Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
Saturday, June 13, 2026
The Observer

Opinion


The Observer

Mitt Romney, private equity, Bain Capital and the 2012 election

·

One of the attacks that the Obama campaign has used against Mitt Romney are the dealings of the private-equity firm Bain Capital, of which Romney was CEO. This is perhaps the first time that such an intense examination of private equity has occurred at a national level. Amidst the plentiful talking points and sound bites in any presidential campaign, both private equity's supporters and its critics have misled the public.



The Observer

Finally at Fenway

·

On Wednesday night, my friend Fran and I left school and drove to Boston for the Red Sox-Yankees game at Fenway Park. That's right, we drove approximately 16 hours for a baseball game.


The Observer

Iran on 'Fire'

·

When most of us think about getting hacked, we usually think of leaving our Facebook open and having someone post offensive statuses for all our friends to see. But imagine if it were left wide open for someone more sinister than your roommates. Imagine if someone could access all of your conversations: They could see who you are talking to, when you were talking and what you were talking about. But even worse, imagine if the hack had come from code written by a malicious hacker intent on using that information against you. Now imagine it isn't you we are talking about, but Iran, and it isn't your Facebook account, but the critical, secret communication logs of the nation's nuclear program. This is the reality Iran's fledgling nuclear program had to face this summer when Flame struck their systems. Flame is the most advanced attack code ever seen, and it was deployed by an unknown entity on the Iranian facilities this summer. Flame recorded all data flow into, out of and inside of the facilities it was deployed against. In essence, it allowed the user to view all communications and information regarding the facility. The code for Flame is very similar to that of Stuxnet, the first cyber-weapon successfully deployed. Stuxnet was also deployed against Iran in the summer of 2010. Stuxnet targeted the Uranium enrichment facilities and was secretly deployed from multiple servers to avoid tracking. After being uploaded into the facility, Stuxnet burrowed into the hardware and began to wait. When the target was confirmed, it began an attack on the infrastructure of the enrichment facility.  Upon activation, the code started spinning the nuclear centrifuges at increasing speeds. When the angular momentum reached a certain point, Stuxnet stopped the drive shafts, causing the shaft to shear and break. To make the attack even more devastating, the code also ensured that the various sensor arrays continued to report that nothing was wrong. When the code was discovered, the facility was forced to shut down until every trace of the virus could be removed, delaying Iran's nuclear program for months. Stuxnet and Flame are also highly sophisticated in the way they chose targets: They would exploit zero-days, or loopholes, in the systems, customize in order to avoid detection, and then become active. However, the programs would only target specific systems, notably Siemens systems running certain processes. Since the combination of criteria is only found in the Iranian facilities, it is understood that these are targeted weapons. The question is: Who is pulling the trigger?  Due to the intensive secrecy of the code and the method of deploying the attack from a chain of unrelated servers, no one knows where the attack came from, and no one has yet come forth. Most experts theorize the code was written by the United States and Israel, under Operation Olympic Games (the United States' covert cyber-warfare program), because of the incredibly high level of complexity. In addition, Flame is equipped with a kill-command, where upon discovery it immediately wipes itself out and deletes all traces that it ever existed in the system. Even more frightening is the fact the code is now open source on the internet. If you desired, you could download the script, edit it to assign new processes and new targets (electrical grids, oil rigs and other infrastructure) and then redeploy it. This means should the wrong people begin to edit it, there could be vast repercussions. Flame and Stuxnet heralded in a new era of warfare: Suppose your enemy is developing a nuclear weapons facility on its soil. Traditionally, you would have to initiate a physical attack against the facility, which would result in loss of life, cause political blowback and likely launch an international conflict. Now imagine that you could secretly deploy a code that would render the facility equally inoperable without the aforementioned consequences. The new face of warfare redefines national security and introduces a new weapon that the traditional defenses of gates, guards and guns are useless against. The popular culture fascination with cyber-warfare already has a solid following, from films like Live Free or Die Hard to the forecasted plot of Black Ops II. These seemingly science fiction concepts are quickly becoming a reality. With the increasing dependence on computers and technology today for everything from infrastructure to finances, these attacks are only going to become more devastating in the future. Austin Lagomarsino is a junior aerospace engineering major. He can be reached at alagomar@nd.edu     The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer.  

The Observer

Legalize steroids

·

To put it simply, steroids should be allowed in Major League Baseball. (Gasp!) I know, I know ... what about the tradition and integrity of the game? Or how can we compare players across time if certain performances are enhanced by drugs? Or how are we to judge people for entrance into Cooperstown?



The Observer

Mitt Romney and healthcare

·

How would a Romney Administration approach health care? The presidential hopeful would like voters to believe he would never compromise on the issue, but at the same time recognizes the need to appease the varying factions that support him. The fact is that such competing factors make this question much more complex than it appears on the surface. However, we can get a glimpse into Romney's decision-making process by looking at how he has developed during his time as a political figure.


The Observer

Worth tucking into your pocket... or into your heart

·

I have just finished hanging up one of my favorite new birthday presents in my office. A dear friend gave me a framed print of her Scriptural "life verse," a small, valuable nugget from the Bible that she carries in her heart and tries to shape her approach to life.


The Observer

Pacem in Notre Dame

·

When each and every Notre Dame student takes their first step on campus, they can't help but notice the aesthetics that make the University of Notre Dame unique. From the golden statue of Our Lady, which stands erect overlooking our student body, to the outstretched armed mosaic of the iconic "Touchdown Jesus," this campus harnesses and expands upon the ideal of serene architectural beauty.  However, do our students fully reflect the peaceful nature of Notre Dame and the respect for all people which Catholic Social Teaching calls for? In 1963 Pope John XXIII published an encyclical entitled "Pacem In Terris," meaning "peace on Earth." In this encyclical, the Pope addresses all people, Catholic and non-Catholic, on methods to "establish with truth, justice, charity and liberty new methods of relationships in human society," all in an effort to establish universal peace. As students, we must critically analyze the social nature of Notre Dame's campus, to see how we can create Pacem in Notre Dame. Peace on Notre Dame's campus would require our student body to honor aspects that promote peace in the American society and Notre Dame's social atmosphere to the highest standard. This high standard is what we Domers demand in the academic world, and in my opinion, must demand in the social atmosphere of campus as well. I am not implying that the Notre Dame social atmosphere is defying all aspects of peace, but I am asserting that some of our Catholic principles of peace are not being upheld or are being questioned. Emails in the midmorning hours notifying students of sexual assaults are too common in the past years. Most of the students received one of these warnings in the first week of the academic school year that spoke of a sexual assault that occurred in one of our dormitories. Last year, the issues plaguing Notre Dame's racial climate were accentuated when racist and disrespectful actions were performed on one of Notre Dame's student organizations. The topic of racism has resurfaced in recent Observer Viewpoint articles. We continue to witness the ongoing struggle of one of Notre Dame's hopeful student organizations, a Gay-Straight Alliance, to gain recognition from the administration. Currently, student organizations are in the midst of a struggle with the University's investment team concerning Notre Dame's investments with HEI hotels and HEI's unethical treatment of laborers. With this racial and social discourse, I asked myself, "Where is the strong reliance on Catholic Social Teaching that Notre Dame students pride themselves on?" This summer, I had the great opportunity of serving a low-income community. There, I had a great revelation on the power of "service" compared to simply "helping." Helping implies that the individual doing the helping is better off than the one being helped, that the helper is the only one contributing to the relationship. Service, however, is a symbiotic relationship where both parties are interdependent on one another. Through this interdependence both parties gain insight on ways they can improve their own personalities and spiritual attributes. We as Notre Dame students must serve each other in this important time. We must serve each other in order to realize the issues that we can improve in Notre Dame's social atmosphere. We must recognize and rebuke false evidence, injustice, uncharitable action and inhibition of liberty, as Pope John XXIII suggests. Noticing these negative societal problems will not be enough however. We must raise our voices and take action against them. As students, we can demand these problems be brought forward by engaging each of them through passionate yet respectful conversation. These conversations will both highlight the issues that concern our student body and catalyze a sustainable change in our environment. Students serving one another will also have another positive affect on the student body: Service builds a special bond between students. It will help strengthen the sense of camaraderie among our student body and help form a connection of solidarity between Catholic Social Teaching and our convictions. So, this is a call to action. It's a call to action asking for students to take a more active role in our social and moral atmosphere. In the words of Pope John XXIII: "In order to imbue civilization with sound principles and enliven it with the spirit of the gospel, it is not enough to be illumined with the gift of faith and enkindled with the desire of forwarding a good cause. For this end, it is necessary to take an active part in the various organizations and influence them from within." If we follow these wise words and raise our voices and take action from within, together we can create Pacem in Notre Dame. Micah Burbanks-Ivey is a sophomore majoring in political science and economics. He can be reached at mburbank@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 


The Observer

Obama in the balance

·

Heading into the final night of the Democratic National Convention, President Obama had to carefully construct his balancing act. He had to address the promises of his 2008 campaign, while at the same time create ones for the next four years. He had to acknowledge the reality of the current economy and jobs market, while projecting his inherent optimism into his policies. He had to emanate a personal responsibility for his policies, while at the same time congratulate collective victories. He had to accept failures gracefully, and promote successes humbly. In short, he had to present a much more realistic portrait of the presidency, having had the experience of a first term. He indicated he was no longer running as a candidate, but as President. First lady Michelle Obama covered his personal character, saying he believes "when you've worked hard, and done well, and walked through that doorway of opportunity, you do not slam it shut behind you. You reach back, and you give other folks the same chances that helped you succeed." President Bill Clinton compared him with the Republican candidates Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, reiterating a criticism by Paul Krugman, an economics professor at Princeton University, that their numbers just do not add up on the budget. He also illustrated the type of balance that President Obama learned while in office. "Nobody's right all the time, and a broken clock is right twice a day. And every one of us and every one of them, we're compelled to spend our fleeting lives between those two extremes, knowing we're never going to be right all the time and hoping we're right more than twice a day." Dr. Cornel West, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, describes this balance as necessary part of being human. "To encounter honestly the inescapable circumstances that constrain us, yet muster the courage to struggle compassionately for our own unique individualities and for more democratic and free societies." Barbara Deming, an American feminist, advocated a similar view, calling this necessary balance an equilibrium between self-assertion and respect for others, one that highlights these unique individualities and the ambition for the common good. President Obama calls this balance citizenship: "The idea that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another, and to future generations." Citizenship and collective agency were the themes that carried the Democratic National Convention and that gave a collaborative face to the presidency. In balancing past and future campaign promises, President Obama acknowledged that "the times have changed" and that he is "far more mindful of [his] own failings." Yet, his promise for America is founded on the inspiring acts of individual Americans who know what citizenship means - a hope out of desperate times, sacrifice for a greater good. He mentioned a family business in Minnesota that did not lay off one employee during the recession, an act of true citizenship, where even the strivers did not lose sight of the people around them. Obama effectively identified what the pressure and resilience of constituencies can do: provide healthcare regardless of pre-existing conditions, make education affordable and open the door of citizenship to thousands of immigrants. Obama struck a balance in his new "Forward" slogan, revealing a mixture of "hope" weathered by partisanship and a more determined "change we can believe in." "Forward" has important ties to citizenship, especially taking his 2008 campaign into account. "Forward" carries with it more resilience, nose-to-the-grindstone experience than the 2008 slogans. "Forward" says, "Yes, we can. We will." "Forward" embodies the clear choice that both Democrats and Republicans have in this election, because the only acceptable direction is "Forward" in a progressive democracy. But most importantly, "Forward" acknowledges the path already traveled - it grants the lessons learned from mistakes, the experiences of successes and failures and, yet, it is a direction for an entire society, not just an individual. The president voiced a stark realization at the convention. "The election four years ago wasn't about me. It was about you. My fellow citizens - you were the change." It was a golden line, rhetorically powerful, one of the more poignant moments, and indicative of "Forward" as a direction founded on the idea that "as citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It's about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government." The way forward in a democracy is citizenship in action, which President Obama highlighted as the fundamental reason for change. Citizenship assumes no path is easy. Citizenship means that finding the balance of self-assertion and protecting others requires us to vote for values as well as policies. Ultimately, this election is about whose policies and leadership best reflect citizenship, affirming that rights cannot be called inalienable if they are not granted to everyone, because, as Clinton reminded us, "poverty, discrimination and ignorance restrict growth" and the movement forward. Alex Coccia is a junior Africana and peace studies major, and a gender studies minor. He can be reached at acoccia@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 


The Observer

Enjoy the ride

·

"Don't miss out on anything; you are only in college once." As we drove from Chicago's O'Hare Airport to South Bend three weeks ago, my dad repeated this phrase over and over again to remind me to take advantage of all of the opportunities and experiences I would have here at Notre Dame during my senior year.


The Observer

Christ in the dining halls

·

Deep down, I've always been a shy and reserved person. So imagine my frustration as my parents signed me up for as many activities as possible during my summer months off from school. I went to Nature Camp, Farm Camp and Golf Camp. If it was a camp, I probably tried it. I had fun, but I was always the kid who received that ambiguous personalized message on the camp t-shirt that read: "You are a great listener! Wish I could have gotten to know you better!" I was never really good at taking risks.


The Observer

Genderlect

·

A few days ago, I was organizing my desk and came across a folder of old essays. As I was leafing through the stack of papers, one from a communications class caught my eye. Vaguely remembering anything from the class, I began to read through what had discussed on Jan. 20, 2010. The paper was a response to Deborah Tannen, a professor at Georgetown University, her "Genderlect theory" and her interesting observations between male and female communication. As we know, a theory is a set of statements that explain a particular phenomenon. Tannen's theory compares the communication skills of men and women to show their differences due to their diverse motivations. For example, women use "rapport" talk to construct personal connections with others, whereas men practice "report" talk to establish status. By understanding these "genderlects" we can achieve a better understanding for the opposite sex and appreciate why we communicate the way we do. Women tend to be reactive communicators and use communication to build relationships with one another. Expressing emotion, relating to stories and listening empathically to another being establishes a connection through mutual understanding. One specific quality of being a reactive communicator is that they tend to apologize more to show their sympathy. Women, therefore, are more likely to apologize for trivial tasks or instances due to their means of reacting in conversation. Regarding male communication, men are more likely to engage in conversation when it makes them seem more competitive, appealing or strong. During discussion, joking and assertive speech is used to gain control in the environment. Conversations are typically had to be productive and get things done, rather than for just the heck of it. It is safe to say that not every male and female fits this description when it comes to communication. However, it is interesting to be aware of these generalized differences between the way the sexes converse. For you ladies, the next time you find yourself apologizing for something that you had no influence on, take note of it. Guys, when you are talking about how you just one-upped someone, think of how it relates to your tendency to use report talk and establish status. Even though guys and girls speak the same language, it will always be difficult to understand one another. I can only hope that you take Tannen's theory and see how it applies on the Notre Dame campus and with your every day conversations. Get talking.


The Observer

Something to yell about

·

It was a breezy Saturday afternoon as I stood on Bond Quad amidst alumni, students and friends of the University. The band, founded in 1846, played music from 2012, and I reflected on the many gifts its members have given to the University. The students, neither for scholarship nor for pay, spend hour upon hour in practice and performance. They are not unlike most of Notre Dame's student body. Most students selflessly commit their time and energy to remind the world why Notre Dame is among the greatest of all educational institutions. The band, nearly a century older than Notre Dame Stadium, is a reminder that, as many college game days have abandoned institutional identity in order to look like the NFL, Notre Dame has striven to maintain the beauty of live human competition and camaraderie, created and maintained by those with a deep love for school and sport. For a few short hours on a Saturday afternoon, we manifest our institutional love for this world and the next. As Fr. James Schall once wrote, "What holds us spellbound for a fascinating moment must not be totally unlike what holds us fascinated forever." Here, he is speaking about the greatness of athletic competition. He reminds us that "we do not go to the game to 'yell' ... Rather, we yell because there is something to yell about." We do not yell simply for the sake of yelling. At our best, we yell because we "love the Notre Dame." Football, as it turns out, can be a manifestation of identity, of community, of faith. Football, at its best, aids even the intellectual and the spiritual life. In his 2009 address to artists, Pope Benedict XVI said of beauty: "Because it opens up and broadens the horizons of human awareness, pointing us beyond ourselves... [it] can become a path towards the transcendent, towards the ultimate Mystery, towards God." Leading us beyond ourselves, the beautiful can aid in our ascendance beyond the merely temporal and direct us towards the eternal. Like art, a well-crafted game can lead us to something that is greater than ourselves. We can realise "there is something to yell about." In his 2006 Faculty Address, Fr. Jenkins quoted a remark a Harvard professor had made to him: "If Harvard should stumble and have to shut its doors, Yale or Princeton could, with time and effort, ramp up and credibly fill the gap. If the University of Michigan or Cal-Berkeley faced some catastrophe, Wisconsin or UCLA could hire their faculty, increase enrollment and take over research projects without irremediable loss to higher education in America. But if Notre Dame should fail, no other institution could fully take its place." As we hear about our lack of criminals and the exceptional academic performance of our athletes, we realize that this may be just as true of our football program as it is of all other aspects of the University. Nonetheless, it may be that traditions are fading, and we find ourselves succumbing to all the rest. In his memoirs, the late Ralph McInerny, professor of philosophy at Notre Dame, recalled that under Fr. Hesburgh, no football coach had ever been paid more than the highest paid professor. Today, we are tempted to scoff at his claim that "anyone who requires two million dollars to come to Notre Dame should be wished well in his future endeavors and forgotten." Yet, this was the Notre Dame he know. National championship coaches came to Notre Dame because they wanted to, not merely because they were paid to. Likewise, as we blare music from our speakers at football games, we forget that the greatest music of our stadium is made by our century-old band, composed of students who selflessly give their time and efforts to the University. The music of Notre Dame is not the sounds created and recorded by those who have never attended, visited or cared for our beloved University. So do we have "something to yell about?" This question can only be answered with other questions. Is our team composed of magnanimous Notre Dame men, or do we maintain an "edge" with a "few bad citizens"? Are our stands filled with fans cheering for something greater than themselves, or are they intoxicated with a Bacchanal frenzy? Do we need a seven-digit salary to convince coaches to consider our program, or do coaches seek out our institutional integrity and identity? And, finally, do we find ourselves, as individuals and as a community, animated by the Faith which calls us to something greater than even our games? Do we love the Notre Dame? Christopher Damian is a senior. He can be reached at cdamian1@nd.edu The views expressed in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Observer. 



The Observer

The vast shadow of a former president

·

It's been nearly a week since the confetti from "Convention Season 2012" was swept up. Analysis of the Republican and Democratic National Conventions varied, but reaction from middle of the road commentators and voters was consistent: Mitt Romney was solid if not exciting, President Obama fell flat and Bill Clinton stole the show.


The Observer

1:01

·

Ratios. They're important. They're relevant in almost every situation. Parties - boy to girl ratio. Food - apple to peanut butter ratio, mac to cheese ratio, peanut butter to jelly ratio. Drinks - coffee to cream ratio. It always has to be perfect. And when it's not, it's bad.



The Observer

When to compromise and when not to

·

As the 2012 presidential election nears and the partisan animosity between the candidates and their supporters escalates, many concerned citizens have called for a renewed spirit of compromise in American politics. I acknowledge partisan gridlock has kept our government from resolving many crises, and I would like to see our leaders adopt a more civil and constructive tone when debating contentious issues. I am suspicious of "compromise" considered in the abstract, though, because I believe most proponents of compromise and bipartisanship give faulty reasons for why our politicians cannot come together and work things out.


The Observer

Multiculturalism fosters segregation

·

After reading "Segregation at the Tabernacle" (Sept. 3), "Segregation or Celebration" (Sept. 6) and "Celebrate to unify" (Sept. 6), I agree with the first article in that race-specific events wholly contradict the University mission of unification. How can race-delegated retreats unite all members of the Notre Dame community?