American democracy. We are a campus united under the gleaming image of the Mother of God, but we are also a campus of young voters and educated debate. It should be our natural instinct to fuse the two issues, religion and politics, as we approach an election. That conversation should happen here at Our Lady's University, a premier college that is both quintessentially Catholic and quintessentially American. Notre Dame is also at a crossroads with the federal government unlike it ever has been before. This spring, Jenkins filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of the University against the Department of Health and Human Services, challenging the relationship between the government and religious freedom established in the recent Affordable Care Act. In doing so, Jenkins inserted the University's voice into a conversation about the rights of the federal government and the place of religious freedom in democracy. The national conversation on this issue now includes Our Lady's University. This week, the President's Forum hosted its first event, "Conviction & Compromise: Being a Person of Faith in a Liberal Democracy." Important figures, in not only the Christian faith, but also the Jewish faith, congregated on our campus to discuss the way religion should intertwine with political life in our democracy. The voices of the experts present at the panel discussion were thoughtful and informed. But in the midst of their voices, our voice got lost. Only two students had the opportunity to ask questions at Tuesday's event. We have the ability and responsibility to be the people of conviction Jenkins described - to be that thoughtful voice. But the debate between panelists, however informative, overtook the chance for student participation at this first Forum event. We are the students of Our Lady's University. How do we answer Jenkins' challenge? How do we add our unique voice to these conversations, just as he has added the University's voice to the national stage? Thus far, the Forum has not provided an adequate outlet for student voices and ideas. Successful events that elicit student participation often happen at Notre Dame. The Center for Social Concerns often fosters discourse between visiting speakers and students. The Holy Votes debate, in many ways a precursor to this Forum's subject matter, incorporated students in its conversations along with the four featured professors. Smaller events based around the Forum, such as weekly lunches in the Department of Political Science, allow for more casual conversation among students. These events should be an example to the Forum's organizers on productive conversation between students and experts. The University needs the Forum to be a means to answer the president's call to be a thoughtful voice during this important moment in the history of our institution and our nation. But students also need to check into the conversation, to speak up on the issues that are critical at this point in time and to be ready with questions for the esteemed Forum guests. Students should take the opportunity to inform and shape not only their views on today's issues, but also the views of religious and political leaders. We are Our Lady's University, a premier college that is both Catholic and American. Check in, because our voice needs to be heard.  


The Observer

A welcome debate

·

In his latest column ("Romney's big mistake," Sept. 3), my friend and Washington Program colleague, Adam Newman, claims Mitt Romney's vice presidential pick of Paul Ryan is a failure because it shifts the focus of the election from the economy to the size and role of government, an issue on which he believes the Democrats have the upper hand. I disagree. Generally, the basic difference between the two parties (especially after the Tea Party craze in 2010) is that Democrats favor bigger government solutions while Republicans advocate for leaner, less intrusive governance. So to some extent, all elections deal with the size and role of government. And whether it was Coolidge, Reagan or even Bill Clinton, who exclaimed in 1996 that "the era of big government is over," small government has often carried a popular appeal. Philosophy on the size and role of government manifests itself in the policy ideas of each party. Mr. Newman argues the American people's belief that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are foundations of our society combined with our affinity for the ideals of these programs reveal an endorsement of big government. Unfortunately for Mr. Newman, myself and the American people, these programs are destined for failure. Luckily, Romney and Ryan realize this and have developed plans to stabilize these programs. Today's senior citizens, who deserve the entitlements they paid into, yet want to save these programs for future generations, overwhelmingly support Mitt Romney for President. Early September Gallup numbers show those 65 and older support Romney over Obama by a margin of 52-41. The positions of the two parties on a myriad of other issues reflect their core beliefs on the size and role of government. At the end of the day, even if the election is focused on the size and role of government, voters will still likely associate Barack Obama and his four years of championing big government solutions with the struggling economy. Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and their fellow Republicans running for office this fall offer a new approach. So, my Democrat friends, let the debate begin. Ben Moeller junior Fisher Hall Sept. 4 


The Observer

Segregation or celebration?

·

After reading Mr. Whichard's letter to the editor regarding "Segregation at the Tabernacle," Sept. 3, I took a moment to really think about what he was saying. I participated in a number of those cultural events, and never once did I feel like I was being segregated from the rest of the Notre Dame community. I still attended the same dining halls, the same football games, the same classes and lectures as the other, non-minority students on campus. I also went to many English masses in the Basilica, as well as the Notre Dame Encounter which is a nonethnic retreat. I attended and worked with the Latino Freshman Retreat, first as a participant, then as a leader. Never, in my time there, were any of the cultural retreats closed to people of any other culture or ethnicity. Every student on campus is welcome to attend any and all of the cultural retreats and masses. In fact, it is very often encouraged. Every time we had someone of a different background attend it was a matter to rejoice: the fact that someone outside of our ethnic group would find it relevant enough to spend a weekend learning about the culture and background that many of us had been raised in. Perhaps if Mr. Whichard took some time and attended one of these events he would see these special celebrations are not for the gratification or superiority of a specific race, but rather the celebration of culture. Let's remember if all of these groups did not exist on Notre Dame's campus, we would not get to enjoy such events as Asian Allure, Black Fashion show and Latin Expressions. These celebrations are opportunities for students all over Notre Dame's campus to learn and participate in the cultural differences that make our university beautiful and diverse. To deny these differences within our student body would be the antithesis of what Notre Dame is striving for. Our Lady's mission is essentially to prepare us for the world beyond those stone buildings and tree-lined walkways. Last time I checked, the world we live in is comprised of millions of different ethnic groups, languages, creeds and personalities. Wouldn't you want to be prepared for that? Ultimately, the God I know and love doesn't care if I pray in Spanish or English. The God I know loves all cultures, all ethnic groups, all people. Nicole Kimble graduate student off campus Sept. 5  


The Observer

Flex-point frugality

·

I have a confession to make. I burn through Flex points in the same way a professional athlete burns through his first paycheck or a trust fund baby burns through his or her parent's credit card. That is to say, with complete and utter recklessness. This revelation finally came to me in the same way many others have during my time at Notre Dame, as I was sitting on a couch in Reckers during the wee hours of Monday morning. I had been sitting on the same couch not even 12 hours earlier, yet here I was, making another "Reckers run" to break the monotony of a late-night homework session. I consider myself to be a prudent spender, as I've been careful with how I've spent the money accrued from my summer jobs over the past few years. But there is something about seeing that $375 balance in my account each semester that causes me to spend like a fiend. It's hard to define the exact reasons behind my massive point consumption. Part of it may be my schedule, or lack thereof, as I've never set a routine for mealtimes and usually just follow my impulses. I'm also slow eater and have a hard time finding 45-minute periods to spend at the dining hall and I occasionally get sick of dining hall food. (The dining hall food at Notre Dame is good, but it gets tiring seeing the same selection greet you day after day.) Seeing my balance is often more terrifying than seeing my final semester grades. I ran out of Flex points by Thanksgiving Break in my first semester of freedom and topped that feat when I saw my balance hit zero at the end of March last semester. I can only imagine how quickly I would have spent them had I lived in a prime campus location, like Sorin instead of Carroll, which is at minimum a harrowing 10-minute walk from the nearest food establishment. Meanwhile, some of my friends have guarded their Flex points as if they're bars of gold at Fort Knox, with some ending the year with more points than they started with. Maybe they think they can cash in their unused Flex points for thousands of dollars after graduation, but it's certainly interesting to see the stark contrast in consumption habits. So, in an effort to partially emulate these super savers and ensure I have enough points to eat during finals week, I've tried to restrict my use to three times a week. As my late night visit to Reckers shows, my old habits will die hard, but, like the main theme of the upcoming election, I do intend to fight lavish spending and maybe develop a healthy routine. And, if I'm unsuccessful I'm sure a few of you kind Domers can muster up the compassion to lend your ol' buddy Brian your ID card when the time comes.  


The Observer

Knowing Christ through atheism

·

Several years ago at a marriage preparation retreat at Notre Dame, I was responsible for meeting with the inter-faith couples. I knew well that these relationships, however loving, often presented unique challenges for the couple. But before me was a particularly intriguing couple. The bride-to-be was a practicing Catholic. Her fiancé, an atheist. With apprehension, I took a walk with this young man, casually tried to glean what he thought about things that matter deeply to his bride-to-be, like Christianity. So, we walked around St. Mary's Lake, and to my surprise, we quickly hit it off. Even more, our conversation revealed him as a great lover of humanity. He believed in respecting every human being, tried to treat others fairly and was profoundly ethical. So, finally, about half an hour into the conversation, I asked him, "So, what do you think about Jesus?" And, without missing a beat, he replied: "I think Jesus was a profound teacher. He gave the world an incredible system of morals. And the thing I respect about him the most is that he lived by what he taught, even when it cost him his life. For me, he's one of the great moral examples we have of what it means to live life with total integrity, and to be fully human." Of course, as he's answering, I'm thinking, "Darn, that's pretty good." And then I got nervous. Because I felt sure he was going to ask me, "So, what do you think about Jesus?" And in the moment, I wasn't sure I could come up with anything more. Fortunately, he didn't ask, but the question needled me the rest of the day. When I went home that evening, I was still restless about our conversation. This question wouldn't let me go: "What more do I have to say about who Jesus is?" Call it a matter of pride, but I really want to be able to say more about Jesus than an atheist. The encounter is reminiscent of a similar exchange between Jesus and his disciples. One day, Jesus asked his disciples what people are saying about him. The disciples responded with some pretty flattering descriptions. Some thought he's John the Baptist back from the dead, he was thought he was Elijah or one of the prophets. So, perhaps like me, the disciples squirmed when Jesus suddenly asked them the very same question I faced after my walk with the atheist: "But you, who do you say that I am?" Peter, when confronted with the question, is given the grace to blurt out, "You are the Christ, the Son of God." For many of us, however, this gift of immediate recognition is not always near at hand. More often, I have to wrestle out my belief. And as I wrestle with the question, "Who do you say that Jesus is?" I find myself reflecting on other stories from his life, which particularly resonate with significant moments in my life, awakening me to a deeper, more intimate understanding of Jesus. Who do I say Jesus is? I am led, for example, to the scene of the healing of the paralyzed man. "Your sins are forgiven. Take up your mat and walk," Jesus said. And I start to form an answer: "Jesus is my healer and liberator - the one who frees me from the attitudes, behaviors and prejudices that constrain my life and vision." I am led to the encounter on the road to Emmaus, and I think, "Jesus is the one who has walked beside me my entire life, and sometimes I hardly knew it, but then, suddenly, especially in the breaking of the bread, I knew nothing more certainly than Him." I am led especially to my favorite Gospel passage, the sublime encounter between Jesus and Mary Magdalene at the tomb on Easter morning. She didn't recognize him, but when he said her name, "Mary," she suddenly knew it is him, and tried to throw her arms around the one she loved.And I think, "Jesus is the one who knows me most intimately, my whole being, and calls me by name to a deeper friendship with Him, and life in God." Who do we say Jesus is? When Jesus invites us to know him more deeply than before, as I believe he invited me, through this encounter with this atheist, how do we respond? When we are led past our everyday, comfortable images of Jesus, to ones of deeper, more intimate friendship with him, who do we discover? I believe, in the end, through the gift of our faith, that we are all being led to Peter's graced insight. "You are the Christ!" But sometimes, to deepen our faith, it takes time. It takes trials: a sickness, the death of a loved one, the displacement of leaving home, an unexpected challenge to our faith or way of being through a class or a friendship. And suddenly we're confronted with the question: "You, who do you say that I am?" When these challenges appear in our own lives, stir up our hearts and make us restless, they invite us to come to know Jesus more deeply: "Who do you say that I am?" Ultimately, we can be led, little by little, challenge by challenge, to Peter's revelation. "You are the Christ!" is the answer to the deepest mysteries of our lives. This week's column is written by Fr. Lou DelFra, director of Pastoral Life for ACE and member of Campus Ministry. He can be reached at delfra.2@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 


The Observer

Celebrate to unify

·

While I understand what Johnny Whichard ("Segregation at the Tabernacle, Sept. 3) is trying to say, I think he misunderstands events for particular races and cultures as segregating and dividing students instead of recognizing and celebrating cultures. Nor do I think the events he refers to have made Notre Dame a fragmented, excluding community. Yes, Notre Dame is not as diverse as it could be. That is something the University and students can change. Advertising Notre Dame more around the world and recruiting more internationally could inform a greater diversity about the University and what is has to offer. Making Notre Dame a place where a greater diversity of people would want to come is an even easier way to reap the benefits of diversity. I believe the cultural events Whichard refers to are a step in the right direction. They are not meant to be divisive or to label students solely by race or ethnicity, but to celebrate what makes them unique and to welcome them into the Notre Dame family. Instead of attacking cultural celebrations as racist, it is more important to address the sentiment about diversity on campus in general. When people claim Notre Dame is "too white," Caucasian students begin to feel like "white" is a bad word, that they are all the same, that they have no distinguishable culture and that the lack of diversity on campus is somehow their fault. White is not a culture. Though there may be many things the same about white, American or Midwestern students, every white person being labeled as the same is a stereotype that we should fight. (Being Irish, for example, has more cultural significance than just American football, leprechauns and drinking.) We should learn to share and be proud of the cultures behind Caucasians too and celebrate them together alongside the other cultures we celebrate. I believe the University is doing this with its many cultural events, but students should know that they are encouraged to recognize, celebrate and participate in the cultures of others as well as their own. We are all different, but we are still Notre Dame. Claire Stephens senior Howard Hall Sept. 4 


The Observer

That's it. I'm switching parties.

·

It worked. I am no longer a member of the handout-asking, illegal alien smuggling, abortion-getting gang of socialists otherwise known as Democrats. I'm a Republican now. I can attribute this sudden change of heart to my own stupidity. I guess I was too busy rigging elections and hanging up Obama posters in my dorm. What caused this sudden change in belief? Your compelling argument. You really outdid yourself this time. I'm thoroughly persuaded. Everything I once believed with utmost conviction has been proved invalid. You're right: tax breaks to the rich always trickle down, gay marriage is wrong and the government shouldn't be helping those poor people so much. What was I thinking? All I needed was a little convincing to come over from the dark side. ...


The Observer

Another semester begins for the SIBC

·

As the new school year begins, so too does another semester for the Student International Business Council (SIBC).The SIBC is the largest student-run organization on campus with over 400 active members. It is open to students of all classes and majors. For those interested, the All-Council kickoff night will be held at 8 p.m. on Monday in the Jordan Auditorium in the Mendoza School of Business.